There is more than one part of a sentence that can answer those questions.
The subject is who or what the sentence is about. It acts, is acted upon, or is described.
An "object" noun in a sentence can be the recipient of an action. A direct object receives the action (what or whom), while an indirect object is one to whomor for whom the action is done.
Using exaggeration can captivate the reader's attention, emphasize a point, or create a humorous effect. It can also help to add emphasis, make a statement more memorable, or create a vivid image in the reader's mind.
4,502,587 in word would be as four million, five hundred two thousand, five hundred and eighty-seven.
The Law of Conservation of Mass means that chemical reaction equations must be balanced, otherwise you have lost or gained matter out of nowhere.
I would use the word "affected" rather than "effected" in that sentence. The word "affected" would be an adjective in that sentence. The word "effected" is used as a verb. The following sentence would make sense:
The affected parts effected a situation that caused our problem.
Of course, if "effected" is the correct word, it would bring about a different meaning of the sentence.
The effected parts caused the problem that affected our car's engine.
That implies that the parts had been acted upon by an external source. These words are difficult to keep straight.
However, do not trust me! I highly recommend that you use a dictionary for this. I think I remember that "affect" sometimes can be a verb. The sentence I used: "The effected parts caused the problem that affected our car's engine." I believe in that sentence "affected" is used as a verb, and "effected" is used as an adjective. Please, use the dictionary. I recommend Webster's Dictionary; I believe they update annually.
Maize is an arable crop, that is fed to hogs, and human also eat it as 'corn on the cobb'.
You've got to have faith in God and faith in yourself.
The phrase "dashed off" suggests that Mark quickly wrote or composed something without spending much time or effort on it.
Kafka uses the literary technique of metaphor in this sentence.
No, "glossy caramel fleece" is not an example of an oxymoron. An oxymoron is a combination of contradictory terms, like "jumbo shrimp" or "deafening silence." In this case, "glossy caramel fleece" is just a description of something that combines different qualities (shiny, caramel-colored, and soft).
Bilk means to cheat or defraud someone. For example, "The con artist tried to bilk unsuspecting victims out of their money with a fraudulent investment scheme."
"A motif of darkness and light is present throughout the novel, symbolizing the characters' inner struggles." "The motif of the clock ticking in the background serves as a reminder of the protagonist's impending deadline." "Water is a recurring motif in the story, representing both cleansing and danger."
One example of a sentence in literary nonfiction could be: "The sun peeked through the clouds, casting a warm glow on the meadow below as I wandered through the field, feeling the grass brush against my legs."
In George Orwell's book "1984," the Party did not like people using the word "freedom" because it represented a concept that went against their totalitarian control over society. The Party aimed to eliminate any notions of individuality and independence, and thus sought to suppress ideas related to freedom.
The construction project featured a massive behemoth of a crane that towered over the site.
The sentence you propose is a correct use of notwithstanding.Lady Macbeth, notwithstanding her role as a woman, was a powerful character.
The word notwithstanding presents an opposition or primary difference to your main comment. It would be the same as writing:
Even though Lady Macbeth was a woman, she was a powerful character.
The word "notwithstanding" eliminates some wordiness when used correctly.