There is no reason GMO food should not be labeled from the standpoint of he consumer. From the standpoint of the producers of GMO crops and foods, labeling GMO foods could result in consumers choosing not to buy those foods.
yes because you should know that
Some believe it should be labeled and others believe labeling of GMO foods is unnecessary. A large percentage of consumers want GMO foods to be labeled, but the government, corporations, food companies, etc. oppose labeling.
Though not stated by the FCC or USDA, the labeling of non-GMO products will eventually become outlawed. Similar to that of the use of chemical sweeteners(Aspartame, saccharine, sucralose).
In the United States GMO foods are not labeled, so there are no requirements.
Yes. Yes they should.
No, 'government contract' doesn't require to be capitalized.
As with most products, grape products require kosher certification. If they do not have proper certification, they should not be considered Kosher.
Should companies or government organizations be required to purge your personal information if you request so?
yes
YES Government should be involved in enforcing ethical practices in private companies because even in private companies, scientific advancement should not be placed above ethical codes that would be inhumane
yes they should
You require a specific land grant issued by the government of Mexico. There should be no problem, as most mining operations in Mexico are carried by Canadian, English as well as some American companies.
Because it cause death.
Yes, because if the company is failing, there will be lots of people who don't have any work. Government should aid the failing companies. If government don't aid the failing companies, there will be lots of unemployment and also not just that but, there will be lesser purchasing power which is bad for the country. Because Government get income usually form taxes.
NO because it could be dangerous and then that animal could die
Yes. Yes they should.