answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

When you boil a certiorari down, it comes down to a writ. Or a degree of law in common terms. I have dusted off my lexicon as well as used search engines to scour for not only the meaning of your words but for the US Supreme Court Rules of Procedure. You might have your legal terms mixed up a little bit or not phrased properly.

"postponing jurisdiction, or granting a petition for a writ of certiorari." From the Oct 2013 Guide for Counsel for the US Supreme Court. Which is the active version the last time I checked. But I heard there is going to be a new version 1 July 2014. Just a footnote, I am NO lawyer.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can opposing certiorari in ussupreme court re-write the petioner question?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

An appellate court will not hear an appeal if certiorari has been granted?

The US Supreme Court is an appellate court under most circumstances. If it grants certiorari, it will hear the case.This question only makes sense if you're trying to determine whether an intermediate appellate court will hear a case from a trial court if the case has been accepted on direct, or expedited, appeal to the Supreme Court. The answer to that question is no. Cases granted certiorari on direct appeal bypass the intermediate appellate court.


What is a persuasive essay opposing viewpoint?

the opposing viewpoint in a persuasive essay is a paragraph opposing to your main argument, so that the reader will have considered another point of view and have a rebuttal to it. hope this answers your question!


In which part of a debate does one team question the opposing team?

Cross-Examination


Which part of a debate does one team question the opposing team?

Cross-examination


What should you do if you you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What should you do if you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What does it mean by opposing position?

This means to have an opinion that is not the same that someone else has. You are on this side, he is on that side of the question.


What does it means for a research question to be debatable?

If a research question is debatable, this means there are at least two opposing viewpoints on the subject. The question is something for which a single, factual argument can not be made.


Can you subpoena the opposing party for evidence in small claims?

This question is not clear, kindly check it and ask again.


Candidates of opposing parties run against each other for particular office?

The question describes the election process.


When a runner steals second makes contact with bag then told by opposing player it was foul when it was not and he runs back to first and is thrown out?

The runner is out. If there is any question, the player should ask the umpire or his coach, not an opposing player.


What can I do as pro se that opposing counsel will not provide information for a public auction on my property?

From the question it sounds as if opposing counsel might have already received a court order to hold the auction. If so, I don't what you can do at this point, but try going to the court and filing a motion to block the sale or requesting disclosure from opposing counsel.