There are many ways that claims are investigated and most times an acurate accessment of liablity can be reached. Damage location, statements,etc. If you are insured turn in the claim if you havent' and the adjuster will fully investigate, when it is a ''draw''' and both claim opposite versions the insured is given the benefit of the doubt.
In most states fault is determined by the police officer responding to the scene of an accident. Depending on the state a missing sign at an intersection may be considered a 4-way stop. Instances like these may require the expertise of a lawyer and possible accident reconstruction. Witnesses also weigh heavily in helping to determine fault.
You need two witnesses to sign the marriage license.
No, not legal.
The motorist is clearly at fault; automobiles must ALWAYS yield to pedestrians, in any case. The previous response assumed you were on foot. I'll assume were in a vehicle. When you looked both ways, you should have estimated the speed of any approaching vehicle and remained at the stop sign until there was an opening large enough to cross safely. It's going to be a lot harder for you to prove he was speeding than it will be for him to prove you did not yield right of way at a stop sign.
The accident was the fault of the man who ran the stop sign.
You need two witnesses to sign the marriage license.
This kind of fault is called a normal fault and is usually a sign of crustal extension.
Well, unless you have an excuse YOUR at fault. it would be your fault because you are supose to do a total check arouond your vehicle before you get in
The person who ran the stop sign is at fault
The car who hit you is at fault , however if you did not have your brakes applied , and if having them applied would have prevented you from hitting the car ahead of you , you would be partly to blame for hitting the car ahead of you. That issue depends on the speed that the other car hit you and the distance you were from the car ahead of you
2nd November
An attorney most likely.