You mean they are paying you while you can't work. Yes that is taxable...just like the income it is replacing would have been.
Evidence that you did not work the day you claim to have been injured, or that you were not injured while at work.
Sometimes. If you were injured while on the clock, but engaged in committing a crime, the employer can deny liability.
Workers compensation is similar to insurance. If someone is injured while on the job the employer has to pay for wages lost while injured as well as medical expenses.
Yes
For example; the employer of an employee who injures someone through a negligent act while in the scope of their employment - that employer is vicariously liable for damages to the injured person.
Your employer is liable for ALL injuries that happen to employees "in the course and scope of employment". "In the course" means during the period you are clocked in and subject to the employer's direction. NOT before or after work or while away from the workplace at lunch. "In the scope" means while performing your assigned duties - not while fighting or stealing or picketing.
Worker's compensation is insurance coverage for employees to compensate them in case they are injured while performing their job. The employer pays a premium that covers medical expenses and lost wages in case their employees are injured. If these benefits are excepted the hurt employee must release the employer of further liability. The insurance company pays the claim and the employee can no longer sue the employer for the injury.
When you are asked, 'Have you been bonded previously', on a job application, the employer is asking whether you have been insured. Being bonded means you were insured so if something is broken, lost, or stolen while you are working, it is covered.
In California if you were actually performing work for your employer at the time you were injured it could be covered. You will need an attorney to litigate it because most carriers will initially deny the claim. It depends on the facts and witnesses.
If an employee is injured while performing work for the employer outside the workplace, then the injury should be reported.
legally no, since no one knows about it. Morally, yes.
Yes you CAN, but if you become more sick or become injured because an employer FORCED you to work while you have been 'signed off', then your employer is liable BIG TIME. If you signed a legal waiver and chose to work while being 'signed off' then the consequences would be your problem.