-
Elms are deciduous and semi-deciduous
trees making up the genus Ulmus, family Ulmaceae, found throughout the Northern Hemisphere from
Siberia to Indonesia, Mexico
to Japan. Many species and cultivars have also been introduced as ornamentals to parts of the
Southern Hemisphere, notably Australasia.
Elms have alternate, simple, single- or doubly-serrate leaves, usually asymmetric at the base and acuminate at the apex. They
are hermaphroditic, having perfect flowers which,
being wind-pollinated, are without petals. The fruit is a round wind-dispersed samara.
All species are tolerant of a wide range of soils and pH levels but, with one exception (the
European White Elm U. laevis), demand good drainage.
The other genera of the Ulmaceae are Zelkova (Zelkova) and Planera
(Water Elm). Celtis (Hackberry or Nettle
Tree), formerly included in the Ulmaceae, is now included in the family Cannabaceae.
Species, varieties and hybrids
-
There are approximately 30 to 40 species of elm; the ambiguity in number a result of
difficult species delimitations in elms, owing to the ease of hybridization between them and the
development of local seed-sterile vegetatively-propagated microspecies in some areas, mainly in
the field elm group. Six species are endemic to North
America, and a smaller number to Europe; the greatest diversity is found in
China.
During the 18th and 19th centuries, elm cultivars enjoyed much popularity as ornamentals by virtue of their rapid growth and
variety of foliage and forms. This 'belle époque' lasted until the First World War, when the consequences of hostilities, notably in Germany,
and the outbreak of Dutch elm disease saw the elm slide into horticultural decline.
The further disruption caused by the Second World War and, 20 years later, the devastation
wrought by the outbreak of a new, far more virulent strain of Dutch elm disease, brought the tree to its nadir.
Since circa 1980 however, the elm has enjoyed a slow renaissance through the successful development in North America and
Europe (notably the Netherlands until 1992, and, more recently, Italy) of cultivars highly resistant to the new strain of the disease. Consequently, the total number of named
cultivars, ancient and modern, now exceeds 300, although many of the older clones, possibly
over 120, have been lost to cultivation. Unhappily, enthusiasm for the newer clones often remains low owing to the poor
performance of earlier, supposedly disease-resistant Dutch trees released in the 1960s and 1970s. In the UK for example, only three of the new American and European releases were commercially available in
2007.
In 1997, a European Union elm project was initiated, its aim to coordinate the
conservation of all the elm genetic resources of the member states and, among other things, to assess their resistance to Dutch
elm disease. Accordingly, over 300 clones were selected and propagated for testing (Solla et al., 2005).
The classification adopted for Elm species, varieties,
cultivars and hybrids is largely based on that established by Brummitt (1992). A large number of synonyms have accumulated
over the last three centuries, their Accepted Names can be found on Elm
Synonyms and Accepted Names.
Cultivation and uses
Elm wood was valued for its interlocking grain, and consequent resistance to splitting, with
significant uses in wheels, chair seats and coffins. The wood is also resistant to decay when permanently wet, and hollowed trunks were widely used as water
pipes during the medieval period in Europe. Elms also have a long history of cultivation for
fodder, with the leafy branches cut for livestock. The bark,
cut into strips and boiled, sustained much of the rural population of Norway during the famine in
the mid-19th century.
From the 18th century to the early 20th century, elms were among the most widely planted ornamental tree in both Europe and
North America. They were particularly popular as a street tree in avenue plantings in towns and cities, creating high-tunnelled effects, and to this day, 'Elm Street'
remains the most common road name in the USA. In North America the species most commonly planted was the American Elm U.
americana, which had unique properties that made it ideal for such use: rapid growth, adaptation to a broad range of
climates and soils, strong wood, resistance to wind damage, and vase-like growth habit requiring
minimal pruning. In Europe, the Wych Elm U. glabra and the Smooth-leaved Elm U.
minor var. minor were the most widely planted in the countryside, with the former in northern areas (Scandinavia, northern Britain), and the latter further south. The
hybrid between these two, Dutch Elm U. × hollandica, occurs naturally and was also commonly planted. In England, it was
the English Elm Ulmus procera that came to dominate the landscape; planted in
hedgerows, it often occurred in densities of over 1000 per square kilometre. Such was its ubiquity, it almost always featured in
the landscape paintings of John Constable. In Australia, large numbers of English Elms, as well as other species and cultivars, were planted as
ornamentals following their introduction in the 19th century.
Wych Elm leaves and seeds
In parks and gardens, from about 1850 to 1920 the most prized small specimen elm was the Camperdown Elm, a contorted weeping cultivar of the Wych Elm
Ulmus glabra Camperdownii, grafted on a standard elm trunk to give a wide, spreading and weeping fountain shape in large
garden spaces.
Pests and diseases
-
Many species of Lepidopteran larvae uses elm as a food
plant; see list of Lepidoptera which feed on Elms. In Australia,
introduced elm trees are sometimes used as foodplants by the larvae of hepialid
moths of the genus Aenetus. These burrow horizontally into
the trunk then vertically down.
Dutch elm disease
-
Dutch elm disease devastated elms throughout Europe and North America in the 20th century. It is caused by the
micro-fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi transmitted by two species of Scolytus elm-bark
beetle which act as vectors. The disease affects all
species of elm native to North America and Europe, but many Asiatic species have anti-fungal genes and are resistant. Fungal
spores, introduced into wounds in the tree caused by the beetles, invade the xylem or vascular
system. The tree responds by producing tyloses, effectively blocking the flow from roots to
leaves. Woodland trees in North America are not quite as susceptible to the disease because they usually lack the root-grafting
of the urban elms and are somewhat more isolated from each other. In France, inoculation of over three hundred clones of the
European species with the fungus failed to find a single variety possessed of any significant resistance.
An earlier, less aggressive strain of the disease fungus, Ophiostoma ulmi, first appeared in Europe in 1910 and North
America in 1928, but had declined by the 1940s. The second, far more virulent strain of the disease was identified in Europe in
the late 1960s, and within a decade had killed over 20 million trees (approximately 75%) in the UK alone. The origin of the new
strain remains a mystery; earlier believed to have been endemic to China, surveys there in 1986 found no trace of it, although
bark beetles were common. The most popular hypothesis is that it arose from a hybrid between
the original O. ulmi and another strain endemic to the Himalaya, O. himal-ulmi. While there is no sign of the
current pandemic waning, there is some hope in the susceptibility of the fungus to a disease of its own caused by d-factors:
naturally occurring virus-like agents that can severely debilitate it and reduce its sporulation.
Owing to its geographical isolation and effective quarantine enforcement, Australia has so
far been unaffected by Dutch Elm Disease, and as such retains some of the world's best stands of English Elms; the long avenues of Royal Parade and St Kilda
Road in Melbourne are perhaps the most beautiful examples [9]. Grattan St,
Carlton, is also a very pleasing example of a stand of elms.
The provinces of Alberta and British Columbia in
western Canada are also free of Dutch Elm disease, although in 1998, one tree in
southeastern Alberta was found diseased and destroyed immediately before the disease could spread. Aggressive means are being
taken to prevent any occurrences of the disease in these two provinces. In fact, Alberta has the world's largest stands of elms
unaffected by the disease, and many streets and parks in Edmonton and Calgary are still lined with large numbers of healthy mature trees.
Resistant cultivars
Efforts to develop resistant cultivars began in the Netherlands in 1928. Research was later
initiated in North America in 1937, and continues to this day in Italy. Research has followed two paths:
Hybrid cultivars from crossings of Asiatic with European species, or of Asiatic elms alone because of their innate
resistance to Dutch elm disease. After a number of false dawns in the 1970s, this approach has produced some fine trees. Clones
with immunity or very high resistance to disease have been raised in the USA, the Netherlands, and Italy, and are now
commercially available after many years of field trials. However, some of these trees, notably those with the Siberian Elm U.
pumila in their ancestry, will probably have a comparatively small mature size and lack the forms for which the iconic
American Elm and English Elm were prized. Several of the same have also proven unsuited to the maritime climate conditions in northwestern Europe, notably because of their intolerance of ponding on
poorly-drained soils in winter. Dutch hybridizations included the Himalayan Elm U.
wallichiana as a source of anti-fungal genes and have proved more tolerant of wet ground; they should also ultimately reach a
greater size. In recent years, a number of promising hybrids have been developed and propagated in Europe, notably
'Nanguen (Lutèce™) in France and 'Plinio' in Italy, both effectively immune to Dutch elm disease.
Species cultivars, mostly selected in North America. Careful selection has produced a number of trees not only
resistant to disease, but also the droughts and extremely cold winters afflicting that continent. Research in the USA has
concentrated on the American Elm U. americana, resulting in the release of highly
resistant clones, notably 'Valley Forge'. Other species from which suitable
cultivars have been selected in North America have included the Chinese Elm U.
parvifolia, the Siberian Elm U. pumila, and the Japanese Elm U. davidiana, var. japonica.
Elms take many decades to grow to maturity, and as the introduction of these cultivars is relatively recent, their performance
and ultimate size cannot be predicted with certainty.
The European White Elm
Finally, there is the unique example of the European White Elm. Whilst the tree has
little innate resistance to Dutch elm disease, it is not favoured by the vector bark beetles and thus only becomes colonized and
infected when there are no other choices, a rare situation in western Europe. Research in Spain (Martín-Benito et al. 2005) has
suggested that it might be the presence of a triterpene, alnulin, that makes the tree bark unattractive to the beetle species that spread the disease. However this
has not been conclusively proved (Pajares et al 2004).
Notable elm trees
- Sherwood Forest — the "Langton Elm" was a large tree that "was for a long time so
remarkable as to have a special keeper", according to a book published [1]
- Oxford — "Joe Pullen's Tree" was planted in about 1700 by the Rev. Josiah Pullen, vice
president of Magdalen Hall. Josiah Pullen "used to Walk to that place every day, sometimes twice a day", according to diarist
Thomas Hearne. The famous essayist Richard Steele (1672–1729) said his regular walks as
an undergraduate to the elm with Pullen helped him to reach a "florid old age". The elm became famous at Oxford and its fame grew
with its age. In November 1795, Gentleman's Magazine reported that "Joe
Pullen, the famous elm, upon Headington hills, had one of its large branches torn off and carried to a great distance." When new
parliamentary district boundaries were drawn after the Reform Act of 1832, the tree was
named as a landmark helping to mark the boundary of the Parliamentary Borough of Oxford. In early 1847, the owner of the property
arranged to have the tree torn down, and work started on it before protests put an end to the plan. By 1892, however, rot had set
in, and the tree was torn down to its (large and tall) "stump". Early in the morning of October 13, 1909, vandals set fire to the
stump. A plaque was soon after installed on the side wall of Davenport House in Cuckoo Lane, marking the spot. It reads:
- NEAR THIS SPOT STOOD
- THE FAMOUS ELM
- PLANTED BY THE REV. JOSIAH PULLEN
- ABOUT 1680 AND KNOWN AS
- JO PULLEN'S TREE
- DESTROYED BY FIRE
- ON 13 OCTOBER 1909[2]
Penn and Indians with treaty under the elm
- The Liberty Tree on Boston Common that was a
rallying point for the growing resistance to the rule of England over the American colonies.
- Cambridge, Massachusetts — George
Washington is said to have taken command of the American Continental Army under
"the Washington Elm" in Cambridge on July 3, 1775. The tree
survived until the 1920s and "was thought to be a survivor of the primeval forest". In 1872, a large branch fell from it and was
used to construct a pulpit for a nearby church.[3] The tree, an American White Elm, became a celebrated attraction, with its own plaque, a fence
constructed around it and a road moved in order to help preserve it.[4] The tree was cut down (or fell — sources differ) in October 1920 after an expert determined it was
dead. The city of Cambridge had plans for it to be "carefully cut up and a piece sent to each state of the country and to the
District of Columbia and Alaska," according to The Harvard Crimson.[5] As late as the early 1930s, garden shops advertised that they
had cuttings of the tree for sale, although the accuracy of the claims has been doubted. A Harvard "professor of plant anatomy"
examined the tree rings days after the tree was felled and pronounced it between 204 and 210 years old, making it at most 62
years old when Washington took command of the troops at Cambridge. The tree would have been a bit more than two feet in diameter
(at 30 inches above ground) in 1773.[6] eIn 1896, an
alumnus of the University of Washington, obtained a rooted cutting of the
Cambridge tree and sent it to Professor Edmund Meany at the university. The cutting was planted, cuttings were then taken from
it, including one planted on February 18, 1932, the 200th
anniversary of the birth of George Washington, for whom Washington state is named. That tree remains on the campus of the
Washington State Capitol. Just to the west of the tree is a small elm from a cutting made in 1979.[4]
- Washington, D.C. — George Washington supposedly had a favorite spot under an elm tree near the United States Capitol Building
from which he would watch construction of the building. The elm stood near the Senate wing of the Capitol building until
1948.[3]
- Brown University — "Elmo", a large elm which "once defined the Thayer Street
entrance to Brown’s new Watson Institute for International Studies" on the campus of the Providence, Rhode Island school, contracted Dutch Elm disease and was torn down in December
2003, according to a campus news release. The tree "was thought to have been between 80 and 100 years old. Wood from the tree,
one of the largest on campus, was used in various student art projects.[7]
- Association Island — the General
Electric think tank organization, the Elfun Society, founded in 1928 at Association Island in the Thousand Islands area of
northern New York state, is named after a "famous" elm tree on the 65-acre isle. The tree died in the 1970's, but it survives in
the elm tree logo still used by Elfun.[8]
References
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
- Armstrong, J. V. & Sell, P. D. (1996). A revision of the British elms (Ulmus L., Ulmaceae): the historical
background. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 120: 39-50.
- Bean, W. J. (1981). Trees and shrubs hardy in Great Britain, 7th edition. Murray, London.
- Biggerstaffe, C., Iles, J. K., & Gleason, M. L. (1999). Sustainable urban landscapes: Dutch elm disease and
disease-resistant elms. SUL-4, Iowa State University.
- Brasier, C. M. (1996). New horizons in Dutch elm disease control. Pages 20-28 in: Report on Forest Research, 1996.
Forestry Commission. HMSO, London, UK.[10]
- Brookes, A. H. (2006). An evaluation of disease-resistant hybrid and exotic elms as larval host plants for the
White-letter Hairstreak Satyrium w-album, Part 1. [11].
Butterfly Conservation. Lulworth, UK.
- Brummitt, R. K. (1992). Vascular Plant Families & Genera. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew, London, UK.
- Burdekin, D. A. & Rushforth, K. D. (Revised by Webber J. F. 1996). Elms resistant to Dutch elm disease. Arboricultural
Research Note 2/96. Arboricultural Advisory and Information Service, Alice Holt, Farnham, UK.
- Collin, E. (2001). Elm. In Teissier du Cros (Ed.) (2001) Forest Genetic Resources Management and Conservation. France as a
case study. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Bureau of Genetic Resources. INRA DIC. France.
- Cornell University: Elm hybrids (pdf file)
- Elwes, H. J. & Henry, A. (1913). The Trees of Great Britain & Ireland. Vol. VII. pp 1848-1929. Private
publication [12]
- Fu, L., Xin, Y. & Whittemore, A. (2002). Ulmaceae, in Wu, Z. & Raven, P. (eds) Flora of China, Vol. 5
(Ulmaceae through Basellaceae). Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, USA. [13]
- Girard, S. (2007). Dossier: L'orme: nouveaux espoirs? Forêt entreprise No. 175, Juillet 2007, Institut pour le
developpement forestier, Paris.
- Heybroek, H. M. (1983). Resistant Elms for Europe. In Burdekin, D. A. (Ed.) Research on Dutch elm disease in Europe. For.
Comm. Bull. 60. pp 108 - 113.
- Heybroek, H. M. (1993). The Dutch Elm Breeding Program. In Sticklen & Sherald (Eds.) (1993). Dutch Elm Disease
Research, Chapter 3. Springer Verlag, New York, USA
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. Lutèce®, a resistant variety brings elms back to Paris. [14], Paris, France.
- Martín-Benito D., Concepción García-Vallejo M., Pajares J. A., López D. 2005. Triterpenes in elms in Spain. Can. J. For.
Res. 35: 199–205 (2005). [15]
- Melville, R. & Heybroek, H. (1971). Elms of the Himalaya. Kew Bulletin, Vol. 26 (1). Kew, London.
- Mittempergher, L. & Santini, A. (2004) The history of elm breeding. Investigacion agraria: Sistemas y recursos
forestales 13(1): 161-177 (2004).
- Pajares, J. A., García, S., Díez, J. J., Martín, D. & García-Vallejo, M. C. 2004. Feeding responses by Scolytus scolystus
to twig bark extracts from elms. Invest Agrar: Sist Recur For. 13: 217-225. [16]
- Richens, R. H. (1983). Elm. Cambridge University Press.
- Santamour, J., Frank, S. & Bentz, S. (1995). Updated checklist of elm (Ulmus) cultivars for use in North America.
Journal of Arboriculture, 21:3 (May 1995), 121-131. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
- Santini, A., Fagnani, A., Ferrini, F. & Mittempergher, L. (2002). 'San Zanobi' & 'Plinio' Elm Trees.
HortScience, Vol. 37 (7) : 1139-1141. Dec. 2002.
- Santini A., Fagnani A., Ferrini F., Mittempergher L., Brunetti M., Crivellaro A., Macchioni N., Elm breeding for DED
resistance, the Italian clones and their wood properties. Invest Agrar: Sist. Recur. For (2004) 13 (1), 179-184. 2004.
[17]
- Smalley, E. B. & Guries, R. P. (1993). Breeding Elms for Resistance to Dutch Elm Disease. Annual Review of
Phytopathology Vol. 31 : 325-354. Palo Alto, California.
- Solla, A., Bohnens, J., Collin, E., Diamandis, S., Franke, A., Gil, L., Burón, M., Santini, A., Mittempergher, L., Pinon, J.,
and Vanden Broeck, A. (2005). Screening European Elms for Resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Science 51(2) 2005.
Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
- Ware, G. (1995). Little-known elms from China: landscape tree possibilities. Journal of Arboriculture, (Nov. 1995).
International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, USA. [18].
- ^ [1] Wheeler, William Adolphusand Wheeler, Charles Gardner, Familiar Allusions:
A Hand-book of Miscellaneous Information, 1881, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, page 268, accessed Google digitized version
October 20, 2007
- ^ [2]Web page
titled "Pullen's tree, Pullen's Lane, Headington" at the "Headington Website", accessed October
20, 2007
- ^ a b [3]Platt, Rutherford, "1001 Questions Answered About Trees", 1992, Courier Dover
Publications, ISBN 0486270386, accessed October 20, 2007
- ^ a b [4]Web page titled "Arthur Lee Jacobson: Trees of the Washington State Capitol Campus" at the Web site of
Arthur Lee Jacobson (author of Trees of Seattle), text was part of a brochure, "originally published in 1993 as a 14-page
brochure produced by the Washington State House of Represetatives", according to the Web page, accessed October 20, 2007
- ^ [5]"Big Day for Curio Hunter When Famous Elm is Cut", no byline, article in The
Harvard Crimson, October 23, 1920, accessed
October 20, 2007
- ^ [6]Jack, J. G., "The Cambridge Washington Elm", article in the "Bulletin of Popular
Information" of Harvard University's Arnold Arboretum, December 10, 1931, accessed October 20, 2007
- ^ [7]"The Elm
Tree Project: Brown’s once-mighty 'Elmo' is preserved through artists’ project", May 14,
2004, "Contact Mary Jo Curtis", accessed October 20,
2007
- ^ [8]Web page titled "Association Island's History" at the Web site of the Association
Island resort, accessed October 20, 2007
External links
- [19]. Northern
Arizona University: Elm trials.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)