Pink flowers result as a result of a genetic phenomenon called co-dominance. It means both alleles are able to express themselves at the same time thus generating a new phenotype that is unique and bares partial simlarity to both parent phenotypes. It also proves the color theory, a body of practical guidance to color mixing and the visual impact of specific color combinations. Red + white = Pink, no matter what type of mixing or crossing occurs.
It means that all life on this planet is genetically diverse, and the potential for many variations exists. If a different color flower results, it could be an example of a recessive gene, or possibly a mutation.
It proves that at least one of the pink flowered plant was heterozygous.
Assuming that white is recessive to red in this case, then the off spring would all be red but they would be heterozygous red (Rr).
Incomplete dominance can create offspring that display a trait not identical to either parent but intermediate to the two. One example of incomplete dominance is a red flower and a white flower crossbreed to form a pink flower.
incomplete dominance
The scientific name for the color pink is Dianthus plumarius. It is actually the name of a flower. That's how the color pink was named, after a flower.
Incomplete dominance is a form of intermediate inheritance where one allele for a trait is not dominant over anther allele. Because of this, a combined or "mixed" phenotype results. For example, if a red flower is crossed with a white flower, and the offspring is pink, this is considered incomplete dominance.
When a red flower crosses with a white flower, it can create a pink flower. Why? Because of incomplete dominance. Incomplete dominance is when the heterozygous phenotype(offspring) is a blend of the two homozygous phenotypes(parents).
hybrid
The blending of the phenotype of the parents in the offspring is known as incomplete. colors of flowers can show incomplete dominance if a red flower is crossed with a white flower and their offspring are pink.
If you cross a red flower with a white flower, you will get a pink flower. This is incomplete dominance.
Assuming that white is recessive to red in this case, then the off spring would all be red but they would be heterozygous red (Rr).
A phenotype is the composite of an organism's observable traits. The answer to the question, the cross that will yield four phenotypes in the 1:1:1:1 ratio is fifty.
Q: "What is a hink-pink for a loafing flower?" A: a lazy daisyQ: What is a hink-pink for fake coins?" A: funny moneyQ: "What is a hink-pink for an angry employer?" A: a cross bossQ: "What is a hink-pink for a cat's paw warmer?" A: a kitten mitten
A trait that exhibits incomplete dominance, is one in which the heterozygous offspring will have a phenotype that is a blend between the two parent organisms. An example of this is when a homozygous red sweet pea flower crossed with a homozygous white sweet pea flower, their offspring will be heterozygous and have the pink phenotype, rather than either red or white. So, the homozygous red flower will be red, the homozygous white flower will be white, and the heterozygous flower will be pink. So there are three possible phenotypes in incomplete dominance. There are also no dominant or recessives genotypes.
Let RR = Red and WW = White and RW = PinkRR X WW = RW (all resulting flowers are pink)Punett Square of pink cross pink:RWRRRRWWRWWWAs you can see, 50% are pink, 25% are red, and 25% are white.This is an example of incomplete dominance in flower colour.
The national flower of the Maldives is the pink rose.
Incomplete dominance can create offspring that display a trait not identical to either parent but intermediate to the two. One example of incomplete dominance is a red flower and a white flower crossbreed to form a pink flower.
if you mean in terms of what their offspring will be? then you need to do a monohyrid cross, the gametes being RW and WW sooo x R W W RW WW W RW WW it will be 1:1 ratio of pink to white offspring