Because the founders recognized the natural right to weigh the consequences of individual action beforehand. Ex post facto laws, remove that right from the individual, as no one would be able to say for certain what the law would be tomorrow.
Retrospective laws are unfair because they change the legal status of the past. So if you do something that is not illegal on Monday, and the government decides to make it illegal on Tuesday, you can be punished legally.
Yes they are unconstitutional. See also Article 1 Section 9 of the constitution
It is unfair to the people who get in trouble for doing it before it was a law.
you just did =) this is unfair treatment. that game is unfair
Unfair tactics were used in the game. The judge was unfair in the eyes of the contestant. "That's unfair!" he exclaimed.
They prevent unfair or unequal treatment of many people or a person for their views. Also, they prevent segregation, which is one of the main reasons they exist.
not getting cotton candy was unfair
The retrospective or retroactive judgment is that one which also effects on the facts done before the time on which the judgment is issued while the prospective judgment only take effects after the time on which it's issued.
people should resist unfair laws (apex)
why did American think that the new laws from Great Britain were unfair.
The world is full of injustice and unfair laws.
He hoped to change unfair laws through peaceful protest. Some examples are marches, boycotts, and demonstrations.
Retrospective I was created in 1973.
no it is unfair to the people there are to many useless stupid laws that they have to follow
these laws are unfair
they thought the laws were unfair
Unfair taxes and laws.
that the wealthy were treated better then the poor
protection from unfair actions by the goverment
what is included when a retrospective relief occurs