He didn't change the nature of the war from the American angle. The Proclamation was really for the ears of Britain and France, who could no longer send military aid to the Confederacy without looking pro-slavery themselves.
It changed the war by giving southern slaves hope. While obviously the Union could not immediately enforce the proclamation (it only freed slaves in the rebellious states, not those states which were still in the Union), it did mean that any slaves captured by Union troops were immediately freed instead of being held as "captured enemy property" as they had been up to that point. It also encouraged slaves to attempt to escape, which damaged the Confederacy's economy and production.
It didn't.
The Proclamation was an urgent tactical measure, aimed at making it ethically impossible for Britain and France to support the Confederacy. In this, it was totally successful.
As a secondary aim, Lincoln had hoped that it would change the character of the war, by turning it into a crusade against slavery, to give the war-weary North something more emotive to fight for. But this did not happen, and the average Union soldier was never especially interested in the slavery issue.
Northern civilian morale remained low (and Lincoln at risk of being voted out) until some timely victories in Autumn '64 saved his bacon.
on september 22, 1862 encouraged by the union victory at antietam, lincoln publicly announced that he would issue the emancipation proclamtion to free the slaves
Abraham Lincoln
yu ddnt tell me what i wanted to knw
He abandoned the secretive nature of the union
The English Bill of Rights affected the nature of the English government by making the monarchy conditional and by limiting tits power.
It set the tone. It was going to a hard, fast and total war.
With the Emancipation Proclamation, the Union seized and held the high moral ground for the rest of the war.
The answer the question is probably looking for is "the Emancipation Proclamation", which kept Britain and France (both of which were anti-slavery, but also more or less anti-Union) from officially recognizing and possibly supporting the Confederacy.
The answer the question is probably looking for is "the Emancipation Proclamation", which kept Britain and France (both of which were anti-slavery, but also more or less anti-Union) from officially recognizing and possibly supporting the Confederacy.
The answer the question is probably looking for is "the Emancipation Proclamation", which kept Britain and France (both of which were anti-slavery, but also more or less anti-Union) from officially recognizing and possibly supporting the Confederacy.
The answer the question is probably looking for is "the Emancipation Proclamation", which kept Britain and France (both of which were anti-slavery, but also more or less anti-Union) from officially recognizing and possibly supporting the Confederacy.
The answer the question is probably looking for is "the Emancipation Proclamation", which kept Britain and France (both of which were anti-slavery, but also more or less anti-Union) from officially recognizing and possibly supporting the Confederacy.
Lincoln had been worried about British plans to send aid to the Confederacy, and wanted to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, to make it impossible for free nations abroad to aid the South without looking pro-slavery themselves. His cabinet pointe dout that this would look like a desperate measure, while the Confederates appeared to be winning in the summer of 1862. He would have to wait for a Union win. This unexpectedly came at Antietam in September of that year, after which Lincoln issued his Proclamation and the British were never interested in intervention after that.
Making Grant the commander of the army.
Need a noun to answer this question please rewrite.
Making Grant the commander of the army.
Making Grant the commander of the army.
Making Grant the commander of the army.