hy everybody well i would say scope not much at the moment but 5 years down the line we will be the king...trust me....see the course aims at providing management skillls as u gain in ny of the mbas plus give you a detailed understanding of the pharmaceutical market which i think i have lerned....and in aadition it gives a place to demonstrate ur technical knowledge which i suppose u have gained in ur grads....i m an MBA biotech 2 sem stud at amity noida....
iam completed B.tech biotechnology,iam planning MBA in biotechnology is it right option to me? iam not interest on reserch so! or intelectual property rights management, iam eligible for this course, hw much i expectafter completion this course comparngly is it above?. ipr management is it in MBA in biotechnology.
There is no scope of finance
The scope of MBA advertisement in Pakistan is quite broad. There are numerous channels and agencies which are wholly solely doing work for advertisement.
An MBA after a biotechnology degree is the best option. You will need to work hard. If you really are interested in research and working, then go for MSc. Still, an MBA is best. I know many people doing this and I am planning on doing the same when I am done with school. Additional Answer The truth is, it depends somewhat on what you want to do. Your question specifically asks which has more "scope", but still is a complex question to answer. An MBA in Biotechnology is a relatively new type of program that is growing in popularity. In some ways, you could say this program has "more scope" as it focuses not only on the science but also on the business side of things. The problem in many of these programs is that much of the science is taught from the theory point of view and not really from a practical sense. As such, people graduating with a MBA in Biotechnology are not necessarily qualified to work as researchers. An MSc in Biotechnology will give you more hands on experience but teaches you little of the business world. You will likely have a much broader biotechnology background when you graduate but, you will mostly be qualified only to do further research (either as a technician or to go on to a PhD). Neither of these is a bad option. It really depends more on what you want to do. With an MBA in Biotechnology you are more likely looking at a job in Administration, Management, Marketing, or Sales. One word of caution, many biotech companies still prefer to hire people with PhDs for many of the upper level management positions, with the exception of some key very top positions (CEO, CFO). Of course, you are going to have to work your way up no matter what you do. With a MSc you are more likely to head into a position as a Technician, Scientific Associate, or to continue on in graduate studies to get your PhD. MSc's often find themselves in a good position to take on a teaching position either at the high school or trade school level as well. One other option of course is to do the MSc and then a separate MBA. This is the broadest scope of all and, far and away in my opinion, the most marketable (I did not do this).
Both fields have immense scope, rest depends on your interest.
MBA broadens the scope of business technicalities of students. It increases the analytical and conceptual business thinking of the students,
Marketing and hrm
To the best of my knowledge, there is no formal combined degree program with both veterinary medicine and an MBA. However, there is a great need in veterinary medicine for trained veterinary businessmen, and some veterinarians do return to school and complete an MBA program to help them understand and run the business of the veterinary clinic.
The MBA a degree that demonstrates the person has a higher knowledge of business principles and concepts. Getting into a MBA program requires a high GPA and high scores on the GMAT.
you love me barbie saloon
Yes, There is a scope for BSc students those who are strong in chemistry.Many of Co. standing to lift you esspecialy PHARMA feild.
An MBA is a master's degree of business administration. It has no paper, and very little real, relation to the field of biochemistry.