Of course a hand-written, printed signature is legal. If a person's signature, regardless of form, is the one consistently used to "sign" documents, it is the legal recognition of that person.
In Ireland no!
It is not necessary, in many countries, to have a signature in 'cursive' script. Many alphabets preclude the possibility by the nature of the characters.
A verbal contract can be as equally binding as a written one. It is the intent that is important.
Of course fraudulently adding someone's' name to a contract is illegal.
I have never seen a "printed" signature as a substitute for a written one, but both should be equally legal and effective IF that was the apparent intent of the person who did the signing. The same thing applies to a person who is illiterate and cannot print or write, but who can scribble some kind of mark or symbol. That "mark" is legally effective as his or her "signature" if that's how he or she intended it. The same thing applies for stamped signatures or computer-generated signatures. Intent is what controls, and intent is usually proven by the circumstances and the custom in that industry or the habit of those people involved.
Yes. Without an 'original' signature how would anyone know whether it was sent with, or without, the purported writer's approval or input.
No. There is no legal way you can post-date a specific document. You could submit a statement later indicating that you WOULD have, or MIGHT have, agreed with the document on that date, but you cannot reverse the clock.
If you are referring to depictions of currency printed on the fabric that makes up the item being sold, no, it is not.
"Witnessed by," on an application means that someone has observed you sign the application. Authenticity is verified when that person signs it with his/her signature. This makes it a legal document.
On any legal document, you should sign the same name that is printed below the signature line.
A legal signature must be written by hand, not typed.
Signature stamps are legal when used for payroll. Signature stamps are not legal for documents like life insurance policies. Signature stamps are also not legal for deeds for property or for titles for automobiles and other titled possessions.
Signature stamps are legal when used for payroll. Signature stamps are not legal for documents like life insurance policies. Signature stamps are also not legal for deeds for property or for titles for automobiles and other titled possessions.
did u ever see the heartbeat headphnes her signature is printed. onto them :)
No. Forging a signature is a crime.
yes you can highlight for signature
the security code is on the back where the signature is. Its the last 3 numbers of the printed code above the signature
A signature of terms printed upon paper explaining who,which,where and how long...
Legal...Yes..but acceptable as a complete filing...NO.
I have never seen a "printed" signature as a substitute for a written one, but both should be equally legal and effective IF that was the apparent intent of the person who did the signing. The same thing applies to a person who is illiterate and cannot print or write, but who can scribble some kind of mark or symbol. That "mark" is legally effective as his or her "signature" if that's how he or she intended it. The same thing applies for stamped signatures or computer-generated signatures. Intent is what controls, and intent is usually proven by the circumstances and the custom in that industry or the habit of those people involved.
Of course not. Forgery negates any legal document.