Thrust with Afterburner-> Jf-17 84.4 Kn | TejasMk-I-> 85 Kn
G-limit -> Jf-17 +8.5 g | Tejas Mk-I +9g to -3.5 g
Dry Thrust -> Jf-17 49.4 Kn | Tejas Mk-I 53.9 Kn
Loaded Weight -> Jf-17 9,100kg | Tejas Mk-I 10,500 kg
Tejas has moderate edge in Physical performance front, the Tejas is a wholly different project as far as technology is concerned. Its airframe, made of advanced carbon fibre composites, is light years ahead of the Jf-17 Thunder's all-metal airframe. The same goes for the Tejas' aerodynamics which, because of the compound delta-wing, extensive wing-body blending, and low wing loading are superior to those of the Thunder, which has a more conventional layout along the lines of the F-16 and a rejected Soviet light fighter design. As far as flight dynamics and control go, the Tejas, with its relaxed static stability and quadruplex, full authority fly-by-wire digital flight control system, is far more advanced than the Thunder, which still features conventional controls (fly-by-wire exists only for pitch control).
Vietnam is so messy and not good. Always trying to steal stuff and getting money please believe me. Vietnam is small not bigger than chinas population. They eat bad things
China's population is approximately 13 times larger than Australia's.
lca is better than jf17 ,its avionics is advanced than jf 17, because pakistan air force officer who is incharge of development of jf 17, said that the leave extra space in the aircraft for future upgradation , they wanted the aircraft as fast as india wants because to replace their ageing mirage,f 7 aircrafts,and also they didnt developed the aircraft only the chinese developed it entirely its design, avionics, engine , lru units ,even its cock pit its funny to see that how pakistan claims that the aircraft was developed by coordination of two countries if pakistan says that the developed this fighter indegeneously with cooperation with china india also claim that we also developed sukhoi 30mki with rus
Good Reason: the cultural revolution, where mao got rid of chinas old confucian past, gave women an equal status in chinese society, opened china to the West and expanded chinas econmy. and because of chinas expanding econmy, chinas econmy grew at an annual rate of 11%-15% per year. bad reason: mao had a plan called the great leap forward, which he thought would help china, but it ended up killing 40 million chinese people due to famine. (more than Stalin and Hitler Combined)
Thrust with Afterburner Jf-17 84.4 Kn | Tejas Mk-I 85 KnG-limit Jf-17 +8.5 g | Tejas Mk-I +9g to -3.5 gDry Thrust Jf-17 49.4 Kn | Tejas Mk-I 53.9 KnLoaded Weight Jf-17 9,100kg | Tejas Mk-I 10,500 kgHardpoints Jf-17 7 | Tejas Mk-I 8Max Weapon loadout Jf-17 3629 kg | Tejas Mk-I 4000 kgTejas has moderate edge in Physical performance front and is a wholly different project as far as technology is concerned. Its airframe, made of advanced carbon fibre composites, is light years ahead of the Jf-17 Thunder's all-metal airframe. The same goes for the Tejas' aerodynamics which, because of the compound delta-wing, extensive wing-body blending, and low wing loading are superior to those of the Thunder, which has a more conventional layout along the lines of the F-16 and a rejected Soviet light fighter design. As far as flight dynamics and control go, the Tejas, with its relaxed static stability and quadruplex, full authority fly-by-wire digital flight control system, is far more advanced than the Thunder, which still features conventional controls (fly-by-wire exists only for pitch control).ANS 2 - Having read all the available specs on both of these aircraft, I would say they are extremely well matched. Both have known and reliable engines, both have a similar weapons load, both use the same 23 mm cannon. The differences will come in the avionics suite and in the ability of the pilots.
Since 1949 China's industrial production has continued to thrive. It is rapidly growing at an average annual rate of more than twelve percent.
You are the worst person ever. You are better than no one. And no one is better than the best. So you must be better than the best. But the best is better than the worst. So it is impossible to tell if you're better than me. No wait. I change my answer to "No, I'm better than you."
he skis better than you
The correct wording is "You are better than I." The way to tell is to finish the sentence - "You are better than I am" is correct, whereas "You are better than me am" would be incorrect.
Life is better than death.Peace is better than war.
No the iPhone is not better than the galaxy ad the galaxy Is not better than the iPhone but the Blackberry is better than both
cashews are better than peanuts. That's better than something