First, the Probate of an estate is ruled by the laws of the state where the deceased legally lived at the time of death.
The execution [signing] of a form agreeing to allow your brother to act as Executor of the Estate does NOT ALLOW the Executor to keep anything he was not provided for IN the will.
The division of a deceased's assets MUST be done as was stated by the deceased IN THE WILL. However, the Executor is, by law, required to pay all obligations of the Estate, and therefore is allowed to sell assets of the Estate in order to pay those debts, but he is not allowed to take what he may want for himself.
Generally, when a person dies, the family retains an attorney to assist in the Probate process, and the FIRST THING YOU SHOULD DO is to contact him/her to make your concerns known.
IF your brother were to violate the legal duties of his office as Executor, you would not "contest" your father's will, but instead as a last resort, file suit against him personally for breaking the Probate law in failing to do his statutory duties. By virtue of violation of statutory law, he may be subject to prosecution by the local District Attorney.
Consult an attorney in your jurisdiction for the specific laws that will apply.
he is executing the will according to its contents, this has nothing to do with being fair, he is only doing what the will tells him to do. I you have a problem with the will then you must contest it through an attorney, who will advise you what to do.
The executor can file a resignation with the court and you would petition for appointment as the successor.
Nothing really. There is no blood relationship between the two.
No. If an Executor takes out a loan it has nothing to do with the estate he is executing.
Yes, nothing prohibits the executor from receiving part of the estate. In fact, it is more common than not for the executor to receive something, as for example, where a husband leaves his estate to his spouse and makes her his executor.
No one automatically becomes an executor. The executor must be appointed by the court. The first executor will need to be removed by the court and a successor must be appointed. However, the court will do nothing until a petition is filed requesting the changes.
You may contest the will on technical grounds if you believe it was improperly drafted according to state law. However, your aunt had the right to choose her own beneficiary.
In the UK: Yes. Provided they have nothing to gain from the Will.
I believe so because my brother was given in the state of IL in 1973. The father had nothing to do with it. My name is Melinda and I live in florida.
nothing
If you win in the contest hall you get a ribbon but nothing else except for that
The right to inherit has nothing to do with who was named executor. The right to inherit remains valid with all of the children. Consult a probate attorney that knows the laws for your state. ==Another Perspective== The court appointed executor has the obligation and authority to settle the estate. Only the executor has the power to manage the assets, transfer property, close accounts, sell real estate, etc. The executor must follow the provisions set forth in the will. However, all the powers of the office may be carried out according to the discretion of the executor without any interference by the beneficiaries. If the beneficiaries have questions concerning the executor's role they should first contact the attorney who is being paid to handle the estate.