Did people who own and run the Federal Reserve System fund the events of 911?

Answer 1

A real person quoting a Rockefeller admitting that 911 is a part of a plan. Google Rockefeller 911 or see below. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCjg_k2cifE While this topic is considered by some to be unpatriotic, I will step up to the plate. Before I proceed, I would like to give a shout out to the Department of Homeland Security, who is probably reading this as I type.

This question cannot be answered without personal opinion. If one adheres to the 9/11 Commission Report, the answer ends at "no, they were not involved". However, one must explore all options of an answer to decipher the truth. The interpretation of facts can be skewed in many directions. It is up to the asker to interpret the facts for themselves, and arrive at their own answer. So, without an further adieu, here is my answer.

We first start with the theory, whether true or not, that the men behind the international banking cartels (i.e. The Fed, The European Central bank, etc.) are using their control of the money supply to influence governments and organizations to make and carry out policies and plans which favor the banks and their leaders. A little perspective on this issue: The Federal Reserve Bank was created by The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 signed into Law by President Woodrow Wilson. In is known fact that the Federal Reserve Act was drafted by banking pioneers, not politicians. Paul Warburg, J.D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, and a handful of powerful, rich men were responsible for the drafting of the bill. Woodrow Wilson agreed to sign the bill into law for campaign support from the banking industry. Wilson later wrote: "We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world-no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men." Wilson, The New Freedom

Here are some quotes of the men behind the banking cartels, which implicitly implies their ultimate plans:

"The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it's profits or so dependent on it's favors, that there will be no opposition from that class" ~ Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863

"While boasting of our noble deeds we're careful to conceal the ugly fact that by an iniquitous money system we have nationalized a system of oppression which, though more refined, is not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery" ~ Horace Greeley

So to continue, these men control many facets of our society. The majority of the media, the manufacturing industry, major defense contractors, and don't forget the banking system. One of the most profitable situations for these men is war. (Note: After 1913, we have engaged in four major wars and numerous minor conflicts) War causes the government to need money. Money is what the Fed makes. So, the Fed loans the money to the government (yes, a loan, that means it has interest attached to it). Which in turn is partly used to pay defense contractors and the military manufacturers to supply our troops and "rebuild" the country we have invaded. So in essence, the Fed gives the government money so the government can pay the companies owned by the men who run the Fed. (Another note: The 35% or so that the average taxpayer pays in income tax each year goes to the Fed to pay the interest on the loan given to the government, a.k.a. national debt)

Further down the rabbit hole.....

So these men welcome war for the large profits to be gained. In relation to your question, the men are smart and powerful. If they have any involvement with 9/11, it is not direct. It's very similar to the six degrees of separation. If they are involved, you will have to make your way through a dizzying list of people to make a connection. It is known that the Bush Administration had a preemptive Iraqi war strategy before 9/11. Some speculate that this strategy was created at the interests of these men though, once again, not directly. Americans are not the type of people who want to go and attack/invade other countries for no reason. Somehow, they had to convince Americans that we need to go to war. So the Bush administration and the "powers that be" needed an impetus for war. That brings us to your question. I ask you: Could one feasibly think that these men, including our President, would foster such a plot to drive us to war? The answer can be argued strongly both ways. However, in my opinion, one answer has more truth and reasoning to it.

I ascribe to the answer that these men are responsible in many ways. They have an agenda to rule the world. They want to control every aspect of human life. With President Bush as their front man, they are succeeding greatly. Because of this "War on Terror", Americans have lost many of their civil liberties. The government, which is indebted to the Fed, has expanded its authority and rule over it's own citizens. The Constitution is slowly becoming null and void. Notice I said slowly, nothing in this plan is designed to move swiftly (just look at the war). These changes are implemented piece by piece, each one strengthening the next. Americans have been brainwashed and subdued by the media. Also, the media doesn't realize that they are a Propaganda machine for these men. Through these controlled media outlets and the consumer life style, we have stopped paying attention to the world around us. The word "terrorist" has become a mirage for the retraction of our rights. Slap the word on a bill, and we will pass it into law without blinking. We are so caught up in our lives that we let it happen without any opposition. Eventually, we will have no rights and will be subject to government rule in all aspects of life. (Once again, our government is controlled by the Fed. So if we are puppets of the government, and the government is the puppet of the Fed, we too are puppets of the Fed. They will control us, just as planned.)

Flashback to the 1993 WTC bombing. It is known that the government helped the terrorists fund and carry out the attack. The government even helped build the bomb. However, the attack did not cause "significant" amounts of human causalities. Therefore, there was not enough of an impetus to pass these laws which take away our rights. In 1995, we had the OKC bombing. Many people died, and this caused "anti-terror" bills to be passed into laws. So, if you want to start a war with Another Country, you need to create an event that is so great, the American people become convinced the war is in their interest. Hence 9/11, and the resulting war. (Note: One may cite that the 9/11 Commission gave an answer to the attack and who was responsible. Notice that the funding of the attacks "was of little significance" according to the report. I want you to know that the head of the commission was the guy who wrote the preemptive war strategy) If one truly looks at the facts, and looks past what you have been told, the truth will be evident.

Once again, this is my opinion. I don't believe a direct line of responsibility for 9/11 can be drawn to these men. However, I feel they pulled many strings to create the world we live in today. Every time you hear about Congress passing another military spending bill which is in the billions of dollars, remember who is benefiting the most from it.

Very interesting phenomenon here - You make one post and get 16 trust recommendations. I've been censored here and gave great reservations about this community , but there are those who are willing to think outside the box too. That's a good thing.