Historically, Myanmar has been under military rule since 1962. It is a Dictatorship in which no one has the right to vote and they have a very miserably life . In the 1970s, the military government brutally suppressed student protests at leading Burmese Academic Institutions. In the late 1980s, there was increasing pressure from the Burmese people for more democratic reforms. In May of 1990, there was a free and fair election that led to the NLD (National League for Democracy) winning 80% of the vote and the parliament seats. However, the military government refused to accept the results, imprisoned the NLD leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, in her own home, and strengthened their grip on power. This effectively served as a refusal of the people's demands.
Starting in 2007, the situation began to change. In 2007, monks protested the actions of the government in what became known as the Saffron Revolution. Although the Myanmar government violently repressed the incident, it had wide international coverage and served to further isolate Myanmar. In 2008, there was a constitutional referendum to push the country closer to democracy and in 2012, the NLD won 43 out of 45 vacant seats in the Burmese Parliament. It is unclear why the Myanmar government is taking this pro-democracy stance, but NLD leaders like Aung San Suu Kyi are using it as best they can to influence policy. Ms. Suu Kyi is currently the Leader of the Opposition in the Lower House of the Myanmar Parliament and no longer under house arrest.
n
if the rulers are good and have the thought to help people then they will try or rulers will complete their right wishes and if rulers are bad they will not complete people wishes or they will complete by taking bribe from people
By killing them by tanks and aircraft.. Bashar Assad is a dictator.
The question as posed gives no specifics on the country in question. As a result. It is impossible to give any decent answer. Every country responds to its citizens differently. Some are very motivated to satisfy the plebiscite's demands, some are very motivated to crush all dissent, and others are entirely indifferent.
Usually by trying to forcibly suppress any signs of opposition.
Rulers should show how good they are to there people because the people get there character from there rulers, and maybe the people might do some bad to them if the rulers don't treat then very good.
The rulers of libya are picked by the nominations from the people.
People living under the Pharaohs basically had no rights as we know them. The rulers were absolute rulers.
The term "react" is odd. Most of the rulers in Libya are representative of their regions and are doing what they can to advance their regional interests (often over the national interest). However, as Libya is in the middle of a second civil war, many of the leaders are unable to exert influence in the physical areas of the country where they need to.
they were called absolute rulers because people believe that they have absolute powers granted by god so the people need to follow the rulers. The rulers also have divine-rights and they were responsible to no one but god.
I think rulers would benefit from it if they claimed that they were chosen by gods to be the rulers because then the people would be more respectful and treat the rulers with utmost loyalty. More power because people din't want the gods fury.
yes he does