When you boil a certiorari down, it comes down to a writ. Or a degree of law in common terms. I have dusted off my lexicon as well as used search engines to scour for not only the meaning of your words but for the US Supreme Court Rules of Procedure. You might have your legal terms mixed up a little bit or not phrased properly.
"postponing jurisdiction, or granting a petition for a writ of certiorari." From the Oct 2013 Guide for Counsel for the US Supreme Court. Which is the active version the last time I checked. But I heard there is going to be a new version 1 July 2014. Just a footnote, I am NO lawyer.
The US Supreme Court is an appellate court under most circumstances. If it grants certiorari, it will hear the case.This question only makes sense if you're trying to determine whether an intermediate appellate court will hear a case from a trial court if the case has been accepted on direct, or expedited, appeal to the Supreme Court. The answer to that question is no. Cases granted certiorari on direct appeal bypass the intermediate appellate court.
the opposing viewpoint in a persuasive essay is a paragraph opposing to your main argument, so that the reader will have considered another point of view and have a rebuttal to it. hope this answers your question!
Cross-Examination
Cross-examination
If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.
If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.
This means to have an opinion that is not the same that someone else has. You are on this side, he is on that side of the question.
If a research question is debatable, this means there are at least two opposing viewpoints on the subject. The question is something for which a single, factual argument can not be made.
This question is not clear, kindly check it and ask again.
The question describes the election process.
The runner is out. If there is any question, the player should ask the umpire or his coach, not an opposing player.
From the question it sounds as if opposing counsel might have already received a court order to hold the auction. If so, I don't what you can do at this point, but try going to the court and filing a motion to block the sale or requesting disclosure from opposing counsel.