No. It's just the plural form of a singular noun. If you said 'a group of spectators' the word group would be a collective noun.
The collective noun is an audience of spectators.
The noun 'audience' is a standard collective noun for:audience of listenersaudience of spectators
An assembly of listeners or an assembly of spectators is use of the collective noun, assembly.
The collective noun for listeners is an audience of listeners.
A crowd is the collective noun for people watching a match. You cannot have a collective noun of watching a match because watching is a verb, not a noun.
The collective nouns are:a crowd of spectatorsan audience of spectators.
The collective noun is an audience of spectators.
In the phrase, "a group of spectators", the noun "group" is functioning as a collective noun. The standard collective noun is "an audience of spectators"; however, collective nouns are an informal part of language. Any noun that suits the situation can function as a collective noun.
The noun 'audience' is a standard collective noun for:audience of listenersaudience of spectators
An assembly of listeners or an assembly of spectators is use of the collective noun, assembly.
The collective noun is an audience of spectators.
The collective noun for listeners is an audience of listeners.
There is no specific collective noun for sports, however, any appropriate noun that suits the situation will do. Some examples are a field of sports, an arena of sports, a venue of sports, etc.
No. It's just the plural form of a singular noun. If you said 'a group of spectators' the word group would be a collective noun.
A crowd is the collective noun for people watching a match. You cannot have a collective noun of watching a match because watching is a verb, not a noun.
Collective nouns for people at a football match are a crowd of people, a stadium of people, and sometimes a mob of people. The people playing the match are a teams of players, or teams of footballers.
The standard collective noun is: an audience of listeners