Greek culture.
Pachacuti
The expansion of Spanish Empire led to Latin American wars of independence from Spain. It made territory much larger.
There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.
They were so important because it led to the destruction of the Persian Empire.
the empires and dynasties of China, Byzantine, and Abbasid were able to establish a strong trade network that led to the spread and emergence of religions that contributed to the expansion of religions and contact between existing empires
As you may know the Roman Empire became very powerful across the world and spread through parts of Europe, Asia, and Africa. They were very powerful but they didn't have strong leaders that how it led to the fall of the Western Roman Empire.
It put an end to Persian expansion to the west and led to the contest for power in the Greek world between Athens and its empire and the Spartan-led Peloponnesian League.
The spread of migration of small farmers into cities caused unemployment which led to the decline of the empire.
The birth of Jesus, the beginning of John the Baptist's ministry, Jesus' ministry,and the crucifixion of Jesus, all eventually led to the spread of Christianity. Christianity spread rapidly once it was made the official religion of the Roman Empire in the year, 380.
It led to the expansion of Hellenistic culture.
The two words are not mutually opposite. The Roman republic had an empire for a couple of hundred years. The empire continued on under a single ruler for the next few hundred years. Empire is a modern word. The words empire and emperor did not exist at the time.
Montesquieu postulated that Rome's military might outweighed its dedication to civic responsibility and the costs of expansion undermined the Empire.