Kant is against slavery because it is against the fundamental idea of freedom. Freedom is the ability to set and pursue your own purposes as long as they do not interfere with anybody else. As a slave you cannot set your own purposes, someone is doing it for you. In addition in order to consent to slavery you would have to be a free human being so there is a contradiction there. On the other hand if you are treated as an object you cannot be commanded because objects cannot be commanded. In addition Kant agrees that excercising control over your own body is fundamental and slavery is somebody interfering with this principal. In addition parents cannot sell their children into slavery because children never consented to being born to their parents, children cannot consent until their adults anyways and parents do not own their children.
Slavery was morally wrong and they wanted to end it
I think that slaves mostly did the work,yes they did break tools but this is not how they resisted slavery:)
Yes
Immanuel Kant was the paradigmatic philosopher of the European Enlightenment.
it wanted to keep slavery from spreading into the western territories
He was anti-slavery
the were pro slavery
He writted his book "Slavery in the United States" (1836) to express his view.
anti- slavery view.
he liked having slavery
Most Northern states outlawed slavery
In what way was Abraham Lincoln's view of slavery different from that of Stephen Douglas
it was bad
how did washington view on slavery evolved over time
any individual who is conscious of a life that can go better or worse
Slavery was morally wrong and they wanted to end it
Krishan Kant has written: 'Selected speeches of Krishan Kant'