They both agreed with a central power to negotiate between the various States, and both agreed with the people being directly involved and benefiting from, a central government.
The Federalists, like George Washington, wanted a highly powerful central government . . . after all, that was how England was governed, and there were still extremely close ties between the US and England.
They are both capitalist parties; they usually agree on foreign policy; they both support Imperialism, the elected political leaders are usually very wealthy people, don't seem to understand that we need a single payer national health system in the United States, and support military buildups.
They were both American political parties and both were a force in 1796 and 1800. They both wanted the United States to prosper and be strong. Other than that, they had no more in common that do the Democrats and Republicans today and perhaps they were even more divided geographically.
they both poo
they are because they both agree on Independence
There are hundreds of different political parties. The two major parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, who are more alike that either wish to admit. There are several "third" parties, ony one of which has any seats in the House, and none of which has much of a chance of getting even one more congressional seat. (The one is Socialist Bernie Sanders. ) Of the potential third parties which may occasionally play a spoiler role in politics they are, in no particular order, the Libertarians, the Greens, the Peace and Freedom, the Conservatives, the Communists, the Socialists, the Constitutional Party, the Farmer/Laborer party (in Minnesota, they ARE the "Democrats") and the Progressive Party. Beyond this are many dozens of splinter parties which will rarely work together long enough to mount a credible challenger to any major party candidate.
The two major parties are alike because they have to represent some plurality of the American people in order to become major. If they were opposite ends of the spectrum, they would not gain the popularity they have today.
festival
The only similarity I see is that both parties are comprised of humans.
no
The following website has some great Halloween Party ideas for old and young alike: http://www.halloweenpartyideas.org/ Here, you will find ideas for food, music, costumes, games and more. Another great site to check out for fun family Halloween party ideas is Disney Family Fun, at: http://familyfun.go.com/halloween/halloween-parties/
Although they had different views on the power of central government, they had the greater good of the country in mind.
One answer:While some Republicans like to advance this assertion, the sad truth is that both political parties had members who were involved in the growth of the Klan, and the KKK was soon embraced by influential Republicans and Democrats alike. It is certainly true that many of the original members, including its first leader, Nathan Bedford Forrest, were southern Democrats who were affiliated with the Confederacy and upset that the south had lost the Civil War. But it is also true that some members, even in those early years, were white Republicans who objected to blacks having civil rights. And during the Klan's resurgence in the early 1900s, some of its most devoted members came from both parties; Republicans and Democrats alike joined because they held either anti-black, anti-Jewish, anti-immigrant, or anti-Catholic views; the KKK was thus able to spread out of the south and through the mid-west (and even into some parts of the north).Another answer:Definitely not. The KKK has never been tied to any political party, but is today described as a "far right" group (which would tie it to a certain wing of the Republican Party). However, the KKK has, from its beginning, been a racist group with no significant goals beyond extreme endorsement for a particular class of people. It is officially recognized as a "hate group".
a cylinder is like a soup can. and a cone is like a party hat.