In an idealistic world, it would, and it would work perfectly.
However, in the real world, people have ambitions and will always find a way to gain power. And as soon as people attempt to take power from others, there will be fighting, and arguing, and the system breaks down.
NONe
resistance by the free world of an attmpt by communism to take over the people of South Korea
no they couldn`t take over the world but they could blow it up
With the exception of Chile, all communist leaders have used force of arms to take control of a country.
because it would mean that the soviets would take control over everything
you really never know it could be a natural disaster, governments take control
World War I ended with uprisings and revolutions in several European countries. Communists took advantage of these uprisings and tried to take control of those countries. They were successful in Russia, and also tried in Germany (where they did control parts like Bavaria briefly) and Hungary (where they took control for about five months).
With the exception of Chile, all communist leaders have used force of arms to take control of a country.
There goal was to take down Hitler and all communism
Capitalism is based on wage labour and production for sale. Communism has no economic system, as it has no money and so no buying and selling.
The people do, or everybody does (same thing).
the mouse was invented so computers wouldn't 'take over the world' so we could have control