yes
In America, the 4th Amendment says that evidence cannot be used if it has been illegally obtained, so no.
Any evidence that is part of court case is valid throughout the entire trial. There is no expiration on evidence even if it is a report from a level 2 security officer.
Unless otherwise prohibited
It depends on what it is being used as evidence of. The text contained in the letter would probably be hearsay, so it could not be introduced as evidence of anything contained in the letter. However, certified letters are often used to show that a party had notice of something. A copy of the certified letter could be admissible to show that the person received notice.
In the UK:Without prejudice - a term used by solicitors in negotiations over disputes where an offer is made in an attempt to avoid going to court. If the case does go to court no offer or facts stated to be without prejudice can be disclosed as evidence.
yes
Evidence of a crime can be used regardless of where it is recovered from.
Any legal evidence can be used in court. Most AA meetings, while held under the expectation of privacy and confidentiality, are not protected.
To start, much of the evidence must be backed up with factual evidence, so that the circumstancial evidence is minimal.
Syndrome evidence is the competence in theory of mind. Thsi is used in many court cases.
If an officer were to obtain evidence illegally, such as searching you without probable cause, the evidence they acquired would not be admissible in court. That's not to say the entire case would be thrown out, but that single piece of evidence would not be allowed in court. The exclusionary rule doesn't prevent unlawful searches and seizures, but it disincentivizes them by making evidence seized unlawfully inadmissible at trial. There's no reason to illegally obtain evidence if it can't be used to convict a defendant.
For one to use the computer law in court, all of the data or information must be collected legally (with a warrant or permission) before it can be used as evidence in a court of law. Any personal digital information from internet usage, emails and even credit cards can be included in this.
Tempering is messing with something that will be used in a court case. The term usually used is tampering with evidence which can make the evidence get tossed out of court.
Yes, if the evidence has already been ruled admissable in court, it can be used again. The more evidence that proves the point, the better.
In America, the 4th Amendment says that evidence cannot be used if it has been illegally obtained, so no.
Physical evidence can be used to corroborate (meaning to confirm) statements given by witnesses.
The exclusionary rule dictates that any evidence obtained with an improperly received search warrant or evidence obtained without any search warrant would be held inadmissible in a criminal trial.