No we do not need to, we just want to. Cloning technology holds the key to solving a lot of the world's problems that might not otherwise be fixable. If you want a cure in the near future for lots of diseases like Parkinsons, cancer, etc, then yes we really need to study cloning.
genetransferring is an engineering process where as cloning does not need genetical engineering whole
No, not really since it is just for cloning. But their should be enough promoter/sequence to provide antibiotic resistance.
Many people believe that human cloning is wrong because every human was made as an individual, certain religious groups believe that god planned each of us individually. But others believe that cloning could really help the world, maybe not in humans but as the population of humans grows, we will need more animals to produce food.
When you want to clone something you put it into the cloning machine and BAM its cloned!!!
cloning is a very bad thing. in most cloning abilities one of the side effects is that the clone turns bad, half the world is after you and not to mention the clones will be verypowerful.To be very honest, I am against it, but if it is going to help world poverty, by for instance cloning really good food sources, or helping eradicate terrible diseases, then I am all for it
A good Christians view on cloning is no. No cloning.
In general, sticky end cloning and blunt end cloning
therapeutic cloning
The advantage of cloning is replacing or to clone organs for a specific need although it is illegal to clone an entire human body. The disadvantage is that cloning humans would be able to create custom built people by combining the possibilities in cloning and genetic engineering. The entire body will be the same and also it will effect population too.
Embryo cloning is when you go through the process of cloning an original embryo
Ian Wilmut did not call cloning cloning. He was the professor that had cloned Dolly (Andrew) the sheep. Johnny