0
I don't think that this question should ever be answered in great detail, since so crazy person out there is probably going to then blast this world to smithereens. I'm sure the amount of nuclear bombs could be calculated, but then, who on earth would want to know that? We'll all be dead and that is that. Thankyou.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are some bad thing about nuclear bombs?
Nuclear bombs are so powerful, and release so much radioactive fallout, that any large-scale use of nuclear bombs would kill everbody and make the world uninhabitable.
What would a 90 Gigaton nuclear bomb be like?
A gigaton is 1000 megatons so it would be destroy an an area the size of Louisiana. But of course there is no such thing as a gigaton for bombs. IN FACT, there are already 1+ gigaton nuclear weapons. A 1 GT bomb would destroy an area the size of Texas, just with the expansive wave. A 90 GT bomb could change the planet trajectory.
Would one nuclear bomb destroy a city like New York?
Yes, a fusion bomb (hydrogen bomb) would destroy New York City.
How big of an area would a nuclear bomb destroy?
depends on yield an height/depth of burst.
Which countries have nuclear bombs now and do nuclear reactions bring about global warming?
A sufficiently large nuclear war would not cause global warming. Instead it would cause a Nuclear Winter: massive global cooling due to enormous amounts of soot in the atmosphere. This would probably result in an ice age.
How many nuclear bombs would it take to destroy sydney?
One
Does the Great Wall have an inside?
of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH
How many bombs would it take to destroy humanity?
Surprisingly few ! The 'super powers' have enough nuclear weapons between them - to destroy humanity many times over !
What are some bad thing about nuclear bombs?
Nuclear bombs are so powerful, and release so much radioactive fallout, that any large-scale use of nuclear bombs would kill everbody and make the world uninhabitable.
How many nuclear missiles would it take to wipe out UK?
It is difficult to answer how many nuclear bombs it would take to destroy England due to the fact that there are a variety of different nukes. It would most likely take around a couple of dozen.
Are atomic bombs different from nuclear bombs?
Both basically are the same, they can be fission or fusion bombs like Uranium,Plutonium and Hydrogen bombs. A general description would be that atomic bombs are fission bombs. Nuclear bombs are fusion bombs. Fusion bombs are more powerful weight for weight
Why woundn't anyone drop the atomic bomb to end life on earth?
Your question assumes someone would not blow up the world with atomic bombs. That is a fallacy. There are a few humans in this world who would be insane enough to issue enough nuclear bombs in order to destroy the world. They would not be considered "sane rational people" by the rest of the world. Humanity wants to preserve itself. Therefore people are not inclined to "blow up the world". If a poll was taken around the world you would probably learn that people do not want to end the world via nuclear elimination. They want to live and enjoy peace around the world. That is why people would NOT blow up the world with atomic weapons.
What would be the reaction if 2 neutron bombs and 2 nuclear bombs exploded in the same place?
'BOOM'
What would a 90 Gigaton nuclear bomb be like?
A gigaton is 1000 megatons so it would be destroy an an area the size of Louisiana. But of course there is no such thing as a gigaton for bombs. IN FACT, there are already 1+ gigaton nuclear weapons. A 1 GT bomb would destroy an area the size of Texas, just with the expansive wave. A 90 GT bomb could change the planet trajectory.
Why are there no nuclear bombs in Halo 2?
Bombs in Halo 2Because then if it did, then it would destroy most of the maps, if your on them, and modders would have a great advantage and if an atomic bomb in Halo happened to be set off, the players, including yourself, would either be laggy or have blue screen or something (don't question the massive power of bungie)..........also.....halo (the rings) are sort of like atomic bombs. (but stronger.) Edit: blockadeThere are Shiva nuclear warheads which are similar and are used by the UNSC to take care of Covenant fleet and suchAlso earth is the only human planet left so the UNSC wouldn't use a nuclear bomb because that would completely destroy the area and that area would be completely useless to humans as well
If many nuclear bombs were used would the atmosphere detonate?
No, this is not a possibility.
Why is nuclear bombing a good thing?
Nuclear bombing isn't a good thing, but arguably, nuclear bombs are. Confused? Listen: Many nuclear weapons, as most will know, are powerful enough to destroy the planet many times over. But if they didn't exist, World War 3 may have begun, becasue everyone was so terrified of using them--they just didn't. They cannot go off accidentally, as they need to be attached to war-heads, so that fear is useless. Basically, if they didn't exist, World War 3 may have happened: but it would have been with guns and planes and smaller bombs etc.
