A slightly inaccurate statement by promoters of the European Theater of Operations during WW2. Historians who make such statements are considering WW2 to be the ETO (European Theater of Operations), while calling the PTO (Pacific Theater of Operations) the "Pacific War." A form of prejudice of one theater over another. Another example is the starting date of WW2. The same historians chose September 1939 as the starting date for WW2; because it happened in Europe. The war started in Europe in 1939; as did the Asian War in China in the 1930's. NEITHER war was a GLOBAL WAR until the US entered it on December 7, 1941. More accurately stated; Adolph Hitler served bravely in the (Austrian/Bavarian) German Army as a messenger (earning the Iron Cross) during WW1. He was wounded in action (gassed) and hospitalized. During which time word of the Armistice reached him. Displeased with the Treaty that ended the war, he vowed to "right it" when he had the chance. When France surrendered in WW2, he ordered the French to signed their surrender in the very same train car that the Germans had to sign in in 1918; and to further the insult, Hitler refused to honor the signing with his presence (he didn't show up for it). So...those historians state that WW2 was just an extension of WW1.
Yes in the fact that Germany wanted revenge on the Allies after the first World War or the Great War
eat your poo
ameriacan writer henry david thoreau, what was he supporting?
i have no idea but i want a taco
i do believe that it would be free speech,",civil disobedience
Jules Rimmet, some french geezer. The first world cup trophy was named after him, although Brazil now own that trophy.
The idea of atomic structure of the world was proposed intuitively by Leukippus and Democritus 2 500 years ago.
The supporting points to your arguments are listed as sub-points of each of your three main arguments. Keep in mind it's an outline so don't go into too much detail.
To support an idea
Arguments are composed of premises, which are statements that support a conclusion. The conclusion is the main idea or point that the argument is trying to prove. Arguments are used to persuade others by presenting logical reasons and evidence.
to give the details or arguments that support the main idea
an idea that supports something
supporting idea is where we have to explane about the topic like horses
Minor supporting details help to reinforce and expand upon the main ideas or arguments in a piece of writing. They provide specific examples, evidence, or explanations that add depth and credibility to the overall message. Minor supporting details help make the main points more convincing and compelling to the reader.
develops, supports, or explains the main idea of a paragraph
A main idea is not a supporting detail. Main ideas are the central points of a paragraph or passage, while supporting details provide evidence or examples to back up the main idea.
ameriacan writer henry david thoreau, what was he supporting?
is explaining a main idea a main purpose of supporting details
is explaining a main idea a main purpose of supporting details