When a minor's name is excluded from the public record, that bars law enforcment and the justice system, etc., from giving the name to the newspaper (or anyone else). It does not legally bar the newspaper from printing the name in the paper if the paper gets the name from other reliable sources. Also, if the case was heard in adult court instead of juvenile court, those proceedings and records are generally open for public inspection. Generally a minor's name cannot be a matter of public record. There are exceptions depending upon state statutes and specific circumstances. The best option would be to speak with the state's department of social services, juvenile authorities or the legal aid society.
It depends on the laws in your jurisdiction. In most cases, if the individual is a minor, their identity is protected. However, if they are charged as an adult, their name may be public record. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional for guidance specific to your situation.
So long as the reports are factual there's no law against it. If the newspaper prints something untrue and scandalous about anyone, minors included, it may be liable for defamation of character, but the publication itself is not illegal. Many papers refrain out of concern for the sensitivities of the young, or to avoid giving child predators information on potential victims.
no they are allowed to use pictures and names agaisnt people incase the police need evidence agaisnt there crime:)
yes, you pervert.
That is not possible, you must be arrested, charged and have a trial before you can be convicted of a crime.
Yes, simply being arrested and/or charged does not make you a criminal UNLESS you are convicted of a crime in court.
No. These are two separate actions. "Charged" is accusation of a crime, such as in a formal arraignment. "Convicted" is found guilty of a crime, by a jury or judge in a court of law or adminstrative proceeding.
Being charged is not the same as being convicted. A person who has been charged might still be found innocent of the crime of which he or she has been charged. However, if you have been charged and also convicted of aggravated assault, that is a serious crime and it would involve jail time.
Being charged with the crime is a formal accusation by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS- In England and Wales) that you have committed a crime. In the USA, the law enforcement or prosecutor charges I am led to believe. Same principle however. *It certainly does not mean you are guilty, and everyone is innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. It then has to go to court for a conviction or acquittal (guilty or not guilty) Thus, a conviction is basically a finding of guilt for the charge by the court (who represent the state and the community at large) that you have committed a crime and are to be punished for such offence, this is sentencing.
Yes, entering a guilty plea is the same as being convicted of the crime that the person was charged with.
In the US, the only time you can say a person is guilty of a crime is after they have been convicted of the crime. Until a person is convicted or admits guilt in a court of law, they are charged with the crime or suspected of the crime.
Convicted would be the word, not charged. In some cases people are arrested for a crime, but may not be convicted of the crime for one reason or another. Depending on judicial proceedings, even if you are not convicted the arrest may still show up on your record for a period of time.
Yes, it is a legitimate and legal question.
Because he has not been charged with, nor convicted of a crime.
Yes, it will show that you were arrested and then charged with the crime. But it will show you were never convicted of it.
You can ALWAYS be charged and convicted of a crime that you just committed. However, it cannot be made a part of the same case you were going to court for.