Did you mean: Stephen Harper (Canadian politician), Valerie Harper (Actor), William Rainey Harper (American educator & scholar), Travis Harper (Tampa Bay Devil Rays) More...
|
Results for Stephen Harper
|
On this page:
|
For more information on Stephen Harper, visit Britannica.com.
Canadian politician who has served as the prime minister of Canada since 2006.
| The Right Honourable Stephen Joseph Harper PC, MP, MA |
|
.jpg) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Incumbent | |
| Assumed office February 6, 2006 |
|
| Preceded by | Paul Martin |
| Succeeded by | (incumbent) |
|
Member of Parliament
for Calgary West |
|
| In office 1993 – 1997 |
|
| Preceded by | James Hawkes |
| Succeeded by | Rob Anders |
|
Member of Parliament
for Calgary Southwest |
|
| Incumbent | |
| Assumed office June 28, 2002 |
|
| Preceded by | Preston Manning |
|
|
|
| Born | April 30 1959 Toronto, Ontario |
| Nationality | Canadian |
| Political party | Conservative |
| Spouse | Laureen Harper |
| Residence | 24 Sussex Drive |
| Alma mater | University of Calgary |
| Religion | Christian and Missionary Alliance |
Stephen Joseph Harper (born April 30, 1959) is the 22nd and current Prime Minister of Canada, and leader of the Conservative Party of Canada. Harper became Prime Minister after his party won a minority government in the January 2006 federal election. He is the first ever Prime Minister from his current political party, and the first since 1993 from any "Conservative" party, following twelve years of government by the Liberal Party.
Harper has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for the riding of Calgary Southwest in Alberta since 2002. Earlier, from 1993 to 1997, he was the MP for Calgary West. He was one of the founding members of the Reform Party, but ended his first stint as an MP to join, and shortly thereafter head, the National Citizens Coalition. In 2002, he succeeded Stockwell Day as leader of the Canadian Alliance (the successor to the Reform Party) and returned to Parliament as Leader of the Opposition. In 2003, he reached an agreement with Progressive Conservative leader Peter MacKay for the merger of their two parties to form the Conservative Party of Canada. He was elected as the party's first non-interim leader in March 2004.
Stephen Harper was born in Toronto, the first of three sons of Margaret Johnston and Joseph Harper, an accountant at Imperial Oil.[1] He attended Northlea Public School, while living at 332 Bessborough Avenue in Leaside. Later, while living at 57 Princess Anne Crescent, he attended John G. Althouse Middle School and Richview Collegiate Institute, both in Central Etobicoke. He graduated in 1978, at the top of his class with a 95.7% average, and was a member of Richview Collegiate's team on Reach for the Top, a television quiz show for of Canadian high school students.[2] Harper then enrolled at the University of Toronto but after two months he dropped out, then moved to Edmonton, Alberta, where he found work at Imperial Oil, in the mail room.[3] Later, he would advance to work on the company's computer systems. He took up post-secondary studies again at the University of Calgary, where he completed a Bachelor's degree in economics. He later returned there to earn a Master's degree in economics, completed in 1993. Harper has kept strong links to the University of Calgary, and often guest-lectured there. He is the first prime minister since Lester B. Pearson not to have attended law school.
Harper married Laureen Teskey in 1993. They have two children: Benjamin, born in 1996, and Rachel, born in 1999. He is the third Prime Minister, after Pierre Trudeau and John Turner, to send their children to Rockcliffe Park Public School, in Ottawa. Stephen Harper occasionally[4] attends church at the East Gate Alliance Church in Ottawa,[5] a member of the evangelical Christian and Missionary Alliance.
Harper has several hobbies and has participated in many artistic endeavours. He is an avid fan of ice hockey and of the Calgary Flames, although on a October 4, 2006 Toronto Maple Leafs game, cameras had caught him raising his arms after a Toronto goal which raised questions by hockey fans. His son Ben was wearing a Maple Leaf jersey at the game.[6]
Stephen Harper has ventured into the arena of sports broadcasting. During the TSN broadcast of the Canada-Russia final of the World Junior Hockey Championships, Stephen Harper appeared in an interview and expressed several views on the state of hockey today. Among his comments was his preference for an overtime period in lieu of a shoot-out.[7][8]
He is also currently writing a history book about the sport.[9] His father was also a published author.[10] Harper taped a cameo appearance in an episode of the television show Corner Gas which was aired in spring 2007.[11] Harper reportedly owns a large vinyl record collection and is an avid fan of The Beatles and AC/DC.[12]
Harper became involved in politics as a member of his high school's Young Liberals Club[citation needed]. He later changed his political allegiance because of the Trudeau Liberal government's National Energy Program (NEP), which he thought was harmful to Alberta's energy industry[citation needed]. He became chief aide to Progressive Conservative MP Jim Hawkes in 1985, but later became disillusioned with both the party and the government of Brian Mulroney[citation needed]. Harper was especially critical of the Mulroney government's fiscal policy, and its inability to fully revoke the NEP until 1986. He left the PC Party that same year.[citation needed]
He was then recommended by Western economist Bob Mansell to Preston Manning, the founder and leader of the Reform Party of Canada. Harper impressed Manning[citation needed], who invited him to participate in the party. Harper gave an important speech at Reform's 1987 founding convention in Winnipeg. He became the Reform Party's Chief Policy Officer, and he played a major role in drafting the 1988 election platform. He is credited with creating Reform's campaign slogan, "The West wants in!"[citation needed]
Harper ran for the Canadian House of Commons in the 1988 federal election, appearing on the ballot as Steve Harper in Calgary West. He lost by a wide margin to Hawkes, his former employer. The Reform Party did not win any seats in this election, although party candidate Deborah Grey was elected as the party's first MP in a by-election shortly thereafter. Harper became Grey's executive assistant, and was her chief adviser and speechwriter until 1993.[13] He remained prominent in the Reform Party's national organization in his role as policy chief, encouraging the party to expand beyond its Western base and arguing that strictly regional parties were at risk of being taken over by radical elements.[14] He delivered a speech at the Reform Party's 1991 national convention, in which he condemned extremist views.[15]
Harper's relationship with Manning became strained in 1992, due to conflicting strategies over the Charlottetown Accord. Harper opposed the Accord on principle for ideological reasons, while Manning was initially more open to compromise. Harper also criticized Manning's decision to hire Rick Anderson as an adviser, believing that Anderson was not sufficiently committed to the Reform Party's principles.[16] He resigned as policy chief in October 1992.
Harper stood for office again in the 1993 federal election, and defeated Jim Hawkes amid a significant Reform breakthrough in Western Canada. His campaign likely benefited from a $50,000 print and television campaign organized by the National Citizens Coalition against Hawkes, although the NCC did not endorse Harper directly.[17]
Harper emerged a prominent member of the Reform Party caucus, and earned respect even from political opponents for his intellect and ideological commitment. Author Mordecai Richler once described him as the "one MP of substance" in the party.[18]
Harper was active on constitutional issues during his first term in parliament, and played a prominent role in drafting the Reform Party's strategy for the 1995 Quebec referendum. A long-standing opponent of centralized federalism, he stood with Preston Manning in Montreal to introduce a twenty-point plan to "decentralize and modernize" Canada in the event of a "no" victory.[19] Harper later argued that the "no" side's narrow plurality was a worst-case scenario, in that no-one had won a mandate for change.[20]
Although not associated with the Reform Party's radical wing, Harper expressed socially conservative views on some issues[citation needed]. In 1994, he opposed plans by federal Justice Minister Allan Rock to introduce spousal benefits for same-sex couples. Citing the recent failure of a similar initiative in Ontario, he was quoted as saying, "What I hope they learn is not to get into it. There are more important social and economic issues, not to mention the unity question".[21] Harper also spoke against the possibility of the Canadian Human Rights Commission or the Supreme Court changing federal policy in these and other matters.[22]
At the Reform Party's 1994 policy convention, Harper was part of a small minority of delegates who voted against restricting the definition of marriage to "the union of one man and one woman".[23] He actually opposed both same-sex marriage and mandated benefits for same-sex couples, but argued that political parties should refrain from taking official positions on these and other issues of conscience.[24]
Harper was the only Reform MP to vote for a bill establishing the Canadian gun
registry at second reading stage in 1995, although he voted against it at third reading. He made his initial decision
after concluding that a majority of his constituents supported the measure, but changed his mind after deciding there was
substantial opposition.[25] It was reported in April 1995
that some Progressive Conservatives opposed to
Despite his prominent position in the party, Harper's relationship with the Reform Party leadership was frequently strained.
In early 1994, he criticized a party decision to establish a personal expense account for Preston Manning at a time when other
Reform MPs had been asked to forego parliamentary perquisites.[27] His criticism proved divisive in the party[citation needed], and he was formally rebuked by the
Reform executive council despite winning support from some MPs. His relationship with Manning grew increasingly fractious in the
mid-1990s, and he pointedly declined to express any opinion on Manning's leadership during a 1996 interview.[28] This friction was indicative of a fundamental divide between the two men:
Harper was strongly committed to conservative principles and opposed Manning's inclinations toward
These tensions culminated in late 1996 when Harper announced that he would not be a candidate in the next federal election. He resigned his parliamentary seat on January 14, 1997, the same day that he was appointed as a vice-president of the National Citizens Coalition (NCC), a conservative think-tank and advocacy group.[30] He was promoted to NCC president later in the year.
In April 1997, Harper suggested that the Reform Party was drifting toward social conservatism and ignoring the principles of economic conservatism.[31] The Liberal Party lost seats but managed to retain a narrow majority government in the 1997 federal election, while Reform made only modest gains.
Harper was out of Parliament between 1997 and 2001, though he remained active in political circles, authoring or co-authoring
a number of essays and articles, one of the most notable being the piece written with Tom Flanagan, entitled Our Benign Dictatorship, which argued that the Liberal
Party only retained power through a dysfunctional political system and a divided opposition.[32] After Pierre Elliot Trudeau's death in
2000, Harper also wrote an editorial criticizing Trudeau's policies as they affected Western Canada and accused Trudeau of
promoting "unabashed
Encouraged by senior aides to Ontario Premier Mike Harris, including Tony Clement and Tom Long[citation needed], Harper considered campaigning for the Progressive Conservative Party leadership in 1998.
In late 1999, Harper called for the federal government to establish clear rules for any future Quebec referendum on sovereignty.[35] Some have identified Harper's views as an influence on the Chrétien government's Clarity Act.[36]
When the United Alternative created the Canadian Alliance in 2000 as a successor party to Reform, Harper endorsed Tom Long for the leadership, believing him to be better suited than Manning and third candidate Stockwell Day.[37][38] When Day placed first on the first ballot, Harper said that the Canadian Alliance was shifting "more towards being a party of the religious right".[39] Day won on the second ballot and led the party into the general election with high poll numbers. While the Canadian Alliance gained seats, the planned breakthrough in Ontario did not occur.
Day's leadership became increasingly troubled throughout the summer of 2001, as many MPs began calling for his resignation. In June, the National Post newspaper reported that former Reform MP Ian McClelland was organizing a possible leadership challenge on Harper's behalf.[40] Harper resigned from the NCC presidency in August 2001 to prepare a campaign.[41]
Stockwell Day bowed to pressure[citation needed] and called a new Canadian Alliance leadership race for 2002, and soon declared himself a candidate. Harper emerged as Day's main rival, and declared his own candidacy on December 3, 2001. He eventually won the support of at least 28 Alliance MPs,[42] including Scott Reid, James Rajotte[43] and Keith Martin.[44] During the campaign, Harper reprised his earlier warnings against an alliance with Quebec nationalists, and called for his party to become the federalist option in Quebec.[45] He argued that "the French language is not imperilled in Quebec", and opposed "special status" for the province in the Canadian Constitution accordingly.[46] He also endorsed greater provincial autonomy on Medicare, and said that he would not co-operate with the Progressive Conservatives as long as they were led by Joe Clark.[47] On social issues, Harper argued for "parental rights" to use corporal punishment against their children and supported raising the age of sexual consent.[48] He described his potential support base as "similar to what George Bush tapped".[49]
The tone of the leadership contest turned hostile in February 2002. Harper described Day's governance of the party as "amateurish",[50] while his campaign team argued that Day was attempting to win re-election by building a narrow support base among different groups in the religious right.[51] The Day campaign accused Harper of "attacking ethnic and religious minorities".[52] In early March, the two candidates had an especially fractious debate on CBC Newsworld.[53] The leadership vote was held on March 20, 2002. Harper was elected on the first ballot with 55% support, against 37% for Day. Two other candidates split the remainder.
After winning the party leadership, Harper announced his intention to run for parliament in a by-election in Calgary Southwest, recently vacated by Preston
Manning. Ezra Levant had already been chosen as the riding's Alliance candidate and
initially declared that he would not stand aside for Harper; he subsequently reconsidered.[54] The Liberals did not field a candidate, following a parliamentary tradition of
allowing opposition leaders to enter the House of Commons unopposed. The Progressive Conservative candidate, Jim Prentice, also chose to withdraw.[55] Harper was elected without difficulty over New
Democrat Bill Phipps, a former
Harper officially became Leader of the Opposition in May 2002. Later in the same month, he said that the Atlantic Provinces were trapped in "a culture of defeat" which had to be overcome, the result of policies designed by Liberal and Progressive Conservative governments. Many Atlantic politicians condemned the remark as patronizing and insensitive. The Legislature of Nova Scotia unanimously approved a motion condemning Harper's comments,[57] which were also criticized by New Brunswick Premier Bernard Lord, federal Progressive Conservative leader Joe Clark and others. Harper refused to apologize, and said that much of Canada was trapped by the same "can't-do" attitude.[58]
His first 18 months as opposition leader were largely devoted towards consolidating the fractured elements of the Canadian Alliance and encouraging a union of the Canadian Alliance and the federal Progressive Conservatives[citation needed]. The aim of this union was to present only one right-of-centre national party in the next federal election, thus preventing the vote-splitting of the past[citation needed]. In undertaking the merger talks, PC leader Peter MacKay reversed his previous agreement with leadership opponent David Orchard not to merge with the Alliance. After reaching an agreement with MacKay in October 2003, the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada officially merged in December, with the new party being named the "Conservative Party of Canada".[citation needed]
Harper is reported List of Bilderberg attendees|to have attended the 2003 meeting of the Bilderberg Group.[59]
On January 12, 2004, Harper announced his resignation as Leader of the Opposition, in order to run for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada. Harper won the Conservative leadership election easily, with a first ballot majority against Belinda Stronach and Tony Clement on March 20, 2004. Harper's victory included strong showings in Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic Canada.
Harper led the Conservatives into the 2004 federal election. Initially, new Prime Minister Paul Martin held a large lead in polls, but this eroded due to infighting, Adscam and other scandals surrounding his government. The Liberals attempted to counter this with an early election call, as this would give the Conservatives less time to consolidate their merger.
Martin's weak performance in the leader's debate, along with an unpopular provincial budget by Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty, moved the Conservatives into a lead for a time. However, comments by Conservative MPs, leaked press releases slandering the then Prime Minister, as well as controversial TV attack ads suggesting that the Conservatives would make Canada more like the United States, caused Harper's party to lose some momentum.
Harper made an effort to appeal to voters in Quebec, a province where the Reform/Alliance side of the merged party hadn't done well. He was featured in several of the Tories' French-language campaign ads.
The Liberals were re-elected to power with a minority government, with the Conservatives coming in second place. The Conservatives managed to make inroads into the Liberals' Ontario stronghold, primarily in the province's socially conservative central region. However, they were shut out of Quebec, marking the first time that a centre-right party did not win any seats in that province. Harper, after some personal deliberation, decided to stay on as the party leader. Many credited him with bringing the Progressive Conservative Party and Canadian Alliance together in a short time to fight a close election.
The Conservative Party's first policy convention was held from March 17–19, 2005, in Montreal. Harper had been rumoured to be shifting his ideology closer to that of a Blue Tory, and many thought he'd wanted to move the party's policies closer to the centre. Any opposition to abortion or bilingualism was dropped from the Conservative platform. Harper received an 84% endorsement from delegates in the leadership review.
Despite the party's move to the centre, the party began a concerted drive against same-sex marriage. Harper was criticized by a group of law professors for arguing that the government could override the provincial court rulings on same-sex marriage without using the "notwithstanding clause", a provision of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It also argued, in general, for lower taxes, an elected Senate, a tougher stance on crime, and closer relations with the United States.
Following the April 2005 release of Jean Brault's damaging testimony at the Gomery Inquiry, implicating the Liberals in the scandal, opinion polls placed the Conservatives ahead of Liberals. The Conservatives had earlier abstained from the vote on the 2005 budget to avoid forcing an election. With the collapse in Liberal support and a controversial NDP amendment to the budget, the party exerted significant pressure on Harper to bring down the government. In May, Harper announced that the government had lost the "moral authority to govern". Shortly thereafter, the Conservatives and Bloc Québécois united to defeat the government on a vote that some considered to be either be a confidence motion or else a motion requiring an immediate test of the confidence of the House. The Martin government did not accept this interpretation and argued that vote had been on a procedural motion, although they also indicated that they would bring forward their revised budget for a confidence vote the following week. Ultimately, the effort to bring down the Government failed following the decision of Conservative MP Belinda Stronach to cross the floor to the Liberal Party. The vote on the NDP amendment to the budget tied, and with the Speaker of the House voting to continue debate, the Liberals stayed in power. At the time, some considered the matter to be a constitutional crisis.[60][61]
Harper was also criticized for supporting his caucus colleague MP Gurmant Grewal[citation needed]. Grewal had produced tapes of conversations with Tim Murphy, Paul Martin's chief of staff, in which Grewal claimed he had been offered a cabinet position in exchange for his defection. Some experts analyzed the tapes and concluded that a digital copy of the tapes had been edited.
The Liberals' support dropped after the first report from the Gomery Inquiry was issued. On November 24, 2005, Harper introduced a motion of no confidence on the Liberal government, telling the House of Commons "that this government has lost the confidence of the House of Commons and needs to be removed." As the Liberals had lost NDP support in the house by refusing to accept an NDP plan to prevent health care privatization, the no confidence motion was passed by a vote of 171-133. It was the first time that a Canadian government had been toppled by a straight motion of no confidence proposed by the opposition. As a result, Parliament was dissolved and a general election was scheduled for January 232006.
The Conservatives began the campaign period with a policy-per-day strategy, contrary to the Liberal plan of holding off major announcements until after the Christmas holidays, so Harper dominated media coverage for the first weeks of the election. Though his party showed only modest movement in the polls, Harper's personal numbers, which had always significantly trailed those of his party, began to rise.
In response, the Liberals launched negative ads targeting Harper, similar to their attacks in the 2004 election. However, their tactics were not sufficient to erode the Conservative's advantage, although they did manage to close what had been a ten point advantage in public opinion. As Harper's personal numbers rose, polls found he was now considered not only more trustworthy, but a better choice for Prime Minister than Martin.[62]
Immediately prior to the Christmas break, in a faxed letter to NDP candidate Judy Wasylycia-Leis, the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Giuliano Zaccardelli announced the RCMP had opened a criminal investigation into her complaint that it appeared Liberal Finance Minister Ralph Goodale's office had engaged in insider trading before making an important announcement on the taxation of income trusts. On December 27, 2005, the RCMP confirmed that information in a press release. (At the conclusion of the investigation. Serge Nadeau, a top Finance Department bureaucrat, was charged with criminal breach of trust. No charges were laid against then-Finance Minister Ralph Goodale.)[63]
The election resulted in a minority government, and shortly after midnight on January 24, Martin conceded defeat to Harper. Later that day, he informed Governor General Michaëlle Jean that he would resign as Prime Minister. At 6:45 p.m., Jean asked Harper to form a government. He was sworn in as Canada's 22nd Prime Minister on February 6, 2006.
Unlike his recent predecessors, Harper did not name one of his colleagues to the largely honorific post of
Harper indicated a desire to turn the Canadian Senate into an elected rather than an appointed body, an objective previously proposed by the former Reform Party of Canada[citation needed]. His desire includes fixed election dates with earlier elections possible in the case of minority governments. On September 7, 2006, Harper became the first Canadian Prime Minister to appear before a Senate committee and was present to make his government's case for Senate reform.
After sidestepping the political landmine for most of the first year of his time as prime minister, much as all the post-Charlottetown Accord prime ministers had done, Harper's hand was forced to reopen the Quebec sovereignty debate after the opposition Bloc Quebecois were to introduce a motion in the House that called for recognition of Quebec as a "nation." On November 22, 2006, Harper introduced his own motion to recognize that "the Québecois form a nation within a united Canada."[64] Five days later, Harper's motion passed, with a margin of 266-16; all federalist parties, as well as the Bloc Quebecois, were formally behind it.[65]
Harper has insisted on his right to choose who asks questions at press conferences, [66] which has caused the national media to lodge complaints.[67] Some have alleged that the Prime Minister's Office also "often informs the media about Harper's trips at such short notice that it's impossible for Ottawa journalists to attend the events".[68] Harper's director of communications has denied this, saying that "this prime minister has been more accessible, gives greater media scrums and provides deeper content than any prime minister has in the last 10 to 12 years". Some suggest that the Conservatives' recent electoral success was credited to their control of the campaign message, a practice that they continued when they became the government.[1]
On March 11 and March 122006, Harper made a surprise trip to Afghanistan, where Canadian Forces personnel were deployed since late 2001, to visit troops in theatre as a show of support for their efforts, and as a demonstration of the government's commitment to reconstruction and stability in the region. Harper's choice of a first foreign visit was closely guarded from the press until his arrival in Afghanistan (citing security concerns), and is seen as marking a significant change in relationship between the government and the military. While other foreign leaders have visited Afghanistan, Harper's trip was touted as unprecedented in its length and scope.[2] Harper returned to Afghanistan on May 22, 2007, in a surprise two-day visit which included visiting Canadian troops at the forward operating base at Ma'Sum Ghar, located 25 kilometers South of Kandahar, making Harper the first Prime Minister to visit the front lines of a combat operation.[3]
At the outset of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict, Harper defended Israel's "right to defend itself" and described its military campaign in Lebanon as a "measured" response, arguing that Hezbollah's release of kidnapped IDF soldiers would be the key to ending the conflict.[69] Some Canadians, including many Arab-Canadians, criticized Harper's description of the Israeli response as "measured". On July 17, 2006, Harper noted that the situation had deteriorated since his initial comments, but that it was difficult for Israel to fight "non-governmental forces" embedded in the civilian population. Harper reiterated his earlier support for Israel and called on both sides to show restraint and minimize civilian casualties.
Speaking of the situation in both Lebanon and Gaza on July 18, Harper told reporters, "We all want to encourage not just a ceasefire, but a resolution. And a resolution will only be achieved when everyone gets to the table and everyone admits...recognition of each other," referring to the refusal of Hezbollah and Hamas to recognize Israel's right to exist. Harper laid the blame for the civilian deaths on both sides at the feet of Hezbollah. "Hezbollah's objective is violence," Harper asserted, "Hezbollah believes that through violence it can create, it can bring about the destruction of Israel. Violence will not bring about the destruction of Israel... and inevitably the result of the violence will be the deaths primarily of innocent people."[70]
On June 7, 2007, the Conservative government announced it had finalized free trade negotiations with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)[4]. Under this agreement, Canada will increase its trade ties with Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. In 2006, the value of trade between these partners was $10.7 billion. Canada had originally began negotiations with the EFTA on October 9, 1998, but talks broke down due to a disagreement over the subsidies of shipyards in Atlantic Canada.[5]
On September 11, 2007, Harper became the first Canadian Prime Minister, since Confederation, to address the Parliament of Australia.[6]
Shortly after being congratulated by George W. Bush for his victory, Harper rebuked U.S. Ambassador David Wilkins for criticizing the Conservatives' plans to assert Canada's sovereignty over the Arctic Ocean waters with armed forces[citation needed]. Harper's first meeting with the U.S. President occurred at the end of March, 2006; and while little was achieved in the way of solid agreements[citation needed], the trip was described in the media as signalling a trend of closer relations between the two nations.
Harper chose the following jurists to be appointed as justices of the Supreme Court of Canada by the Governor General:
In keeping with Harper's election promise for such changes to the process, Rothstein's appointment involved the innovation of a review by a parliamentary committee, following his nomination by the Prime Minister. Rothstein had already been short-listed, with two other candidates, by a committee convened by the previous Liberal government, and he was Harper's choice. Harper then had Rothstein appear before an 'ad hoc', non-partisan committee of 12 Members of Parliament. This committee was not empowered to block the appointment, though, as had been called for by some members of Harper's Conservative Party.[71]
Harper also received the Woodrow Wilson Award on October 6 2006 for his public service in Calgary. It was held at the Telus Convention Centre in Calgary, the same place where he made his victory speech.[citation needed]Time magazine named him as Canada's Newsmaker of the Year in 2006. Stephen Handelman wrote "that the prime minister who was once dismissed as a doctrinaire backroom tactician with no experience in government has emerged as a warrior in power." [72]
|- |bgcolor="cornflowerblue"| |Conservative |(x)Stephen Harper |align="right"|41,549 |align="right"|72.36 |align="right"| |- |bgcolor="lightcoral"| |Liberal |Mike Swanson |align="right"|6,553 |align="right"|11.41 |align="right"| |- |bgcolor="sandybrown"| |New Democratic Party |Holly Heffernan |align="right"|4,628 |align="right"|8.06 |align="right"| |- |bgcolor="yellowgreen"| |Green |Kim Warnke |align="right"|4,407 |align="right"|7.68 |align="right"| |- |bgcolor="#CC6699"| |Christian Heritage |Larry R. Heather |align="right"|279 |align="right"|0.49 |align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Total valid votes !align="right"|57,416 !align="right"|100.00 !align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Total rejected ballots !align="right"|120 !align="right"| !align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Turnout !align="right"|57,536 !align="right"| !align="right"| |}
|- |bgcolor="cornflowerblue"| |Conservative
|(x)Stephen Harper |align="right"|35,297 |align="right"|68.36 |align="right"|$62,952.76
|- |bgcolor="lightcoral"| |Liberal |Avalon Roberts |align="right"|9,501 |align="right"|18.40
|align="right"|$43,846.23 |- |bgcolor="yellowgreen"| |Green |Darcy Kraus
|align="right"|3,210 |align="right"|6.22 |align="right"|$534.96 |- |bgcolor="sandybrown"|
|New Democratic Party |Daria Fox |align="right"|2,884 |align="right"|5.59
|align="right"|$3,648.70 |- |bgcolor="tan"| |Marijuana |Mark de Pelham |align="right"|516 |align="right"|1.00
|align="right"|$0.00 |- |bgcolor="#CC6699"| |Christian Heritage |Larry R. Heather
|align="right"|229 |align="right"|0.44 |align="right"|$985.59 |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Total valid
votes !align="right"|51,637 !align="right"|100.00 !align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Total rejected
ballots !align="right"|149 !align="right"| !align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Turnout
!align="right"|51,786 !align="right"|64.49 !align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Electors on the lists
!align="right"|80,296 !align="right"| !align="right"| |}
|- |bgcolor="cadetblue"| |Canadian Alliance |Stephen Harper |align="right"|13,200 |align="right"|71.66 |align="right"|$58,959.16 |-
|bgcolor="sandybrown"| |New Democratic Party
|Bill Phipps |align="right"|3,813 |align="right"|20.70 |align="right"|$34,789.77 |-
|bgcolor="yellowgreen"| |Green |James S. Kohut |align="right"|660 |align="right"|3.58
|align="right"|$2,750.80 |- |bgcolor="gainsboro"| |Independent |Gordon Barrett |align="right"|428 |align="right"|2.32
|align="right"|$3,329.34 |- |bgcolor="#CC6699"| |Christian Heritage |Ron Gray |align="right"|320
|align="right"|1.74 |align="right"|$27,772.78 |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Total valid votes !align="right"|18,421
!align="right"|100.00 !align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Total rejected ballots !align="right"|98
!align="right"| !align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Turnout !align="right"|18,519 !align="right"|23.05
!align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Electors on the lists !align="right"|80,360 !align="right"|
!align="right"| |}
|- |bgcolor="mediumseagreen"| |Reform |Stephen Harper |align="right"|30,209 |align="right"|52.25 |- |bgcolor="lightcoral"|
|Liberal |Karen Gainer |align="right"|15,314 |align="right"|26.49 |-
|bgcolor="#9999FF"| |Progressive
Conservative |(x)James Hawkes |align="right"|9,090 |align="right"|15.72 |-
|bgcolor="sandybrown"| |New Democratic Party
|Rudy Rogers |align="right"|1,194
|align="right"|2.06 |- |bgcolor="mediumturquoise"| |National |Kathleen
McNeil |align="right"|1,068 |align="right"|1.85 |- |bgcolor="lavender"| |Natural Law |Frank Haika |align="right"|483 |align="right"|0.84 |-
|bgcolor="yellowgreen"| |Green |Don Francis |align="right"|347 |align="right"|0.60 |-
|bgcolor="#CC6699"| |Christian Heritage
|Larry R. Heather |align="right"|116 |align="right"|0.20 |- bgcolor="white"
!align="right" colspan=3|Total valid votes !align="right"|57,821 !align="right"|100.00 |- bgcolor="white" !align="right"
colspan=3|Total rejected ballots !align="right"|133 !align="right"| |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Turnout
!align="right"|57,954 !align="right"|66.29 |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Electors on the lists
!align="right"|87,421 !align="right"| |}
|- |bgcolor="#9999FF"| |Progressive
Conservative |(x)James Hawkes |align="right"|32,025 |align="right"|58.52 |-
|bgcolor="mediumseagreen"| |Reform |Steve Harper |align="right"|9,074 |align="right"|16.58 |- |bgcolor="lightcoral"|
|Liberal |John Phillips |align="right"|6,880 |align="right"|12.57 |-
|bgcolor="sandybrown"| |New Democratic Party
|Richard D. Vanderberg
|align="right"|6,355 |align="right"|11.61 |- |bgcolor="green"| |Libertarian |David Faren |align="right"|225 |align="right"|0.41 |-
|bgcolor="#66CC66"| |Confederation of
Regions |Brent Morin
|align="right"|170 |align="right"|0.31 |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Total valid votes !align="right"|54,729
!align="right"|100.00 |- bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Total rejected ballots !align="right"|117 !align="right"| |-
bgcolor="white" !align="right" colspan=3|Turnout !align="right"|54,846 !align="right"|78.75 |- bgcolor="white" !align="right"
colspan=3|Electors on the lists !align="right"|69,650 !align="right"| |}
All electoral information is taken from Elections Canada. Italicized expenditures refer to submitted totals, and are presented when the final reviewed totals are not available.
