The answer to it is "No Copyright" The Kama Sutra, as well as other Sutras, are not, of them-selves copyrighted and are public domain. This is because, basically, there is no ownership that has coyrighted them as they were written long ago. The same may be said of the art-work accompanying the Sutra. However, if a new author was to write a work that included the Sutra, he or she could copyright their work and any new illustrations created for their work.
Jack and the Beanstalk was originally collected as part of the Grimm Brothers stories. The stories are in the public domain, but are generally printed with copyrighted illustrations. They are distributed by many publishers.
The basic story is an ancient legend; since it was first written down before 1926, it is in the public domain in the US. So the basic idea cannot be copyrighted. However, you can copyright your rephrasing, or the illustrations that you create to accompany the story.
Yes, there are public domain illustrations from "The Wind In The Willows" by Kenneth Grahame. Many of the original illustrations by Paul Bransom are now in the public domain as they were published before 1923 and are free to use without copyright restrictions.
Unless specifically from public domain works, anything and everything on YouTube is copyrighted.
People aren't said to be either copyrighted or in the public domain.
If something is in the public domain, then it is not copyrighted. Creative commons also has a license for any software developer who wants to let others reuse their code.
No, it is in the public domain.
This music in in the public domain. Nothing from 1876 is still in copyright.
No it is not. It was copyrighted 1951. Any song with a copyright after 1922 is not in the public domain.
Her work would be copyrighted.
Both kinds of information appear on the web, although copyrighted content is more common.
Check the back of the card. In most cases it is going to be copyrighted. There is a chance that they are using something that is public domain.