The Plaintiffs in Worcester were Samuel A. Worcester, Elizur Butler, and nine other missionaries affiliated with the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM), who were arrested in Gwinnett County, Georgia, on charges of living on Cherokee land without holding the requisite state permit. The Cherokee Nation hired lawyers (names not located) to represent the men in court because they actively assisted the Nation in resisting Georgia's attempts to relocate the Cherokee.
Case Citation:
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The case of Worcester started because Worcester and other missionaries who were teaching Native Americans to read and write were living on Cherokee land without purchasing a Georgia state permit allowing them to reside there.
Case Citation:
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)
Samuel Worcester .
well.....my dick
Court ruled that Georgia was not entitled to regulate the Cherokee nor to invade their lands.
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)For more information on Worcester v. Georgia, see Related Questions, below.
Yes, the case was heard under the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction. Worcester v. Georgia, (1832) was appealed on a writ of error from the Superior Court for the County of Gwinett in the State of Georgia.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)
Grand Jury
The Cherokees', for the first time got what they wanted.
The I hate naggers case
That the state of Georgia did not have the authority to regulate relations between citizens of its state and members of the Cherokee Nation.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)
That the state of Georgia did not have the authority to regulate relations between citizens of its state and members of the Cherokee Nation.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)
In the court case Worcester v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court held in 1832 that the Cherokee Indians constituted a nation holding distinct sovereign powers. Although the decision became the foundation of the principle of tribal sovereignty in the twentieth century, it did not protect the Cherokees from being removed from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast.
That the state of Georgia did not have the authority to regulate relations between citizens of its state and members of the Cherokee Nation.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)