Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

The Dial

 
Hoover's Profile: The Dial Corporation
Contact Information
The Dial Corporation
15501 N. Dial Blvd.
Scottsdale, AZ 85260-1619
AZ Tel. 480-754-3425

Type: Subsidiary
On the web: http://www.dialcorp.com

Don't look for dirt on The Dial Corporation -- it works hard to keep squeaky clean and as fresh as a daisy. It makes one of the top-selling soaps in the US and has leading brands in each of its two core product segments -- laundry and home care (Purex, Zout, 20 Mule Team, Combat, Soft Scrub, and Renuzit) and beauty and personal care (Dial for soaps, bodywashes, hand sanitizers; Tone, Coast, Dry Idea, Soft & Dri, and Right Guard). Dial became a subsidiary of Henkel KGaA in 2004. Soon thereafter Brad Casper replaced president and CEO Herb Baum, who retired in April 2005. Dial bought Gillette's Right Guard, Soft & Dri, and Dry Idea brands from Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 2006.

Officers:
President and CEO: Bradley A. (Brad) Casper
SVP and Controller: Ian Parrish
Communications Director: Natalie Violi

Competitors:
Colgate-Palmolive
Procter & Gamble
Unilever

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Company History: The Dial Corp.
Top

Incorporated: 1926, as Armour & Company
SIC: 2841 Soap & Other Detergents

The Dial Corp. is a leading manufacturer of consumer products in the United States, with four core brands: Dial soaps, Purex detergents, Renuzit air fresheners, and Armour Star canned meats. Dial led the U.S. antibacterial soap market in 1997 and was the third largest seller of detergents. Its canned meats were second in sales only to Hormel. Having grown to an unwieldy conglomerate in the 1960s and 1970s, the corporation underwent several episodes of restructuring and name changes. In 1987 it sold its Greyhound bus lines; in 1992, it spun off its financial services division to form Finova; and in 1996, it spun off its other service businesses to form Viad Corp.

The Dial brand name was first given to a unique deodorant soap developed by researchers at the Chicago-based meat processing business of Armour & Company. Introduced in 1948, Dial featured a newly developed germicide, known as AT-7, that was believed to reduce up to 80 percent more of the bacteria found on the skin than other soaps. Said to provide "'Round the Clock Protection," Dial was first advertised in the Chicago Tribune, on paper printed with scented ink. The innovative advertisement attracted a great deal of attention, and the soap achieved high sales from the onset. One Chicago store reportedly sold more than 4,000 bars in one day.

Dial soon became the leading deodorant soap in the country. In 1953 the company adopted a slogan--"Aren't you glad you use Dial? Don't you wish everybody did?"--that would continue to be used into the 1990s. In 1966 Armour announced that it would begin marketing aerosol can and roll-on deodorant products as well as shaving creams under the Dial brand name. Over the next five years, the new Dial products achieved record sales, and a shampoo was added to the Dial line.

In 1970 Armour was acquired by the Greyhound Corporation. The country's leader in the motorcoach industry since 1930, Greyhound, under chairperson and CEO Gerald H. Trautman, had begun to diversify its operations in the 1960s in response to declining bus ticket sales. As automobiles and airline tickets became less expensive and bus line profits dwindled, Greyhound acquired small companies in the fields of automobile leasing, money orders, insurance, and catering. Greyhound board members were approached by Armour in the late 1960s when General Host threatened Armour with a hostile takeover, and Greyhound was persuaded to add Armour to its subsidiaries. The 1970 $400 million purchase was Greyhound's first major acquisition. To reduce its investment, Greyhound immediately sold $225 million of Armour assets, retaining only the meat-packing and consumer products subsidiaries. The meat-packing operation was renamed Armour Foods, while the consumer products operation was renamed Armour-Dial.

In 1971 construction was completed on a new plant for manufacturing Dial soap in Aurora, Illinois. However, while Armour-Dial was now better equipped to meet consumer demands for the soap, the company was also faced with the possibility of having to alter the soap's ingredients. Although Dial had an excellent record of consumer satisfaction and the company had neither received any complaints during the soap's 23-year history nor been given any reason to consider the product unsafe, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found during this time that one of the soap's germicidal ingredients, hexachlorophene, was dangerous if misused or ingested. When the FDA banned the use of the chemical in cosmetics and restricted its use in soaps, Armour management planned, in conjunction with the FDA, to continue to market Dial with a label on the packaging warning users that the soap was for external use only and should be thoroughly rinsed off the skin after each use. Eventually, however, researchers at the company were able to develop an alternative ingredient that proved to be as successful as hexachlorophene had been as a germicide. Although the formula of Dial changed, it continued to rank as one of the nation's most popular soaps. In 1971 Armour-Dial's headquarters were moved to Phoenix, Arizona, where operations were reorganized under two primary headings: the Toiletries & Household Products Division and the Administrative Division.

Although Trautman had taken Greyhound from bus line to successful conglomerate, the company was still known on Wall Street as "the dog," due to the unpredictable swings in profits and losses it incurred from year to year. Problems were attributed to the rapid expansion of Greyhound's holdings to include such a vast and unrelated array of products and services. Furthermore, while Armour Foods and Armour-Dial accounted for over 50 percent of the company's revenues, their earnings proved extremely erratic, ranging from nine percent growth one year to 21 percent the next. The Armour Foods subsidiary in particular had also been troubled by frequent restructuring and changes in management. In general, analysts found that Greyhound was suffering from a lack of focus.

An overhaul of the company began in 1982 when John W. Teets was named chairperson and CEO. Teets began working for Greyhound in 1964 when he took a job managing the company's restaurants at the New York World's Fair. Recently devastated by a series of personal tragedies, including the deaths of both his wife and his brother as well as a fire that destroyed a restaurant of which he had been part owner, Teets threw himself into his new job at Greyhound, working long hours and exhibiting a determination and enthusiastic management style that was soon noticed by Greyhound executives. He was promoted to president of Post Houses, a Greyhound subsidiary that ran bus terminal restaurants, where he remained until 1968, when he accepted an offer from a Chicago-based restaurant chain. Teets returned to Greyhound in 1976 to head the company's Food Service Group subsidiary. By this time he had become known for his ability to help struggling companies return to profitability, and he was soon credited with turning around the entire food service division. By 1980 Teets held the executive office of vice-chairperson and was a contender for the presidency when Trautman retired.

Upon his appointment as president and CEO, Teets acted immediately to restructure the company, quickly establishing his reputation as a tough and demanding leader through his implementation of a new standard of 15 percent return on equity, a level of performance that he expected of each subsidiary. Reexamining Greyhound's holdings, he was quoted in Forbes as concluding that the company needed to "lean down, be tougher in the marketplace," through a long term agenda that included selling off several subsidiaries and cutting costs. In 1983, in one of his first major decisions, Teets cut the wages of union food and commercial workers at Armour Foods. When the workers refused to accept the cut, Teets shut down the 29 plants and sold the operations to Conagra Inc., which offered Greyhound a 15-percent stake in its company, a deal equaling around $150 million.

Also that year the company was faced with a widely publicized strike by Greyhound bus drivers strike. The bus line had experienced dramatic losses in ridership and nearly $35 million in operating losses in 1981 and 1982. Finding that Greyhound drivers were earning as much as 50 percent more than drivers at competing companies, Teets threatened to replace them with nonunion employees if they did not accept a cut in wages. A violent 47-day strike ensued, during which buses were kept running by nonunion labor. Eventually Teets prevailed, and union drivers returned to work at a lower wage. Although Teets was able to cut its operating costs, Greyhound never recovered financially, and early in 1987, he sold the Greyhound bus company to a group of investors from Dallas.

Having restructured the company's interests, Teets began a plan of selective acquisitions that would better fit the company's portfolio. Relying on the unmitigated success of the Armour-Dial division to provide expert management in the field, Greyhound acquired Purex Industries Inc., makers of laundry soap, for $264 million in 1985. The purchase doubled Greyhound's consumer product sales, and after a brief period of losses, the company recaptured its market share. Two years later, the company restructured the consumer products subsidiary along product lines, creating a personal care division that handled the marketing of bath and deodorant soaps, as well as the new and profitable Liquid Dial soap; a household and laundry division responsible for such items as detergents, air fresheners, and cleansers; and a food division that during this time introduced Lunch Bucket single-serving microwaveable meals.

By the late 1980s Greyhound had completed its plans for restructuring. With profits high from the sales of the popular Dial, Purex, and newly acquired Brillo steel wool soap pads, and stock prices low at around $27 per share, the streamlined company was ripe for a takeover, and rumors spread on Wall Street. In order to discourage raiders, Teets was faced with the challenge of raising the stock prices. By 1991, however, the company's debts had shrunk, its earnings improved dramatically, and stock prices had risen to $44 per share.

To minimize confusion for its investors and consumers by distinguishing the company from the Greyhound bus line it had sold off three years before, the company changed its name to Greyhound Dial in March 1990. At the time Teets decided to retain "Greyhound" as part of the company's new name in order to reflect the ten subsidiaries the company still owned that carried the Greyhound name, such as Greyhound Exhibit group. Within the year, however, when Greyhound Dial switchboard operators were still receiving numerous calls regarding bus routes and fares, management decided to make the message clearer still by renaming the company The Dial Corp.

In 1991 The Dial Corp. reported a loss of $57.6 million due to its restructuring and the costs involved in spinning off some of its subsidiaries. Revenues were up from $3.5 to $3.6 billion, however, and management estimated that without the onetime charges against earnings in 1991, The Dial Corp. would have reported a net income of $122.4 million.

To further streamline the company, Dial spun off its financial services company in 1992. Finova, the former Greyhound Financial Co., saw dramatic growth in the first few years after its divestiture from Dial. By 1996 its earnings doubled, to $97 million, and its sales more than doubled, to $781 million. More important to shareholders, its stock more than doubled, to $55. Such success left shareholders clamoring for further spinoffs. However, the company did not follow such a clear-cut plan in 1993. Although it did sell off its bus-making division that year, it expanded its airline services division by acquiring United Air Lines' kitchens. CEO Teets also instituted some cost-cutting measures, which helped the company achieve a rise in income from continuing operations from 1992's $74 million to $110 million in 1993. Growth continued in 1994, but it was mostly spurred by further acquisitions.

The idea of further divestiture simmered for the next couple of years, coming to a boil in 1996. That year Dial split into two publicly held companies: Viad Corp., which took the $2.2 billion services businesses, and The Dial Corp., which took the $1.4 billion consumer products businesses. The new services company comprised the former Dial's airline catering and services, including Aircraft Services Inc. and Dobbs International; convention services, including GES Exposition Services and Exhibitgroup/Giltspur, Inc.; leisure and payment services, including Travelers Express, the food service company Restaura, and Premier Cruise Lines; and the company's majority stake in Greyhound Lines of Canada.

The plan for the newly slimmed Dial Corp. called for a focus on its four core brands: Dial soaps, Purex detergents, Renuzit air fresheners, and Armour Star canned meats. These four product lines accounted for 90 percent of Dial's revenues in 1996. The company intended to raise that proportion even higher by selling or discontinuing underperforming brands. In July 1997 it followed through on that plan by selling Brillo soap pads, Parsons ammonia, Bo Peep ammonia, Sno Bol toilet bowl cleaner, Cameo metal cleaner, and Rain Drops water softener. Church & Dwight, manufacturer of Arm & Hammer products, bought the brands and Dial's London, Ohio, Brillo plant. The same year Dial also sold its Bruce floor care brand to Triangle Pacific Corp. Dial received about $30 million for these sales, and the company used the proceeds to pay down its heavy debt load.

With stiff competition in the domestic soap and detergent market, particularly from giants Procter & Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive, and Unilever, Dial needed further measures to improve their returns. In an effort to cut costs, the company moved its headquarters from Phoenix, Arizona, to suburban Scottsdale in 1997. It also eliminated approximately 250 jobs, mostly in management and administration.

"Working together, we have taken the tough steps to make Dial more competitive," Mal Jozoff, Dial chair and chief executive officer, said in a company release in mid-1997. "We've gotten our costs under control with actions such as moving our headquarters to a lower-cost facility.... In addition, we have trimmed our product line and are focusing on our highly successful core brands." There was some indication that these steps, in combination with the 1996 restructuring, were bearing fruit. The company's 1997 third quarter earnings rose to $22.4 million, compared to 1996's net income before restructuring charges of $7.4 million.

Further Reading

Byrne, Harlan S., "Investment News & Views: Dial Corp.," Barron's, August 26, 1991, pp. 378.

"Dial Corp. Restructures along Product Lines," Arizona Business Gazette, January 5, 1987.

"Dial Enjoys Its Liquid Assets," Packaging Digest, July 1989, pp. 74, 79.

"Dial: More Spin Required," Financial World, November 22, 1994, p. 22.

Forbes, Steve, "All-Around Successful CEO," Forbes, November 21, 1994, p. 26.

Galaraza, Pablo, "Dialing Up the Next Spin-Off," Financial World, September 16, 1996, pp. 42-5.

Gillespie, Phyllis, "Turning the Dial," Arizona Republic, December 22, 1991.

Kiley, David, "Greyhound Dials Up a Name Change--More or Less," Adweek's Marketing Week, March 5, 1990, p. 5.

Sivy, Michael, "Pump Up Your Fund Profits with Four Choice Stocks," Money, July 1997, p. 180.

Stuart, Alexander, "Greyhound Gets Ready for a New Leader," Fortune, December 15, 1980, pp. 58-64.

"Will More Soap Help Greyhound Shine?" Business Week, March 11, 1985.

— Tina Grant; Updated by Susan Windisch Brown


Wikipedia: The Dial
Top
The January 1920 issue of The Dial.

The Dial was an American magazine published intermittently from 1840 to 1929. In its first form, from 1840 to 1844, it served as the chief publication of the Transcendentalists. In the 1880s it was revived as a political magazine. From 1920 to 1929 it was an influential outlet for Modernist literature in English.

Contents

Transcendentalist journal

July 1843 issue of The Dial, featuring Margaret Fuller's "The Great Lawsuit"

Members of the Transcendental Club began talks for creating a vehicle for their essays and reviews in philosophy and religion in October 1839.[1] Other influential journals, including the North American Review and the Christian Examiner refused to accept their work for publication.[2] Orestes Brownson proposed utilizing his recently-established periodical Boston Quarterly Review but members of the club decided a new publication was a better solution.[3] Frederick Henry Hedge, Theodore Parker, and Ralph Waldo Emerson were originally considered for the editor role.[1] On October 20, 1839, Margaret Fuller officially accepted the editorship, though she was unable to begin work on the publication until the first week of 1840.[3] George Ripley served as the managing editor.[4] Its first issue was published in July 1840 with an introduction by Emerson calling it a "Journal in a new spirit".[5] In this first form, the magazine remained in publication until 1844. Emerson wrote to Fuller on August 4, 1840, of his ambitions for the magazine:

I begin to wish to see a different Dial from that which I first imagined. I would not have it too purely literary. I wish we might make a Journal so broad & great in its survey that it should lead the opinion of this generation on every great interest & read the law on property, government, education, as well as on art, letters, & religion. A great Journal people must read. And it does not seem worth our while to work with any other than sovereign aims. So I wish we might court some of the good fanatics and publish chapters on every head in the whole Art of Living....I know the danger of such latitude of plan in any but the best conducted Journal. It becomes friendly to special modes of reform, partisan, bigoted, perhaps whimsical; not universal & poetic. But our round table is not, I fancy, in imminent peril of party & bigotry, & we shall bruise each the other's whims by the collision.[6]

The title of the journal, which was suggested by Bronson Alcott, intended to evoke a sundial. The connotations of the image were expanded upon by Emerson in concluding his editorial introduction to the journal's first issue:

And so with diligent hands and good intent we set down our Dial on the earth. We wish it may resemble that instrument in its celebrated happiness, that of measuring no hours but those of sunshine. Let it be one cheerful rational voice amidst the din of mourners and polemics. Or to abide by our chosen image, let it be such a Dial, not as the dead face of a clock, hardly even such as the Gnomon in a garden, but rather such a Dial as is the Garden itself, in whose leaves and flowers the suddenly awakened sleeper is instantly apprised not what part of dead time, but what state of life and growth is now arrived and arriving.[7]

The Dial was heavily criticized, even by Transcendentalists. Ripley said, "They had expected hoofs and horns while it proved as gentle as any sucking dove".[8] The journal was never financially stable. In 1843, Elizabeth Peabody, acting as business manager, noted that the journal's income was not covering the cost of printing and that subscriptions totaled just over two hundred.[9] It ceased publication in April 1844. Horace Greeley, in the May 25 issue of the New-York Weekly Tribune, reported it as an end to the "most original and thoughtful periodical ever published in this country".[9]

Political magazine

After a one-year revival in 1860, the third incarnation of The Dial, this time as a journal of both politics and literary criticism, began publication in 1880. This version of the magazine was founded by Francis Fisher Browne, who would serve as its editor for over three decades. He envisioned his new literary journal in the genteel tradition of its predecessor, containing book reviews, articles about current trends in the sciences and humanities, and politics, as well as long lists of current book titles. It was in this form that Margaret Anderson, soon to be founder of The Little Review, worked for the magazine. Although published in a city reputedly indifferent to literary pursuits (Chicago), The Dial attained national prominence, absorbing the Chap-Book in 1898. Known for its unswerving standard in design and content, The Dial changed character after its sale by the Browne family in 1916 and subsequent removal to New York in 1918.

Modernist literary magazine

In 1920, Scofield Thayer and Dr. James Sibley Watson. Jr. re-established The Dial as a literary magazine, the form for which it is was most successful and best known. Under Watson's and Thayer's sway The Dial published remarkably influential artwork, poetry and fiction, including William Butler Yeats' The Second Coming and the first United States publication of T. S. Eliot's The Waste Land. The first year alone saw the appearance of Sherwood Anderson, Djuna Barnes, Kenneth Burke, William Carlos Williams, Hart Crane, E. E. Cummings, Charles Demuth, Kahlil Gibran, Gaston Lachaise, Amy Lowell, Marianne Moore, Ezra Pound, Odilon Redon, Bertrand Russell, Carl Sandburg, Van Wyck Brooks, and W. B. Yeats.

The Dial published art as well as poetry and essays, with artists ranging from Vincent van Gogh, Renoir, Henri Matisse, and Odilon Redon, through Oskar Kokoschka, Constantin Brancusi, and Edvard Munch, and Georgia O'Keeffe and Joseph Stella. The magazine also reported on the cultural life of European capitals, writers included T. S. Eliot from London, John Eglinton from Dublin, Ezra Pound from Paris, Thomas Mann from Germany, and Hugo von Hofmannsthal from Vienna.

Watson was the steadfast foundation for The Dial as the magazine proceeded through a series of editors: Thayer from 1920–26, Gilbert Seldes (1922–23), Kenneth Burke (1923), Alyse Gregory (1923–25), Marianne Moore (1925–29). Thayer fell ill in 1927. The Dial ceased publication in July 1929.

The Dial Award

In 1921, Thayer and Watson announced the creation of the Dial Award, $2000 to be presented to one of its contributors, acknowledging their "service to letters" in hopes of providing the artist with "leisure through which at least one artist may serve God (or go to the Devil) according to his own lights." Eight awards were granted.

Notable contributors by volume

In its literary phase, The Dial was published monthly. Notable contributors for each of its volumes (six-month intervals) are summarized below.

References

  1. ^ a b Gura, Philip F. American Transcendentalism: A History. New York: Hill and Wang, 2007: 128. ISBN 978-0-8090-3477-2
  2. ^ Slater, Abby. In Search of Margaret Fuller. New York: Delacorte Press, 1978: 51. ISBN 0-440-03944-4
  3. ^ a b Von Mehren, Joan. Minerva and the Muse: A Life of Margaret Fuller. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press, 1994: 120. ISBN 1-55849-015-9
  4. ^ Slater, Abby. In Search of Margaret Fuller. New York: Delacorte Press, 1978: 61–62. ISBN 0-440-03944-4
  5. ^ Gura, Philip F. American Transcendentalism: A History. New York: Hill and Wang, 2007: 129. ISBN 978-0-8090-3477-2
  6. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Emerson's Prose and Poetry, ed. Porte and Morris. p. 549
  7. ^ The Transcendentalists, ed. Miller, p. 251
  8. ^ Golemba, Henry L. George Ripley. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1977: 59. ISBN 0-8057-7181-6
  9. ^ a b Gura, Philip F. American Transcendentalism: A History. New York: Hill and Wang, 2007: 130. ISBN 978-0-8090-3477-2

External links

Wikisource-logo.svg
Wikisource has a volume list, with links to digitised editions:

 
 

 

Copyrights:

Hoover's Profile. ©2008 Hoover's, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Company History. International Directory of Company Histories. Copyright © 2006 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "The Dial" Read more