0
President Hoover said in 1930 you do not believe the power and duty of the general government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering agree or disagree?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
I absolutely agree! I could care less how reviled this former President is, the statement quoted above is absolutely correct. It is not duty of the general government, nor do they possess any power to extend relief for individual suffering. This is not to say that the people are not entitled to petition the courts for any redress of grievances, but universal suffering? The only way to accomplish an extension of relief for certain individual is through tax dollars. Public dollars can not and should not be used as public assistance. That they are today is wrong and abhorrent to the Constitution itself. The public can not just vote themselves "free money" without getting that "free money" from somewhere. To tax one person in order to subsidize another is an abrogation and derogation of the first persons rights. The governments business is not charity it is protection. No one is protected by social welfare, it is quite simply a redistribution of wealth. Even though the rich are rarely in favor it is still legal, I'm pretty sure, to be rich in this country. If someone became rich through ill legal plunder then we do not tax this person more than someone who earned their money legally, we prosecute him and fine him for his plunder, perhaps even incarcerating him for his crime. We should not declare plunder legal so we may plunder the plunderers. This is nothing more than lawlessness and...Oh! Look around, what do you know? Lawlessness abounds!
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When the branches of government disagree does the president have the final say?
No, checks and balances then come into play resolving the problem.
Why so you have three branches of government?
Because if we had one president ruling all we would have a dictatorship. There would be no one that could disagree with the president and the president would be like a king. Kings are bad when you are trying to have a fair government
What are argument that individual states have the right to secede from the Union?
Because of the innate soverignty of states, each one has the right to disagree with the central government and secede if it so votes.
Why might economic advisers to the president disagree about a question of policy?
Economic Advisers to President might disagree about a question of policy because of differing scientific judgments or differences in values
The next president of the Philippines would be a woman president will you agree or disagree?
it depends, as long as the next president will be agood leader
What would you if they say write a litter to the president?
If one were to write a letter to the president, it would be wise to address any issues that are important to that individual. If there was any policy that you disagree with, or any bill you would like to see passed, it would be a good opportunity to address such issues.
What are some advantages when living under a constitutional government?
You have the freedom to vote, protest, and disagree with the government.
Is politics best defined as the art of government agree or disagree?
Can politics really be defined as the art of government
Can the president instantly make decisions to help the Nation even if they disagree with the Constitution?
No
Why do you disagree with the electoral system?
Because the public doesn't actually get to pick the president.
Why does separation of powers delay decision making?
The President and the Congress may disagree.
Is the president really anti-American?
Absolutely not. This is a myth, spread by extreme right-wing Republicans who dislike him or disagree with his policies. Most moderate Republicans understand that even if they disagree with President Obama, that does not mean he is anti-American.
