That is a matter of taste. Grasses (the prime example) can be very attractive.
It is the flower not the plants being attractive in case of insect pollinated and not so attractive in case of wind pollinated.
Maybe
Yes.
No, shrubs are not wind pollinated therefore not a flowering plant. Most flowering plants are pollinated by insects, :D
Wheat is a grass and is wind pollinated.
grass is a prime example
Common examples of anemophilous (wind-pollinated) plants are ragweed, grass, and conifers.(Generally, any pollen that is considered an allergen, comes from an anemophilous plant)
They don't need to be. Color is one method used by insect pollinated plants to attract the insects. Wind pollinated plants such as Grasses and Pine trees don't need to attract pollinators. The male flowers simply release the pollen on to the breeze on a "hit or miss" basis.
Dahlias are pollinated by wind, insects or gardeners.
Wind-pollinated plants do not need colorful flowers as they are not pollinated by animals, insects or birds. Since wind-pollinated plants do not need colorful flowers, they might as well put their energy into making their pollen lighter, or more of it.
It's bright and showy, and even has little nectar ducts under its petals, so insect-pollinated. Wind-pollinated plants generally don't have flowers, or the flowers are very small and inconspicuous, like those of grass. Wind-pollinated plants also make far more pollen (try tapping a pine tree or reed in spring) because the wind does not take it directly to its destination, much of it will be lost. With insects there's a fair chance the little there is will reach another flower of the same species.
Grasses and grains are wind-pollinated, and plants are seed pollinated. There is a difference.
Grasses and grains are wind-pollinated, and plants are seed pollinated. There is a difference.