answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Thermopylae was a minor sideshow - the Persians rolled on and captured Athens. The invasion was decided at Salamis, Plataea and Mycale.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How might the Persian Wars have ended differently if the Spartans had not held out at Thermopylae?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How might the Persian Wars have ended of the Spartans had not slowed the Persians at Thermopylae?

Thermopylae was a very minor event in the 50-year Persian Wars. It failed to have any influence on the wars, and only later became symbolic of courage.


How might the Persian Wars have ended if the Spartans had not followed the Persian at Thermopylae?

The Spartans did not 'follow' the Persians - they were part of a blocking force which delayed the Persian army for three days, and had no effect on the following two-year campaign which defeated the Persians at the battles of Salamis, Plataia and Mycale.


How do you think the Persians would have ended if the Spartans had not slowed the Persians at Thermopylae?

The purpose of the Thermopylae delay was to provoke a sea battle in the nearby strait of Artemesion, in the hope of destroying the Persian fleet. The Persian fleet won, and the Greeks had to withdraw to try again at Salamis, which they did win. The Thermopylae delay had no effect on the outcome of the war.


What is the importance of Persian Wars and Thermopylae?

The Persian war ended Persian expansion to the west. Thermopylae was a minor tactical delaying action which failed.


What wars were the Spartans involved in?

The Spartans were involved in the Persian Wars, particularly the battle of Thermopylae (where 300 Spartans famously held off the Persians), the Peloponnesian War (against the Athenians), and other minor skirmishes with neighboring city states, which usually ended with the Spartans conquering the other city state.


How might the Persia wars have ended if the Spartans had not slowed the Persians at Thermopylae?

The slowing of the Persian advance at Thermopylae by a force from Greek cities, including Sparta, was to force a sea battle ,but the Greek lost at sea, and the delaying force at Thermopylae was withdrawn. The Greeks won their sea battle at Salamis later on, so Thermopylae had no effect on the outcome of the war. It did, however, become a symbol of staunch resistance.


How might Persia Wars have ended if the Spartans had not slowed the Persians at Thermopylae?

Holding the pass at Thermopylae was used to force a naval battle. The Greeks lost the naval battle, so it was to no avail or effect.


How might the Persian war have ended if Spartans had not slowed the Persian at Thermopylae?

The defence at Thermopylae was to force a naval engagement in the nearby strait of Artemesion, wih the object of destroying the Persian fleet threat to the Greek cities. The Persian fleet won the three day naval battle and the Greek fleet withdrew to try again at Salamis. The blocking force led by Sparta at Thermopylae withdrew as it had no further purpose. THe Spartan and Thespian contingents selflessly continued to hold the pass to allow the other 5,000 contingents to escape. They were slaughtered. This engagement had no effect on the outcome of the war other than as a symbol of resistance.


How might the Persian war have ended if the Spartans had not slowed the Persian at Thermopylae?

The defence at Thermopylae was to force a naval engagement in the nearby strait of Artemesion, wih the object of destroying the Persian fleet threat to the Greek cities. The Persian fleet won the three day naval battle and the Greek fleet withdrew to try again at Salamis. The blocking force led by Sparta at Thermopylae withdrew as it had no further purpose. THe Spartan and Thespian contingents selflessly continued to hold the pass to allow the other 5,000 contingents to escape. They were slaughtered. This engagement had no effect on the outcome of the war other than as a symbol of resistance.


How might the Persians war have ended if the Spartans had not slowed the Persians at Thermopylae?

The slowing of the Persia advance was to force a sea battle in the nearby strait at Artemesia in an attempt to destroy the Persian fleet. As this sea battle failed, the three day delay at Thermopylae had no overall significance. The invasion was turned back at the subsequent battles of Salamis, Plataia and Mycale.


How might the Persian War have ended if the Spartans had not slowed the Persians at Thermopylae?

The defence at Thermopylae was to force a naval engagement in the nearby strait of Artemesion, wih the object of destroying the Persian fleet threat to the Greek cities. The Persian fleet won the three day naval battle and the Greek fleet withdrew to try again at Salamis. The blocking force led by Sparta at Thermopylae withdrew as it had no further purpose. THe Spartan and Thespian contingents selflessly continued to hold the pass to allow the other 5,000 contingents to escape. They were slaughtered. This engagement had no effect on the outcome of the war other than as a symbol of resistance.


How might the Persian wars have ended if the Spartans had not slowed at Thermopylae?

The Persian Wars would have proceeded the same if the Spartans had not slowed the Persians at Thermopylae. The reason the Spartans wanted to hold up the Persian advance was to force a sea battle in the Artemisium Strait to destroy the Persian navy.The Persians won the sea battle, and it had to be refought later at Salamis. After the failure of the sea battle, the blocking force at Thermopylae was withdrawn. The battle had no effect on the outcome of the invasion.No difference whatsoever, the Persians simply moved on with a three day delay of no effect.