answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, an ex post facto law cannot impose punishment on a person who committed an act before it was illegal. This includes increasing the severity of the punishment from what it was when the crime was committed. Ex post facto applies to criminal law and not civil law as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. Also, some laws, for example the sex offenders registry, are considered a regulatory device for public safety and not a punitive action.

no ex-post facto law after the fact. no ex-post facto law after the fact.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

no

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it true an ex post facto law is a law that makes an act illegal after the act has been committed?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Does an ex post facto law make something illegal after the act has been committed?

yes


What are laws that make an act a crime after the act has been committed?

This is called an ex post facto law. They are constitutionally illegal in the United States. Ex post facto is Latin for from after the action or after the facts.


Ex Post Facto protecs a person from?

Ex Post Facto protects a person from being charged with breaking the law or committing a crime if they committed it before the law went into effect. For example if I committed a crime but at the time it wasn't against the law but they soon passed a law saying that it was illegal they could not come after me for having committed a crime that at that time would not have been a crime.


Congress cannot pass laws that make actions illegal after they have been committed people cannot be punished for things that become illegal after they have done them such laws are called?

In the United States, Congress is forbidden of passing what is known as "Ex Post Facto Laws." The United States Supreme Court uses the case of Calder v. Bull in which they ruled that prohibition applied only to criminal, not civil cases to decide ex post facto challenges.


Congress may not pass what law or laws that make an act a crime after the act has been committed?

Ex post facto :)


Can the police press charges if no illegal acts are being committed but we have received warnings?

If you haven't committed any illegal acts there is nothing to charge you with.


Is Ex Post Facto used in criminal court cases?

"Ex Post Facto relates to a change in the law (or the penalties for violation of a law) after a crime has been committed. In most cases, criminal law does not take into consideration what is basically a retroactive change in the law in effect at the time a crime was committed."


Can federal government officials arrest someone for breaking a law that has been passed three months after the person committed the action of the deemed illegal?

That is known as an Ex post facto law. It is Latin for "after the fact." Article I, sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution prevent states and the national government (congress) from enacting such laws.


What part of the constitution makes socialism illegal?

Its not illegal, there are plenty of things in this country that have been socialism for decades...like public education.


What is an ex post law give an example?

The term is ex post facto- Latin for "after the fact". That would be passing a law that makes something you have already done illegal.Example- you painted your mailbox red last month. Today we pass a law that says if you paint a mailbox red, you will be arrested and fined $25. So we come and arrest you, you red mail box person, you! It was NOT illegal to paint your mailbox red last month, so that law should not have been applied "ex post facto".


List and describe the expost facto law?

An ex post facto law is one that is made retroactive to punish an act that wasn't illegal at the time it was committed. For example, if I didn't wear my seatbelt and wearing one wasn't a law, but it became a law the next day, I couldn't get in trouble for it because the "crime" was committed before it was against the law. Article I of the US Constitution specifically says this cannot be done. Laws that don't involve penalties can reference dates in the past to allow an income tax break or permit eligibility for a program based on past actions (such as fighting in a war). The reason the Constitution prevents Congress (and the states) from writing ex post facto laws is to protect the population and other entities from government abuse.


Why were the people in prisions during the holocaust?

Because they had committed crimes. The laws that they had broken may have been ridiculous, or what we would retrospectivly call illegal, but they would have been the laws of the time.