Generally satellite reception is better than cable even when the two are both sent digitally. A satellite signal transfer is more direct and therefore has less chance of interference. The cable signal travels through many feet of wire and connection points. These provide a greater chance of interference. The only time the opposite is true is during bad weather when the satellite signal can degrade.
There may not be that much of a difference, depending on the TV on which you are viewing the satellite or cable. Based on where you live, reception of either the cable or the satellite might be better, but that's a reception issue, not a picture quality problem.
Cost. Any telecast could be transmitted by cable, but the cost of all those extension cords is prohibitive.
where do cleaner shrimp live
Satellite internet is generally more expensive than either Cable or DSL and is much slower. If you live in an area with good cell reception, a cellular modem might be a better compromise.
It depends on whether a bakery where you live would deliver the cake to the wedding reception. It might be quite difficult to transport the cake yourself.
The planet Earth upon which we live has precisely one natural satellite, which is known as the moon, or Luna, and it has a great many artificial satellites, including the International Space Station, communication satellites, surveillance satellites, global positioning satellites, etc.
Yes of course, I happen to live underground. Cell reception is awful though.
You can telephone people and watch tv
indeed it was
A "live" cable is used to supply a voltage potential to a load.
For cable (which I have) it is channel 7abcThat depends on where you live, have cable or satellite reception. Where I live its channel 7in Ireland (north and south) its on rte1and in the UK its on living (sky)
A few of their award shows and major event can streamed live on their website if you do not have cable.