Workers protested against harsh working conditions. This led to the formation of unions in order to protect the rights of the worker.
Socialists responded to new and harsh working conditions by pushing for laws that would regulate them. They sought a minimum wage and an eight-hour workday.
a growth of socialist movements.
Working conditions during the Civil War were harsh. People worked long hours and were paid very low wages. There were strikes during this time by workers to improve the working conditions.
The harsh working conditions for British factory workers in the 19th century include long working hours, for as long as 16 hours a day, and physical punishment to make workers speed up production. Since machines were not designed for safety, many fatal accidents resulted.
The social criticism in Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" was a response to the harsh working conditions faced by immigrant workers in the meatpacking industry in Chicago. Sinclair exposed the unsafe working conditions, exploitation, and unsanitary practices that workers endured.
The conditions were harsh and nasty
well........
The working conditions at Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company were often harsh and dangerous. Employees faced long hours, low pay, and little job security. Safety standards were often ignored, leading to frequent accidents and injuries. Workers had limited rights and faced harsh disciplinary measures for speaking out or organizing for better conditions.
they were formed by workers to improve their working conditions. just as business leaders met to improve business
In the book "Lyddie," the working conditions in the textile mills are depicted as harsh and unsafe. Workers, including children, were often overworked, underpaid, and subjected to long hours in noisy and dangerous environments. The mills were poorly ventilated, leading to health issues such as lung problems.
Sarah Bagley urged textile mill co-workers to form a union. She and others met one day after work to discuss the harsh working conditions and the long hours in 1844, Lowell, Massachusetts.
The statement makes assumptions which are not necessarily correct. An employer may expect greater output but there are laws limiting harsh work conditions