Both relied on overall control with local governments continuing to rule under their supervision.
Each continued local government with provincial governors.
To ensure that local governments were not sympathetic to independence movements, they deported the indigenous ruling classes and replaced them with imported ruling classes from other provinces. This occurred, eg, in the kingdom of Israel where an Assyrian aristocracy was imported to rule and the Israel aristocracy sent to Assyria to rule there.
The same was done later with Judah, where the Babylonian Empire exported its aristocracy to rule in a province of Babylon, and a new aristocracy imported to rule in Judah. The Persians did similar exchanges. It was a clever common trick to give restive peoples hostile rulers who would keep them quiet, without having to have extensive Assyrian/Babylonian/Persian garrisons struggling to contain endless insurgency.
By being super rich, and trying thwere best to succeed in life?
Both relied on overall control with local governments continuing to rule under their supervision.
none of your beezwax
nothing
The Assyrian
The Assyrian Empire. Persia later took it over.
Assyrian, Babylonian.
The Assyrian, Babylonian and Hellenic.
Succesively, the Assyrian Empire, the Babylonian Empire, the Persian Empire and the Macedonian empire of Alexander the Great.
Assyrian, Babylonian and part of the Greek world.
Assyrian Empire.
No, the Persian Empire was far mor extensive, reaching from Libya to Central Asia.
Best is Herodotos The Histories.
The Assyrian empire was assimilated by Babylonia, which was in turn conquered and assimilated by the Persian empire.
First the Assyrian, then copied by the Babylonian, then the Persian.
The ruling empire at the time - Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Macedonian, Roman.