Whilst this is a matter of opinion, most law-abiding Australian citizens would say that anti-terrorism laws do not infringe on individual human rights. They would rather be safe and endure minor inconveniences than be allowed freedoms that also mean terrorists can easily get through minimal security measures.
These new rules infringe on my rights.
My lawyer made sure noone can infringe upon my rights.
The police officer began to infringe upon my rights when he arrested me without reading me them. The definition of infringe is to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another.
State's Rights. :)
the n
yes protecting health information
The fallacy is that smoker's rights are ignored
They infringe upon the rights of some groups
Libertarians believe you can't infringe on someone's rights. Therefore libertarians support it.
life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (however these "rights" are limited so as to not infringe upon others rights. For example, your right of liberty, essentially freedom cannot infringe upon another persons right to live.)
c. as long as that person does not infringe on the rights of others
The Bill of Rights is limited at the point where a single person's rights begin to infringe on another person's rights. At this point, the infringing person is not protected by the Bill of Rights.