Want this question answered?
Darwin's theory was accepted,at first Darwin himself did not publish his findings as he did not feel anybody else would agree with his findings but once he found that a fellow scientist had conducted the same research and was going to publish his findings Darwin then also decided that he would publish his findings also.
This question is incomplete. Which finding, and the understanding of whom?
I would present a summary of the evaluation methodology, key findings, implications, and recommendations in a clear and concise manner. Visual aids such as tables, charts, and graphs can also be used to support the findings. The report should be tailored to the audience to ensure understanding and engagement.
It would have taken scientists longer to discover protons. -- Suppose Rutherford had not seen any alpha particles deflected back from the gold foil. How would this most likely affected scientific understanding of the structure of an atom?
You wouldn't be able too see that well on small objects. The understanding of the affect if light microscopes has not been invented would be more confusing. ?btw i got this for homework too. :/
Its important because other scientist can know what they're working on and if its accurate, or if they can improve their findings.
It would have taken scientists longer to discover protons. A+
It would have taken scientists longer to discover protons. A+
Invalid, if experimental findings can not be replicated then it would mean you are testing something that must have a different way of gathering information.
Those Islands would be the Galapagos Islands.
The information after the word "Findings" would mean the Radiologist's interpretation of the CT scan.
mottled