Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.
A rumor is a false statement that has been passed around and a fact is something that is true. For example, if a girl is passing secrets around then that is considered a rumor. A fact is something that you found from a reliable source such as the Internet, books, or the encyclopedia.
extende source is required to get nearly parallel rays of light
Thinking about how the source material applies to your question
The terminology E.M.F is the voltage output of a power source e.g a transformer bank, generator. As relates to potential difference it's a linear electrical field strenght between 2 points. E.g the charged plates of a capacitor.
Yes it is. There are many millions of tons of coal unmined.
No. Blogs contain opinions and ranting. They are unreliable.
When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable, it should be considered unreliable or questionable. It is important to verify information from credible sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.
No. Wind farms are very unreliable as a constant source of energy. They are also expensive to build and maintain.
Information that you can trust would be termed reliable. If you aren't sure of the source, or the source is someone that you don't trust, then the information would be unreliable, and you wouldn't count on it in an important situation. If the information is reliable, then you might trust it without doing your own research.
Ideal sources are ones that would be the first choice if one could choose a source. A practical source is one that is readily available and reliable.
No, it is a very unreliable and inefficient energy source.
They are unreliable.
Reliable is an adjective, and source is a noun.
no difference between emiter follower and source follower
Reliable Source Music was created in 1997.
its a source
Maybe none.