Workable--yes. There have been many systems of government around the world that did not have judicial review.
Fair--no. Without judicial review, someone in another branch of government gets to be the final arbiter of disputes about the meanings of laws. And those people are usually the ones who also have the guns
Judicial review... which was given binding authority by Maybury v Madison in 1803
Judicial review is an implied power of the Judicial Branch in the US government, but an established practice in common law.
Judicial review
the judicial review allow the government to adapt to the changes in the us by with higher authority such as the terms of the written constitution and the treaty
It prevents the government from enforcing laws that violate the Constitution.
That power is the power of judicial review.
Judicial review... which was given binding authority by Maybury v Madison in 1803
Judicial review is an implied power of the Judicial Branch in the US government, but an established practice in common law.
Judicial review
the judicial review allow the government to adapt to the changes in the us by with higher authority such as the terms of the written constitution and the treaty
judicial Review
People support the judicial review system because ideally, it can balance and check the executive and legislative branches of government.
yes assessment is a synonym for judicial review considering it definition: Power of a court to adjudicate The constitutionality of laws Of a government
The Judicial Branch has the power of Judicial Review. They have the ability to review decisions made by the other two branches of government, and they have to measures to allow or prevent them from occurring.
It prevents the government from enforcing laws that violate the Constitution.
judicial review
the main importance of judicial review are: to protect individuals rights,to balance government powers and to create and maintain equality to every persons/people