Although we are not talking about a perfect determination, meaning that other factors in this relationship (the so called intermediate factors) have to be controlled in an ideal model the relationship is as follows:
The original status (the status of witch you start as a result of being born in your family - differences being obvious in this mater if you compare the chances of someone who starts out from a south African family or someone who starts from a north American family) regulates, or influences the type of education you get, which on the other hand regulates or influences the resulted social status.
By the way most social theorist agree that the structure of stratification is according to the concept of class (higher, middle, and lower) these being the categories of stratification as well.
I am going to exemplify this.
Lets say that I am the son of an Bank Manager, I will have the chance, because my dad has the money, he will afford to send me lets say to Harvard, where I will get a degree witch in the other hand is highly valued on the job market and will lend me a good paying job with a good social status.
On the other hand if my dad is an unemployed.... I will have to do with community college, or I will have to start working after high school whitout a degree, no degree no good job, no good job no high salary nor good social status.
This is the main idea, but of course maters are not as simple as they seem, if anybody wants to read more about this subject I recommend an article written by prof. dr. Traian Rotariu a professor of sociology who is interested in the mater of social mobility called The Role of School in Social Mobility.
Education influences social stratification by improving the income for some. Those that are educated have a higher potential income. This increases the gap between high and low income earners.
indeed it is. i is from da west end, and i love da edyoocashon.
The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification
social stratification is the ranking of social groups
approaches in the study of social stratification?
social stratification is dividing people by class.
For centuries, sociologists have analyzed social stratification, its root causes, and its effects on society. Theorists Karl Marx and Max Weber disagreed about the nature of class, in particular. Other sociologists applied traditional frameworks to stratification.
The effect of social stratification in education is seen in various ways. This will be able to include a number of cultures together so as to form the basis of the syllabus in the education.
The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification
social stratification is the ranking of social groups
The key determinants of social stratification are economic, social and political policies.
approaches in the study of social stratification?
social stratification is dividing people by class.
For centuries, sociologists have analyzed social stratification, its root causes, and its effects on society. Theorists Karl Marx and Max Weber disagreed about the nature of class, in particular. Other sociologists applied traditional frameworks to stratification.
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
There are some characteristics of social stratification: 1) social (unbiological) - distribution goods in society is based on norms or generally recognized rules; 2) traditionality - social inequality different group of people is saved during all history of human civilization. The common types of social stratification are : economical (the level of wealth and income); political (access to political power); educational (education level); and occupational prestige.
I believe that the social conflict approach best explains the social stratification.
The lower classes have the least to gain from social stratification.
n