Written by ajmanitara
Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel (February 16, 1834 — August 9, 1919),[1] also written von Haeckel, was an eminent German biologist, naturalist, philosopher, physician, professor and
artist. Ernst Haeckel named thousands of new species (see
below), mapped a genealogical tree relating all life forms, and coined many terms in
biology, including phylum, phylogeny, ecology and the kingdom Protista (details below). Haeckel promoted Charles Darwin's work in
Germany and developed the controversial "recapitulation
theory" claiming that an individual organism's biological development, or ontogeny,
parallels and summarizes its species' entire evolutionary development, or phylogeny:
"ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" (see below).
The published artwork of Haeckel includes over 100 detailed, multi-color illustrations of animals and sea creatures (see:
Kunstformen der Natur, "Artforms of Nature"). As a philosopher, Ernst
Haeckel wrote Die Welträthsel (1895-1899, in English, The Riddle of the Universe, 1901), the genesis for the term
"world riddle" (Welträthsel); and Freedom in Science and Teaching[2] to support teaching evolution.
In the United States, Mount Haeckel, a 13,418-ft (4,090 m) summit in the Eastern Sierra Nevada, overlooking the Evolution Basin, is named in his honor, as are another Mount
Haeckel, a 2,941-m (9,649-ft) summit in New Zealand; and
the asteroid 12323 Häckel.
The Ernst Haeckel house ("Villa Medusa") in Jena, Germany
contains a historic library.
Life
Ernst Haeckel was born on February 16, 1834, in
Potsdam (then part of Prussia). [3] In 1852,
Haeckel completed studies at Cathedral High School (Domgymnasium) of Mersburg.[3] He then studied medicine in Berlin, particularly with Albert von Kölliker, Franz Leydig, Rudolf Virchow (with whom he later worked briefly as assistant), and with anatomist-physiologist
Johannes Peter Müller (1801-1858).[3] In 1857, Haeckel attained a
doctorate in medicine (M.D.), and afterwards he received a license to practice medicine. The occupation of physician appeared less worthwhile to Haeckel, after contact with suffering patients.[3]
Haeckel studied under Carl Gegenbaur at the University of Jena for three years, earning a doctorate in zoology,[3] before
becoming a professor of comparative anatomy at the University of Jena, where he remained 47 years, from 1862-1909. Between 1859 and 1866, Haeckel worked on many "invertebrate" groups,
including radiolarians, poriferans (sea sponges) and annelids (segmented worms).[4] During a trip to the Mediterranean, Haeckel named nearly 150 new species of radiolarians.[4] [4] Haeckel named thousands of new species from 1859 to 1887.
[5]
From 1866 to 1867, Haeckel made an extended journey to the Canary Islands and during this time, Haeckel met with Charles
Darwin, Thomas Huxley and Charles
Lyell.[3] In 1867, he married Agnes Huschke. Their son Walter was born in 1868, their daughters
Elizabeth in 1871 and Emma in 1873.[3] In 1869, he traveled as a researcher
to Norway, in 1871 to Dalmatia, and in 1873 to Egypt, Turkey, and to Greece.[3] Haeckel retired from teaching in
1909, and in 1910 he withdrew from the Evangelical
church.[3] Haeckel's wife, Agnes, died in
1915, and Ernst Haeckel became substantially more frail, with a broken leg (thigh) and broken
arm.[3] He sold the mansion Medusa
("Villa Medusa") in 1918 to the Carl Zeiss foundation.[3] Ernst Haeckel died on August 9,
1919.
Politics
Haeckel's writings and lectures were later used to provide scientific justifications for racism, nationalism, and social
Darwinism.
Haeckel's statement that "politics is applied biology", has been quoted in support of various Nazi philosophies. The Nazi party used not only Haeckel's quotations, but
also Haeckel's broader philosophy of "Monism," which they used as justification for racism, nationalism and social
Darwinism.[4]
Haeckel extrapolated a new religion or philosophy called "monism" from evolutionary science.
In his monism, which postulates that all aspects of the world form an essential unity, all economics, politics, and ethics are reduced
to "applied biology." He also suggested that the development of races paralleled the development of individuals. He advocated the
idea that primitive races were in their infancies and needed the supervision and protection of more mature societies.
"First World War"
Haeckel was the first person known to coin the term First World War. Shortly after the start of World War I, Haeckel wrote:
| “ |
There is no doubt the the course and character of the feared "European War"...will
become the first world war the full sense of the word.
Indianapolis Star September 20,
1914[6]
|
” |
This the first known instance of the term First World War, which had previously been recorded as 1931 for the earliest
usage.
Research
Haeckel was a zoologist, an accomplished artist and illustrator, and later a professor of comparative anatomy. Although Haeckel's ideas are
important to the history of evolutionary theory, and he was a competent
invertebrate anatomist most famous for his work on
radiolaria, many speculative concepts that he championed are now considered incorrect. For
example, Haeckel described and named hypothetical ancestral microorganisms that have never
been found.
He was one of the first to consider psychology as a branch of physiology. He also proposed many now ubiquitous terms including "phylum", "phylogeny", "ecology" ("oekologie"),[5] and proposed the kingdom Protista[3] in
1866. His chief interests lay in evolution and life development
processes in general, including development of nonrandom form, which culminated in the beautifully illustrated
Kunstformen der Natur (Art forms of nature). Haeckel did not support
natural selection, rather believing in a Lamarckian inheritance of acquired
characteristics (Lamarckism). [7]
Haeckel advanced the "recapitulation theory" which proposed a link between
ontogeny (development of form) and phylogeny
(evolutionary descent), summed up in the phrase "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny". His concept of recapitulation has been
disputed in the form he gave it (now called "strong recapitulation").[8] He supported the theory with embryo drawings that have since
been shown to be oversimplified and in part inaccurate, and the theory is now considered an oversimplification of quite
complicated relationships. Haeckel introduced the concept of "heterochrony", which is the
change in timing of embryonic development over the course of evolution.
Haeckel was a flamboyant figure. He sometimes took great (and non-scientific) leaps from available evidence. For example, at
the time that Darwin first published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection (1859), no remains of human ancestors had yet been found. Haeckel postulated
that evidence of human evolution would be found in the Dutch East Indies (now
Indonesia), and described these theoretical remains in great detail. He even named the
as-of-yet unfound species, Pithecanthropus alalus, and charged his students to go find it. (Richard and Oskar Hertwig were two of Haeckel's many important students.)
One student did find the remains: a young Dutchman named Eugene Dubois went to the
East Indies and dug up the remains of Java Man, the first human
ancestral remains ever found. These remains originally carried Haeckel's Pithecanthropus
label, though they were later reclassified as Homo erectus.
Romanes (1892) copy of Haeckel's controversial
embryological drawings. Haeckel's embryos
were shown on a black background, with lighter shading in the figures: It is claimed Haeckel emphasised the similarities
unduly.
"Infamous" embryo drawings
It has been claimed (Richardson 1998, Richardson and Keuck 2002) that some of Haeckel's embryo drawings of 1874 were fabricated.[9] [10] There were multiple
versions of the embryo drawings, and Haeckel rejected the claims of fraud but did admit one error which he corrected. It was
later said that "there is evidence of sleight of hand" on both sides of the feud between Haeckel and Wilhelm His, Sr..[11] The
controversy involves several different issues (see more details at: recapitulation
theory).
Some creationists have claimed that Darwin relied on Haeckel's embryo drawings as proof
of evolution[12] [13] [14] implying that Darwin's theory is therefore illegitimate and possibly fraudulent. This claim
ignores the fact that the Darwin published the "Origin of the Species" in 1859, and "The Descent of Man" in 1871, whereas
Haeckel's famous embryo drawings did not appear until 1874 (8 species). In "The Descent of Man" (1871) Darwin used only two
embryo drawings, neither taken from Haeckel[15].
It has been claimed that Ernst Haeckel sent a letter to the January 9 1909 publication of "Münchener Allgemeine Zeitung" (translated: "Munich general newspaper") which reads,
translated: "a small portion of my embryo-pictures (possibly 6 or 8 in a hundred) are really (in Dr Brass’s sense of the word)
“falsified” — all those, namely, in which the disclosed material for inspection is so incomplete or insufficient that one is
compelled in a restoration of a connected development series to fill up the gaps through hypotheses, and to reconstruct the
missing members through comparative syntheses. What difficulties this task encounters, and how easily the draughts- man may
blunder in it, the embryologist alone can judge."
Publications
Haeckel's literary output was extensive, working as a professor at the University of Jena for 47 years, and even at the time of the celebration of his
sixtieth birthday at Jena in 1894, Haeckel had produced 42 works with
nearly 13,000 pages, besides numerous scientific memoirs and illustrations. [16]
Haeckel's monographs include: Radiolaria (1862),
Siphonophora (1869), Monera (1870) and Calcareous
Sponges (1872), as well as several Challenger reports: Deep-Sea Medusae
(1881), Siphonophora (1888), Deep-Sea Keratosa
(1889), and another Radiolaria (1887), the last being
illustrated with 140 plates and enumerating over four thousand (4000) new species.[16]
Among his many books, Ernst Haeckel wrote General Morphology (1866); Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte
(1868, in English, The Natural History of Creation reprinted 1883); Freie Wissenschaft und freie Lehre (1877, in English, Freedom in
Science and Teaching) in reply to a speech in which Virchow objected to the teaching
of evolution in schools, on the grounds that evolution was an unproven hypothesis;[16] Die systematische Phylogenie
(1894, "Systematic Phylogeny"), which has been considered as his best book,[16] Anthropogenie (1874, 5th and enlarged edition 1903), dealing with the evolution of man; Die
Welträthsel (1895-1899, also spelled Die Welträtsel
("world-riddle"), in English The Riddle of the Universe, 1901);[16] Über unsere
gegenwärtige Kenntnis vom Ursprung des Menschen (1898, translated into English as The Last
Link, 1808); Der Kampf um den Entwickelungsgedanken (1905,
English version, Last Words on Evolution, 1906); Die Lebenswunder (1904, "Wonder of Life"), a supplement to the Riddle of the Universe; also books of travel, such as
Indische Reisebriefe (1882, "Travel notes of India") and
Aus Insulinde: Malayische Reisebriefe (1901, "Travel notes of Malaysia"), the fruits of journeys to Ceylon and to Java; Kunstformen der Natur (1904, Artforms of Nature), with plates representing detailed marine animal forms; and Wanderbilder
(1905, "travel images"), with reproductions of his oil-paintings and water-color
landscapes.[16]
See also
Notes
- ^ "Ernst Haeckel - Britannica Concise" (biography),
Encyclopædia Britannica Concise, 2006, Concise. Britannica.com webpage:
"wpext">CBritannica-Haeckel.
- ^ 1877, English 1879, ISBN 1410211754.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "Ernst Haeckel" (article), German Wikipedia, October 26, 2006,
webpage: DE-Wiki-Ernst-Haeckel:
last paragraph of "Leben" (Life) section.
- ^ a b c d
- ^ a b "Rudolf Steiner and Ernst Haeckel"
(colleagues), Daniel Hindes, 2005, DefendingSteiner.com webpage: Steiner-Haeckel.
- ^ "The Yale Book of Quotations" (2006) Yale University Press, edited by Fred R. Shapiro
- ^ Ruse, M. 1979. The Darwinian Revolution. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
- ^ Richardson and Keuck, (Biol. Review (2002), 77, pp. 495-528) show that it
is a simplification to suppose that Haeckel held the recapitualtion theory in its strong form. They quote Haeckel as saying "If
[recapitulation] was always complete, it would be a very easy task to construct whole phylogeny on the basis of ontogeny. ...
There is certainly, even now, a number of lower vertebarte animals (e.g. some Anthozoa and Vermes) where we are authorised to
interpret each embrylogical form directly as the historical representation or portrait-like silhouette of an extinct ancestral
form. But in a great majority of animals, including man, this is not possible because the infinitely varied conditions of
existence have led the embryonic forms themselves to be changed and to partly lose their original condition (Haeckel, 1903: pp.
435-436)"
- ^ Michael K. Richardson. 1998. "Haeckel's embryos continued." Science
281:1289, quoted in NaturalScience.com webpage Re: Ontogeny and phylogeny: A Letter from Richard Bassetti; Editor's note.
- ^ "While some criticisms of the drawings are legitimate, others are more
tenditious", Richardson and Keuck "Haeckel's ABC of evolution and development", Biol. Rev. (2002), 77, pp. 495-528.
Quoted from p. 495.
- ^ Richardson & Keuck 2001. See for example, their Fig. 7, showing His's
drawing of the forelimb of a deer embryo developing a clef, compared with a similar drawing (Sakurai, 1906) showing the forelimb
initially developing as a digital plate with rays. Richardson & Keuck say "Unfortunately His's embryos are mostly at later
stages than the nearly identical early stage embryos illustrated by Haeckel [top row of Haeckel's famous drawing]. Thus they do
not inform the debate and may themselves be disingenuous.", p. 518.
- ^ "Darwin relied on the work of German biologist Ernst Haeckel ... Darwin
based his inference of common ancestry on the belief that the earliest stages of embryo development are the most similar.
Haeckel's drawings, however, entirely omit the earliest stages ...", Jonathan Wells, Survival of the Fakest, The American
Spectator, Dec 2000-Jan 2001. Note however, Darwin (1871) credits Huxley with the idea of comparing the embryos and quoted a
statement by T. Huxley, that it is "quite in the later stages of development that the young human being presents marked
differences from the young ape ..." (from Huxley's Man’s Place in Nature, 1863, p. 67). Note the subtle difference between
Huxley’s claim – the final stages are most different - and what has been said Darwin relied on via Haeckel – that the
earliest stages are the most similar.
- ^ "The Controversy over Evolution in Biology Textbooks" (Texas, Textbooks and
Evolution), Dr. Raymond G. Bohlin (President), Probe Ministries, 2003, Probe.org webpage: ProbeOrg-Textbook-Controversy: mentions
Haeckel drawings.
- ^ "Haeckel's embryos" (of drawings, with detailed quotes by
Haeckel & others), Tony Britain, 2001, AntiEvolution.org webpage: AE-myths.
- ^ Darwin's footnote to Fig. 1 in The Descent of Man (1871) reads
"The human embryo (upper fig.) is from Ecker, 'Icones Phys.,' 1851–1859, tab. xxx. fig. 2. This embryo was ten lines in length,
so that the drawing is much magnified. The embryo of the dog is from Bischoff, 'Entwicklungsgeschichte des Hunde-Eies,' 1845,
tab. xi. fig. 42 B. This drawing is five times magnified, the embryo being 25 days old. The internal viscera have been omitted,
and the uterine appendages in both drawings removed. I was directed to these figures by Prof. Huxley, from whose work, 'Man's
Place in Nature,' the idea of giving them was taken. Häckel has also given analogous drawings in his 'Schöpfungsgeschichte.' "
Note that Darwin mentions the scale of his drawings, whereas Haeckel has been charged with making all his embryos the same size
as a deceptive move. Similarly Darwin mentions what is missing (internal viscera and uterine appendages), whereas Haeckel did
not.
- ^ a b c d e f "Biography of Ernst Heinrich Haeckel, 1834-1919" (article), Missouri
Association for Creation, Inc., based on 1911 Britannica,
webpage: Gennet-Haeckel: life, career
& beliefs.
References
- Charles Darwin (1859). On the Origin of Species (by Means of Natural
Selection). London: John Murray.
- Charles Darwin (2003 edition). The Origin of Species (with introduction by
Julian Huxley). Signet Classics. ISBN 0-451-52906-5.
- Ernst Haeckel, Freedom in Science and Teaching (1879), reprint edition, University Press
of the Pacific, February 2004, paperback, 156 pages, ISBN 1-4102-1175-4.
- Ernst Haeckel, The History of Creation (1868), translated by E. Ray Lankester, Kegan
Paul, Trench & Co., London, 1883, 3rd edition,
Volume 1.
- Ernst Haeckel, Kunstformen der Natur ("Artforms of Nature"),
1904, (from series published 1899-1904): over 100 detailed, multi-color illustrations of animals and sea creatures.
- Ernst Haeckel, The Riddle of the Universe (Die Weltraetsel,
1895-1899), Publisher: Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, 1992, reprint edition, paperback, 405 pages, illustrated,
ISBN 0-87975-746-9.
- Richard Milner, The Encyclopedia of Evolution: Humanity's Search for Its Origins, Henry Holt, 1993.
- Michael K. Richardson, "Haeckel's embryos continued" (article), Science Volume 281:1289, 1998.
- Richardson, M. K. & Keuck, G. (2001) "A question of intent: when is a 'schematic' illustration a fraud?," Nature
410:144 (vol. 410, no. 6825, page 144), March 8, 2001.
Further reading
- Art Forms from the Ocean: The Radiolarian Atlas of 1862, by Ernst Haeckel, Prestel Verlag, 2005, ISBN
3-7913-3327-5.
- Works by
Ernst Haeckel at Project Gutenberg.
- Richardson, Michael K., "Haeckel, embryos, and evolution," Science Vol. 280, no. 5366 (May 15, 1998) p. 983,
985-986.
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
| Persondata |
| NAME |
Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich Philipp August |
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES |
von Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich Philipp August; Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich Philipp August von |
| SHORT DESCRIPTION |
German biologist and philosopher |
| DATE OF BIRTH |
February 16 1834(1834--) |
| PLACE OF BIRTH |
Potsdam, Prussia |
| DATE OF DEATH |
August 9 1919 |
| PLACE OF DEATH |
|
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)