Skeptics tend to believe that true knowledge is an impossible endeavor. The range of skepticism goes from doubt to full blown denying that knowledge exists.
cynicism
Usually one grasps knowledge of the object through perception,inference,comparison and testimony but thus attained knowledge may be true or false hence philosophy verifies the validity of these methods. Just as testing tools in computer science, Logic tests the validity of knowledge inferred.
It has been said that the chief value of philosophy lies in the accumulation of knowledge, and the seeking for more knowledge, education, mental freedom, scientific acknowledgement.....but mostly in the logic behind philosophy. The search to find knowledge, and then the scientific facts (according to the law of order) that prove that the knowledge acquired is true. Philosophy to Russell was questioning what is already there and trying to simplify and reduce; Russell proved this in his own work when it came to the Russell Paradox, and his 'Theory of 'Types', which he refined and modified despite the fact that he came up with them. Striving for perfection, answers, and as much knowledge as a human can possibly come to within their lifetime.
True investigationmiserliness
Philosophy is developed by acquiring and evaluating knowledge. When we see the knowledge we have is flawed need to step back and examine what we believe. Unless we are brain washed, we will constantly audit the values we hold dear in the light of experience and correct information. For many reasons information which is accepted as true today may be proven other wise tomorrow. What is worse is the power of charismatic people to persuade us to accept a philosophy which is based on falsehoods or prejudice. People should seek and relish knowledge but never be afraid to question themselves and others before saying "this I believe.
cynicism
true
Usually one grasps knowledge of the object through perception,inference,comparison and testimony but thus attained knowledge may be true or false hence philosophy verifies the validity of these methods. Just as testing tools in computer science, Logic tests the validity of knowledge inferred.
Fact is something that really exists or has occured. Opinion a belief based on experience and on seeing certain facts but not amounting to sure knowledge.
It has been said that the chief value of philosophy lies in the accumulation of knowledge, and the seeking for more knowledge, education, mental freedom, scientific acknowledgement.....but mostly in the logic behind philosophy. The search to find knowledge, and then the scientific facts (according to the law of order) that prove that the knowledge acquired is true. Philosophy to Russell was questioning what is already there and trying to simplify and reduce; Russell proved this in his own work when it came to the Russell Paradox, and his 'Theory of 'Types', which he refined and modified despite the fact that he came up with them. Striving for perfection, answers, and as much knowledge as a human can possibly come to within their lifetime.
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that focuses on the study of knowledge and how we come to know things. It examines questions related to the nature, scope, and limits of human knowledge, as well as the criteria for evaluating beliefs as justified or true.
Because the foundation of true knowledge is the acceptance of total ignorance.
True Knowledge was created in 2007.
Richard Ithamar Aaron has written: 'Our knowledge of universals' -- subject(s): Universals (Philosophy) 'The true and the valid' -- subject(s): Truth
True investigationmiserliness
1. Human reason is a reliable and trustworthy source or instrument of human knowledge that is true and certain. 2. An infinitely inteligent, good and just God exist.
Philosophy is developed by acquiring and evaluating knowledge. When we see the knowledge we have is flawed need to step back and examine what we believe. Unless we are brain washed, we will constantly audit the values we hold dear in the light of experience and correct information. For many reasons information which is accepted as true today may be proven other wise tomorrow. What is worse is the power of charismatic people to persuade us to accept a philosophy which is based on falsehoods or prejudice. People should seek and relish knowledge but never be afraid to question themselves and others before saying "this I believe.