The outcome of a hypothetical battle between the USS Enterprise and the Yamato is highly subjective and depends on numerous factors such as crew skills, tactical maneuvers, and technological advancements. Both vessels were formidable in their respective universes, with the Enterprise being from Star Trek and the Yamato from Space Battleship Yamato. It is best to enjoy the strengths and stories of each spaceship in their own context rather than trying to determine a winner.

This is a tough question, but lets size these fierce rivals up... Who would win? Triceratops Tyrannosaurus Rex size: 30 feet long 40 feet long wieght: 10 000- 15 000 lb 13 000 lb weapons: Protective frill, 3 horns 4 foot long jaws, 52 8 inch long teeth I.Q.: Low Rather smart lived: 70-65 mya 67-65 mya So... Who would come ontop in a battle to the Death? This is a Classic battle. If Triceratops jabed all its horns into the tyrant, it could cause a fatal wound and end the batte quickly. But if Tyrannosarus cruched down on the back or ribs of its rival, the horned dinosaur wouldn't stand a chance. so in this cash of the titans, they are simply too even matched to tell the outcome.

the tuna would win easily because the stingrays would be 2 tired from wresling and killing the legendary Steve Irwin. may god bless Stevie

The hippo would definitely win this fight because a hippo has a larger body with thick skin and a huge jaw that can crush the black bear to death. One hippo can even kill a polar bear without getting injured.

leopards are faster running, if that's what you mean.

The lion. All a gorilla can do is throw stuff at the lion, but a lion will full-on attack and kill a gorilla with ease.

There is no general answer. Every encounter is unique. In some cases the dog wins. In others, the dog will die due to a venomous bite; or he becomes the snake's next meal.

Dogs and cats regularly kill snakes, but some face larger or more dangerous reptiles than they can handle.

The cobras generally have a much more potent venom than rattlesnakes. However, there are other snakes, such as the saw-scaled viper and Russell's viper, which are even deadlier. Sea snakes are even more potent but are rare to bite.

sandman

the black mamba because of its venom

The leopard can stand a chance against the crocodile due to the speed, but the crocodile has very tough skin that the leopard cannot bite through. The crocodile will grab the leopard with its jaws and crunch it to death.

A stoat would win it easily, it is almost twice as heavy!

Most likely Frankenstein because he's much stronger.

--Improved--

I think that Dracula would win against Frankenstein because he would just have to bite Frankenstein to restore his health. It's like he has a built in healing spell for himself.

• A badger would win , because there strength is stronger than three squirrels that can run really fast.

Yes. They have strong heads and thick bodies with a lot of muscles and strength that can easily knock down the polar bear by charging. The musk ox can also gore the polar bear too death, or knocking the polar bear with its head.

Both cats are close in weight. Smilodon has the huge, nine inch killing canines. But the tiger is faster on his feet, and and is just as powerful. If smilodon does not get a clean bite with his canines, the tiger most likely will win.

Both are good dogs. The English Bull is slightly larger. Both are loyal and when trained correctly make wonderful family pets.

A elephant would kill the grizzly bear because it can stab the grizzly bear with those tusks.
that may be true but also the grizzly bear is moreaggressive and if the elephant gets scared all it can do is charge forward or run away

The fisher would probably win such a battle.

The simple answer is we can't know at all. Largely of what we know about Dinosaurs is speculative, because we have to make a lot of speculations about them. Spinosaurus in particular is only known from few fossils, with large rages is size estimates ranging from 41 to 59 ft in length and 7.7 to 23.0 tons in weight . Spinosaurus would of been bigger and therefore stronger as well as having some nasty claws, T-Rex had a much meaner bite backing it up.

Now T-Rex fans will flip out over the Jurassic park 3 fight, where they will argue the T-rex was a juvenile, but will leave out the Spinosaurus was also smaller the what is currently estimated to be as well.

Some will argue the Spinosarus only ate fish, and while is undoubtedly did eat fish it is also incredibly likely it ate other dinosaurs. It is also believed that Spinosarus would switch between fish and meat, competing with both large Crocodilian and other Theropods, like Carcharodontosaurus, who was also bigger than T-Rex.

So untimely we really can't known, and people will argue for both sides and both will site facts, be really we don't know.

While kestrels share some similarities with other relatives of the raptor group, they are in fact members of the Falcon Family (Falconidae), not the Hawk Family (Accipitridae). Their simalarity to the Eurasian Kestrel is the source of the name "Kestrel."

a tiger would win

It depends entirely upon what's being referred to as a Leviathan.

The bible refers to it as a sea monster, whilst not truely defining it (Wikipedia doesn't in the first section)

Whilst It's often called a whale in other sections.

Whilst in others it's referred to as a snake/serpent or sorts.

Compare this to a Megaladon which is 15.9-20.3 metres long, and I'd say the details will make the difference.

Megaladon would beat the whale, but perhaps not the traditional monster it's often thought of as being.

It depeneds enitrely on where the fight was to occur. If the fight was in water, then the alligator would probably win. On land, the bear would destroy the alligator. Overall though, the bear would win.

Gaur, bears won't mess with an adult bovid.