No, because they had too much stuff going on in their lives like getting really dirty, not having a nice home, and things like that.
Poor victorians would mainly live on the streets and would not have much money
rich victorians had a tub of water to wash in but poor victorians licked themselves
they would play hopskotch and skipping but poor children sometimes got sent to the workhouse
Coach and horses I think..Hope I helped,Sallypoodle x
actually in fact yes they did but of course they were poor so they could not afford to help one another
No the poor Victorians have no money but the rich one did have lots of money poor Victorians had to work and rich Victorians had poor one to work for them
no not really. they couldnt afford any presents!
Poor victorians would mainly live on the streets and would not have much money
rich victorians had a tub of water to wash in but poor victorians licked themselves
Rich Victorians were usually the healthiest. Poor victorians weren't healthy at all
Not Sure
good quality
good quality
They had to work for about 13 hours a day and the started work when the were about 5/4
a good defnition is that the person might be rich/poor or maybe they are te center of the familey but a good life definition is that the have wht they want......
No, just poor quality, but good price.
The quality of life depended on whether you were rich or poor. If you were rich you could have a good and easy life. But if you were poor you could have a rough and hard life, often ending up in the workhouse or early death.