You have the right to a fair and speedy trial by a jury of your peers.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed. It does not guarantee a jury of one's peers.
Anyone accused of a crime has a right to a trial by an impartial jury. Impartiality as a principle of the right to trial by jury is served not only by the Sixth Amendment but also by the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Trial before a jury and conducted in the state in which the crime occurred.
I do not think this is the right spelling. It should be ARRAIGNMENT --- that means to call him before the court to answer an accusation. In normal practice, arraignment is a hearing where a person accused of a crime must enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or nolo contendre. If they enter a not guilty plea, the case will then be sent on for trial.
what right prevents a government fro Save m a person in jail without informing him of his crime?
"Section 18(a). That in criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to appear and defend, in person and by counsel; to demand the nature and cause of the accusation; to meet the witnesses against him face to face; to have process to compel the attendance of witnesses in his behalf; and a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county."
Southerners believed article 4 section 2 of the constitution game them the right to retrieve an enslaved person who fled across state lines.
protection against double jeopardy I do not think this is a protection again Double Jeopardy as this is a person not being able to be tried for the same crime twice. It is the right to a fair and just trial. Illegally obtaining evidence can be altered (such as recording devices). Also, illegally obtaining evidence breaches a persons Human Rights set out in the European Convention for Human Rights as it would likely be a breach of their Right to Private Life (Article 8). Generally, evidence that is not obtained properly and fairly is considered inadmissible
No.
it guarantees a person who has been accused of a crime the right to a layer even if he/she cant afford one.
A person accused of a crime did not come from Roman Law of Nations.
One reason why it's important to protect the rights of a person accused of a crime, is because the person might turn out to be innocent. The US Constitution guarantees the right to due process.
The right to have an attorney & be presented with the Crown's case prior to the trial.
Miranda rights
The right to remain silent, which is proved through the US Supreme Court Case Miranda v. Arizona. He has the right to an attorney. He has the right to a jury of his peers.
how did roman law protect the rights of an accused person?
That amendment means that when a person is accused of a crime, the person has a right to a trial that is not delayed too long. The person has a right for the trial to be public and not secret. The person has a right to be judged by people who are fair and have not already made up their minds. The person has a right to know what he's being accused of, and the right to know who is accusing him and who the witnesses are who are against him. The person also has a right to find witnesses in his favor, and the person has the right to get help from a lawyer.
That depends on the law of the country that person is in. In many country's the evidence is weighed by judges only, rather then letting any tom dick and harry make these life changing decisions
Unless they waive the right (by chossing to represent themselves, for example) they are always entitled to a legal representative.
Officers must tell the suspect that they have the right to remain silent and that they do not have to confuse to their crime.