- The branch of linguistics that deals with the sounds of speech and their production, combination, description, and representation by written symbols.
- The system of sounds of a particular language.
phonetics
Dictionary:
pho·net·ics (fə-nĕt'ĭks)  |
n. (used with a sing. verb)
| Sci-Tech Encyclopedia: Phonetics |
The science that deals with the production, transmission, and perception of spoken language. At each level, phonetics overlaps with some other sciences, such as anatomy, physiology, acoustics, psychology, and linguistics. In each case, phonetics focuses on phenomena relevant to the study of spoken language.
Speech is normally produced by exhaling air from the lungs through the vocal tract. The vocal tract extends from the larynx through the pharynx and the oral cavity to the lips. If the velum (soft palate) is not raised, the air also passes through the nasal cavities. The shape and size of the oral cavity can be varied by the movement of active articulators: tongue, lips, and velum. See also Palate.
Phoneticians usually describe speech sounds with reference to their point (or place) of articulation and their manner of articulation. The point of articulation of a sound is the place of maximum constriction within the vocal tract. The great majority of sounds are produced by moving some part of the tongue toward some region on the roof of the mouth. Exceptions are articulations involving lips and those sounds in which the vocal folds serve as articulators.
At most of these points of articulation, sounds can be produced with several manners of articulation. One way to classify manners of articulation refers to the degree of stricture employed in producing the sound. Sounds produced with complete constriction of the vocal tract are stops, or plosives. If the closure is incomplete, but the articulators are brought close enough so that the air passing between them is set into turbulent motion, the resultant sounds are fricatives or spirants. If the articulators are approximated, but the constriction remains large enough so that air can pass through without friction, the sounds are called approximants—vowellike sounds functioning as consonants. Most of these consonant sounds can be voiced or voiceless; vowels are normally voiced. The terms “voiced” and “voiceless” refer to the presence and the absence of vocal fold vibration.
Acoustic phonetics deals with the manner in which the spoken message is encoded in the sound waves. According to the generally accepted source-filter theory of speech acoustics, sound is generated at a source (which for phonated speech is constituted by the vibrating vocal folds) and passed through the vocal tract. The opening and closing of the vocal folds create a succession of condensations and rarefactions of air molecules—variations in air pressure—and transform kinetic energy into acoustic energy. The sound wave generated at the glottis can be considered, for practical purposes, a complex periodic wave, and as such it contains energy at frequencies that are multiples of the fundamental frequency (harmonics).
The vocal tract acts as a filter, transmitting more energy at those frequencies that correspond to the resonances of the vocal tract than at other frequencies. Energy concentrations at the resonance frequencies of the vocal tract are referred to as formants.
In principle, the source and filter are independent of each other; consider the fact that the same vowel can be sung at different fundamental frequencies (pitches), and different vowels can be produced at the same pitch. The sound wave can be described by specifying its fundamental frequency, amplitude, and spectrum.
The subject matter of phonetics is not limited to the production and perception of vowels and consonants; of equal importance are such prosodic and suprasegmental aspects of spoken language as duration, fundamental frequency, and intensity, as they determine such linguistically relevant phenomena as tone and intonation, stress and emphasis, and the signaling of various boundaries—boundaries of morphemes and words, phrases, clauses, and sentences. See also Speech.
| Dental Dictionary: phonetics |
(fō-net′iks)
n
n
The study of the production and perception of speech sounds, including individual and group variations and their use in speech.
| Literary Dictionary: phonetics |
phonetics
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: phonetics |
For more information on phonetics, visit Britannica.com.
| Philosophy Dictionary: phonetics |
The study of the characteristics of human sounds, especially those used in speech. Although phonetics is probably the least interesting branch of linguistics to a philosopher, the discovery that individual significant sounds are not physically definable, but exist in context and in contrast with others, was a major impetus to structuralism in many areas. The phoneme is the minimal unit in the sound system of a language.
| Columbia Encyclopedia: phonetics |
phonetics (fōnĕt'ĭks, fə-), study of the sounds of languages from three basic points of view. Phonetics studies speech sounds according to their production in the vocal organs (articulatory phonetics), their physical properties (acoustic phonetics), or their effect on the ear (auditory phonetics). All phonetics are interrelated, since human articulatory and auditory mechanisms correspond to each other and are mediated by wavelength, pitch, and the other physical properties of sound. Systems of phonetic writing are aimed at the accurate transcription of any sequence of speech sounds; the best known is the International Phonetic Alphabet. Narrow transcription specifies as many features of a sound as can be symbolized, while broad transcription specifies only as many features of a sound as are necessary to distinguish it from other sounds. Each language uses a limited number of the humanly possible sounds grouped into phonemes, and the hearer-speaker is trained from childhood to classify them into these groups, rejecting as nonsignificant all sorts of features actually phonetically present. So the English speaker does not notice that he always makes a puff of air when he pronounces the p of pin and never makes the puff with the p of spin; for him they are the same sound. Yet in some languages (as in Sanskrit) just the presence or absence of that puff in both words would indicate a phonemic difference, and two words might differ in meaning because of the puff. In English the two sounds are considered variations of a single sound, the phoneme p, and as such are allophones. In the other situation, aspirated p (p with a puff) and unaspirated p are not allophones but separate phonemes. Phonemes include all significant differences of sound, including features of voicing, place and manner of articulation, accent, and secondary features of nasalization, glottalization, labialization, and the like. Whereas phonetics refers to the study of the production, perception, and physical nature of speech sounds, phonology refers to the study of how such sounds are combined in particular languages and of how they are used to convey meaning. Systematic sound change through time is treated by comparative and historical linguistics. See grammar; language; writing.
Bibliography
See K. Pike, Phonemics (1947); N. Chomsky and M. Halle, The Sound Pattern of English (1968); P. Ladefoged, A Course in Linguistic Phonetics (1982); G. Pullum and W. Ladusaw, Phonetic Symbol Guide (1986); I. R. MacKay, Phonetics (2d ed. 1987).
| World of the Mind: phonetics |
Phonetics, the science of speech sounds, is traditionally divided into two branches: acoustic, concerned with the structure of the acoustic signal itself, and articulatory, concerned with the way these sounds are produced. The most important initial impetus was to develop a standard means for the accurate and convenient transcription of the sounds of various languages and dialects. Proper transcription was regarded as an essential tool for field linguists and missionaries dealing with new languages, and for recording dialectal variations of known languages (and 'correcting' them — e.g. Henry Sweet 1908). The idea of an International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), suitable for all languages, was first suggested by Otto Jespersen in 1886; the International Phonetic Association (which included Paul Passy and Sweet, as well as Jespersen) published the first IPA in 1888. This was based on the articulatory features of the sounds: the place of maximum constriction of the vocal tract, the manner of the constriction (completely closed for consonants like /p/; with the nasal passage open for consonants like /m/, etc.) and the onset of voicing (immediate in the case of /b/, but delayed for /p/). Daniel Jones's classification of the 'cardinal vowels' was similarly based on articulatory features, the height of the tongue, front or back of the mouth, with lips rounded or unrounded. The IPA system enables the transcription of sound distinctions which have no significance for the speaker of one language, though they do for the speaker of another. Thus the initial consonants in 'key' and 'cool' can be heard, and felt, to be different but do not, in English, constitute different phonemes (units of significant sound); in Arabic they do.
Although methods of analysing the frequency components of the acoustic signal had been known since Helmholtz in 1862, no convenient way of plotting frequency, energy, and time was available until the development of the 'sonograph' in the 1940s by R. K. Potter and others. The analysis of the movement of the vocal organs during speech has in recent years been advanced by the use of high-speed film to record the opening and closing of the vocal folds during phonation (though the earliest use of this technique can be traced back to 1913) and by cineradiography. Two surprising and paradoxical results have emerged from these methods of acoustic and articulatory analysis: first, there is no simple correspondence between acoustic parameters and the phenomenological sound. The English phoneme /d/, for example, has a quite different sound depending on the vowel that follows it. Second, there is no simple correspondence between the sound and vocal action used to produce it. These fundamental puzzles have motivated the growth of experimental phonetics, which combines sophisticated analysis and synthesis of speechlike sounds with the investigative procedures of experimental psychology, with the aim of discovering which abstract characterizations of acoustic dimensions are critical in determining the sound contrasts meaningful in language. That is to say, what kinds of representation underlie the perception and production of spoken language?
(Published 1987)
Although methods of analysing the frequency components of the acoustic signal had been known since Helmholtz in 1862, no convenient way of plotting frequency, energy, and time was available until the development of the 'sonograph' in the 1940s by R. K. Potter and others. The analysis of the movement of the vocal organs during speech has in recent years been advanced by the use of high-speed film to record the opening and closing of the vocal folds during phonation (though the earliest use of this technique can be traced back to 1913) and by cineradiography. Two surprising and paradoxical results have emerged from these methods of acoustic and articulatory analysis: first, there is no simple correspondence between acoustic parameters and the phenomenological sound. The English phoneme /d/, for example, has a quite different sound depending on the vowel that follows it. Second, there is no simple correspondence between the sound and vocal action used to produce it. These fundamental puzzles have motivated the growth of experimental phonetics, which combines sophisticated analysis and synthesis of speechlike sounds with the investigative procedures of experimental psychology, with the aim of discovering which abstract characterizations of acoustic dimensions are critical in determining the sound contrasts meaningful in language. That is to say, what kinds of representation underlie the perception and production of spoken language?
(Published 1987)
— Brian Lewis Butterworth
- Bibliography
- Collins, B., and Mees, I. (1999). The Real Professor Higgins: The Life and Career of Daniel Jones.
- MacMahon, M. K. C. (1986). 'The International Phonetic Association: the first 100 years'. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 16.
| Wikipedia: Phonetics |
 |
Please help improve this article by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page. (November 2008) |
| Linguistics |
| Theoretical linguistics |
| Descriptive linguistics |
| Applied linguistics |
| Related articles |
| Portal |
Phonetics (from the Greek: φωνή, phōnē, "sound, voice", pronounced /fɵˈnɛtɨks/) is a branch of linguistics that comprises the study of the sounds of human speech.[1] It is concerned with the physical properties of speech sounds (phones), and their physiological production, auditory perception, and neurophysiological status.
Phonetics was studied as early as 2500 years ago in ancient India, with Pāṇini's account of the place and manner of articulation of consonants in his 5th century BC treatise on Sanskrit. The major Indic alphabets today order their consonants according to Pāṇini's classification.
Contents |
Transcription
Main article: Phonetic transcription
Phonetic transcription is a universal system for transcribing sounds that occur in spoken language. The most widely known system of phonetic transcription, the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), uses a one-to-one mapping between phones and written symbols.[2][3] The standardized nature of the IPA enables its users to transcribe accurately and consistently the phones of different languages, dialects, and idiolects.[2][4][5] The IPA is a useful tool not only for the study of phonetics, but also for language teaching, professional acting, and speech pathology.[6]
Subfields
Phonetics as a research discipline has three main branches:
- articulatory phonetics is concerned with the articulation of speech: The position, shape, and movement of articulators or speech organs, such as the lips, tongue, and vocal folds.
- acoustic phonetics is concerned with acoustics of speech: The properties of the sound waves, such as their frequency and harmonics.
- auditory phonetics is concerned with speech perception: How speech sounds are categorized, recognized, and interpreted by the auditory apparatus and the brain.
Applications
Application of phonetics include:
- forensic phonetics: the use of phonetics (the science of speech) for forensic (legal) purposes.
- Speech Recognition: the analysis and transcription of recorded speech by a computer system.
Relation to phonology
In contrast to phonetics, phonology is the study of how sounds and gestures pattern in and across languages, relating such concerns with other levels and aspects of language. Phonetics deals with the articulatory and acoustic properties of speech sounds, how they are produced, and how they are perceived. As part of this investigation, phoneticians may concern themselves with the physical properties of meaningful sound contrasts or the social meaning encoded in the speech signal (e.g. gender, sexuality, ethnicity, etc.). However, a substantial portion of research in phonetics is not concerned with the meaningful elements in the speech signal.
While phonology is grounded in phonetics, it is a distinct area of linguistics, treating sounds and gestural units as abstract units (e.g, phonemes, features, mora, etc.) and accounting for conditioned variation in the form of grammatical rules (e.g., allophonic rules, constraints, derivational rules).[7] Phonology relates to phonetics via the set of distinctive features, which relate the abstract representations of speech units to speech gestures or acoustic representations.[8][9][10]
See also
- List of phonetics topics
- International Phonetic Alphabet
- Speech processing
- Acoustics
- Biometric word list
- Phonetics departments at universities
- X-SAMPA
- NATO Phonetic Alphabet
- Buckeye Corpus
Notes
- ^ O'Grady (2005) p.15
- ^ a b O'Grady (2005) p.17
- ^ International Phonetic Association (1999) Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Ladefoged, Peter (1975) A Course in Phonetics. Orlando: Harcourt Brace. 5th ed. Boston: Thomson/Wadsworth 2006.
- ^ Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson (1996) The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
- ^ Ladefoged, Peter (1975) A Course in Phonetics. Orlando: Harcourt Brace. 5th ed. Boston: Thomson/Wadsworth 2006.
- ^ Kingston, John. 2007. The Phonetics-Phonology Interface, in The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology (ed. Paul DeLacy), Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Halle, Morris. 1983. On Distinctive Features and their articulatory implementation, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, p. 91 - 105
- ^ Jakobson, Roman, Gunnar Fant, and Morris Halle. 1976. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and their Correlates, MIT Press.
- ^ Hall, T. Allen. 2001. Phonological representations and phonetic implementation of distinctive features, Mouton de Gruyter.
References
O'Grady, William et al (2005). Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction (5th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's. ISBN 0312419368.
External links
- Comparative phonetics
- Translate English texts into IPA phonetics with PhoTransEdit.
- the Web Site of the Phonetic Sciences Laboratory of the Université de Montréal.
- The International Society of Phonetic Sciences (ISPhS)
- A little encyclopedia of phonetics, Peter Roach, Professor of Phonetics, University of Reading, UK. (pdf)
- The sounds and sound patterns of language U Penn
- UCLA lab data
- UCLA Phonetics Lab Archive
- EGG and Voice Quality (electroglottography, phonation, etc.)
- IPA handbook
- IPA-SAM Phonetic Fonts
- Speech Analysis Tutorial
- Lecture materials in German on phonetics & phonology, university of Erfurt
- Real-time MRI video of the articulation of speech sounds, from the USC Speech Articulation and kNowledge (SPAN) Group
- Beginner's course in phonetics, with some exercises
- Praat - Phonetic analysis software
- SID- Speech Internet Dictionary
- Extensive collection of phonetics resources on the Web (University of North Carolina)
- Phonetics and Phonology (University of Osnabrueck)
Further reading
- Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.
- Ashby, Michael & Maidment, John. (2005). Introducing Phonetic Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-80882-0 (hbk); ISBN 0-521-00496-9 (pbk).
- Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental problems in phonetics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-32520-X.
- Clark, John; & Yallop, Colin. (1995). An introduction to phonetics and phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-19452-5.
- Gussenhoven, C & Broeders, A. (1997). English pronunciation for student teachers. Wolters-Noordhoff BV Groningen, the Netherlands. ISBN 90 01 16703 9
- Hardcastle, William J.; & Laver, John (Eds.). (1997). The handbook of phonetic sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-631-18848-7.
- Ladefoged, Peter. (1982). A course in phonetics (2nd ed.). London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Ladefoged, Peter. (2003). Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0-631-23269-9 (hbk); ISBN 0-631-23270-2 (pbk).
- Ladefoged, Peter; Ian Maddieson (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-19814-8.
- Maddieson, Ian. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge studies in speech science and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Laver, J. (1994).Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pike, Kenneth L. (1943). Phonetics: A critical analysis of phonetic theory and a technic for the practical description of sounds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Pisoni, David B.; & Remez, Robert E. (Eds.). (2004). The handbook of speech perception. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-22927-2.
- Rogers, Henry. (2000). The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics. Harlow, Essex: Pearson. ISBN 0-582-38182-7.
- Stevens, Kenneth N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Current studies in linguistics (No. 30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-19404-X.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Translations: Phonetics |
Nederlands (Dutch)
(studie van) spraakklanken
Français (French)
n. - phonétique, phonétique (transcription)
Deutsch (German)
n. - Phonetik, phonetische Umschrift
Ελληνική (Greek)
n. pl. - φωνητική, φωνολογία, φθογγολογία, φωνητικά σύμβολα
Português (Portuguese)
n. pl. - fonética (f)
Español (Spanish)
n. - fonética
Svenska (Swedish)
n. pl. - fonetik, ljudlära
中文（简体）(Chinese (Simplified))
语音学, 发音学
中文（繁體）(Chinese (Traditional))
n. pl. - 語音學, 發音學
n. - 語音學, 發音學
日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 音声学, 音組織, 音声体系
العربيه (Arabic)
(الجمع) علم الأصوات
עברית (Hebrew)
n. - חקר ההגאים ומיונם, פונטיקה
If you are unable to view some languages clearly, click here.
To select your translation preferences click here.
Learn More
 | Doon- |
| deena shee |
| ollav |
 | What is Lenience on phonetics? Read answer... |
| What is the antonym of phonetic? Read answer... |
| What is phonetic analysis? Read answer... |
Help us answer these
 | What is phonetic language? |
| Phonetics of lineage? |
| What is a phonetic analysis? |
Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:
Copyrights:
 |
 | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more |
 |
| Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
 |
| Dental Dictionary. Mosby's Dental Dictionary. Copyright © 2004 by Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
 |
| Literary Dictionary. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Copyright © Chris Baldick 2001, 2004. All rights reserved. Read more |
 |
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
|
| Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Read more |
 |
| Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/. Read more |
|
| World of the Mind. The Oxford Companion to the Mind. Second Edition. Copyright © Oxford University Press, 2004. All rights reserved. Read more |
 |
| Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Phonetics". Read more |
 |
| Translations. Copyright © 2007, WizCom Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. Read more |
Related answers
- What is phonetics?
- What are phonetics in english?
- Who was the creator of phonetics?
- Is Spanish phonetic?
- How do you sound phonetics?
ADVERTISEMENT
Answer these
- What is the opposite of phonetic?
- What is auditory phonetics?
- What are the functions of Phonetics?
- What is elision in phonetics?
Mentioned in
- IPA (abbreviation)
- slieve
- phonetize
- International Phonetic Alphabet (phonetic alphabet and diacritic modifiers)
- sheogue
- anaptotic
- phonetization
- phonetic alphabet
- Passy, Paul Édouard (French philologist)
- polyphone
