The POWs that were posted to build the Burma railway endured unimaginable conditions. Starvation was common and many troops died from malnutrition and disease. No medical facilities were available for the soldiers, resulting in thousands of deaths on the railway. The scars which the POWs received would stay with them both physically and mentally forever. They should be treated with the utmost respect and admiration for what they went through. They were lucky to get out at all.
I notice that neither of the above answers talks about the brutal way in which the Japanese guards treated the Allied POW's. Beatings were common, and many prisoners were killed by being kicked to death, or by being be-headed with a sword. No limits were placed on the punishment, by the Japanese officers, who considered the POWS to be "unworthy " of respect because they had "surrendered " instead of fighting and dying.
A Allied POW held by the Japanese was 9 times more likely to DIE, than if he was a German prisoner of war.
Most died from disease, injuries and malnutrition; the greatest number died on the Thai-Burma railway and its aftermath.
yes, especially Soviet pows
Stalag Luft 3.
See: Wikipedia World War II Casualties.
In World War 2 the varies armies took prisoners of war (POWs) when fighting their enemies and put them in POW camps. POWs in Germany in World War 2 included men from the Allied armed forces.
Most died from disease, injuries and malnutrition; the greatest number died on the Thai-Burma railway and its aftermath.
POW = prisoner of war. they were prisoners and as such didn't really have a leader. there were POWs on both sides
Because they surrendered.
Almost all of them.
yes
What was the Pows?
world war 1
3 minutes
everything they are war heroes
5%
See website: WW2 Casualties
yes, especially Soviet pows