Should public examination in Malaysia be abolished by assignments and courseworks?
No public examination in Malaysia should not be abolished by assignments and coursework's, taking the public examination gives a wide range of questions.
1 person found this useful
Answer . NO, I would not have many of the friends that I have today if it were not for my college years and the fraternity that I joined. you just have to be a member to really understand.
There are two ways of looking at this question. Points in favour of abolishing them:- ï¿½ *The approach of present examination systems means the beginning of fear, tension, anxiety and stress in the minds of the students under which if a student doesn't performs according to his/her parents… expectations may lead to students even taking the extreme step of ending their life by doing suicide. ï¿½ *Some people also think that exams are not a reliable test of gauging the ability of the students as luck plays a major role. ï¿½ *Present examination system encourage cramming, unnecessary expenditure on help-books and also encourage private tuition which has resulted in mushrooming of a large number of tuition shops in every city and even small towns by inexperienced persons. ï¿½ *The present examination system doesn't specify the exact criteria for how the marks are given to students. (No one can deny that external factors can sometimes influence the distribution of marks-- like whether the teacher was in an angry mood over something in his/her personal life, or whether the teacher was upset with the class and giving a test to punish them. ï¿½ *The pressure of performing well is so much that if the student has not studied up to the required standards, he/she even sometimes uses unfair means in the examination hall to copy from a near sitting intelligent student and get good marks. Others have also said: School examinations should be abolished because: . It is impossible to test every aspect of a subject within the short exam time, if a student is lucky and what he studied for is tested, he will score higher. . they don't properly assess people's grasp of the subject. You can get higher/lower marks than you deserve. . It is impossible to set the questions at the same difficulty every year, if it is easier, he will score higher. . It is possible to study the tested subjects for the exam then forget everything and yet score high marks. . Some cheaters go undetected and score high marks. . Huge (unnecessary) emotional burden, provides stress etc. Better alternatives include: . put more emphasis on research work . Less stress . Instead of cramming info into students' heads, encourage self-learning + make students better at research skills, these abilities are useful forever and best learnt when young. But those in favour of school examinations say they serve a useful purpose. Thus, they should not be abolished because: . Exams make people better at the subject . content tested in exams are random, so people study everything . since it affects grades, people study harder . there is competition, people study harder . They help the teacher to know what material the students have not mastered and need to study further . They give people important practice in dealing with stress, which can help later on with life's challenges. . The examination system has its own benefits. It's like a self-test to see where we are and how good we fare in something that we do. The purpose of exam has always been a test to let us, human beings, to know our limits and our standards. . Frankly speaking, who can put his/her hand on their heart and say that they would have learned the lessons regarding different subjects themselves if the present examination system were not there and didn't made the students to learn and understand the topics dealing with different subjects to perform at the end of the year. The ANSWER would be No, They wouldn't have. (MORE)
I think it depends upon the objectives of the fraternities. Somefraternities were made to establish hate among others but some weremade to spread love. One thing that must be removed here is thehazing. I do believe that fraternities must be removed if and onlyif they didn't follow the constitution..… (MORE)
good evening sir,. my name is sree, iam studied first year b.com in sree sai padmavathi degree in tirupati. I request sir, please first year degree examination date of timetable. yoursfaithfully,. d.sree.
Unfortunately slavery was a profitable resource for ensuring the wealth of Europe at the labor of Africans It was first thought that the European could use convicts (white) and other dissidents of Europe, however, as devious as it was, it was more profitable to enslave Africans by the thousands and …not pay them a cent for their contribution. They had to release the convicts, which meant their profit margin was cease, so with profits soring via slave labor, the European which began this unfortunate case would never find or discuss a reason to abolish slavery! . Slavery was used throughout history as a profitable resource by both blacks and whites, saying "evil whites" are solely responsible for slavery is idiotic considering Africans sold their own tribe members to slavery as well as used slavery in the past (Egyptian civilizations). Additionally Slavery remains unabolished in several African countries where lighter skinned blacks enslave darker ones. (MORE)
they help in learning of the student and improve their learning skills. exams facilitate and motivate students to learn in a healthy environment .
Yes, the death penalty should be abolished. It is not a deterrentof capitol offenses. There is too great of a risk that an innocentperson will be murdered.
It's your own opinion but I don't see anything wrong with a little public humiliation if you deserve it.
The Electoral College was established in the beginning of the United States' days, when information didn't travel quickly throughout the states and some people were uneducated about presidential candidates. The Electoral College should be abolished because now we have cell phones, television, and in…formation can be attained with a click of a button, whether you're educated or not. (MORE)
there is always a chance the person is innocent and you cannot un-execute them, also one could argue that while a person is still alive they have a chance to change. P.S. this is not a balanced arguement or my opinion i'm just giving the points he/she asked for.
I think yes, It should because people should get a second chance and even though the did somthing to earn it, they might change! Helping Ideas: . Every time someone is put to death penalty, Aloved one screams . Every time someone is put to death penalty, the person who made them get it, g…ets a HUGE sin . Its just flat out wrong... (MORE)
This would be impossible as the basic physics of the designs of fission bombs is well documented in the open literature. Any competent physics grad student could design a medium yield fission bomb that could be expected to work reliably without a test. Countries that want them only need about 4 ye…ars to construct the infrastructure to make the fissile materials to build them. (MORE)
Im running for president in 2028 and Im abolishing the death penalty in the US once and for all becasue I belive that life without parrole is the biggest punishment the criminal will reseve for there crimes. Im a decract, I oppose forgin wars like Iraq, Oppose tax cuts for rich, Support manitory hea…lth care for old.. Vote for A. Jackson on November 7th 2028 (MORE)
Malaysia Day is different from National day/Independence day(31 August 1957).. Malaysia Day (16 September 1963) is the formation of Penisular Malaysia(before was name Malaya) and Sabah with Sarawak. Malaysia Day is usually just an acknowledgement of the day not a public holiday.. The reason Sabah …and Sarawak makes 16 September a holiday because on the same day, it's the Head of State (both Sabah & Sarawak) official Birthday.. However, there was a call and occasionally debate on establishing the Malaysia Day as a nationwide celebrated holiday. The topic is fairly political and open for discussion, especially after the 2008 March 8th General Election. (MORE)
The oral exam of a person on oath in open court is the definitionof a public examination. It is set by a central examining board.
It depends on your point of view, if you think the government isdoing everything wrong, then you would think that, but if you thinkthat the government is doing a good job, you would disagree.
People have been debating this for a hundred years or more. It is a matter of personal perspective.
I don't think so. I would be in favor of changes to the law, but Ithink that the reason it is there is that you often have one spousethat supports the other through school, raising children, etc, andgives up education and training for that commitment, and then thepartner that benefited from that com…mitment and now has so muchthat the other partner worked for and sacrificed for, and wants toleave that commitment all to the other partner. And you can't givethose years back, or expect a single parent to raise and paychildcare for children after having already given up a chance at abetter education, which can't be changed now, because of the burdenof raising the children. There need to be changes made that make it fairer, perhaps, andless likely that someone will just use it as an opportunity tofreeload or whatever. Obviously some people take advantage of this,on both sides... but I don't think eliminating it completely isgoing to help everyone. It will only help one side. (MORE)
You may be assigned a Public Defender in California at different times. If you are being questioned by police, you can request an attorney at that time even if you have not been charged. At your first court appearance - called an arraignment - you will be assigned a Public Defender if you don't alre…ady have one and can't afford to hire a lawyer. But you can also contact the Public Defender's Office before your arraignment. Bear in mind that the first Public Defender you speak with may not represent you at all phases of your case. The Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office has a great description of its procedures in the first related link below, but the procedure may be different in different counties. Use the second related link to find Public Defender offices in any county, with links to their websites. (MORE)
More disipline can lead to more aggresive children and in the end,they can also be as agressive as their parents did.
Every one has to pass through the ordeal of examinations and only those succeed in life who are ready to face all sorts of tests in their lives. Thus exams cannot be abolished.
it should be abolished because if they carry on it could really damage kids legs,arms and bums
It should be abolished because it make kids feel bad aout them self that they can't do good in math writing reading that mess . The function of Report Cards has nothing to do with emotional support - indeed, I would argue that the above answer is seriously flawed. Schooling is fundamentally abo…ut a single over-arching goal: producing a person well-adapted to survive and function well in society. To this end, the major thrust of schooling is to impart knowledge to the student, to enable them both to understand their society, and to be able to make "good" rational choices in their lives. That is, to know enough facts to understand things, and to have enough analytical skills to determine answers from a given set of facts. Report Cards are a method of informing people (both the student and the parent) as to how well the student is progressing on both of those immediate goals. Without reasonably frequent updates as to how a student is progressing, how is that student (or teacher, or parent) able to make any assessment of accomplishment? In other words, people need feedback as to how well they are progressing towards a goal, to enable that person to make any necessary adjustments which would enable them to reach their goal (or, reach it faster)? The method(s) used to determine how students are doing is of course highly debatable, and of course the optimal frequency of doing summary reports (which is what a Report Card is) can vary, but there must be some very concrete method of judging progress and giving feedback. Frequent parent/student meetings with teachers is also great, but some metric must be provided to understand where progress is lacking, improving, or exceeding expectations. Report Cards are an excellent place to summaries these metrics. (MORE)
I'm not completely sure but i'd imagine they would want a stratified sample based on the size of the school. They are chosen at random.
To make any change to the Office of the Queen, or the Office of the Governor General, or the Offices of the Lieutenant Governors, would need the agreement of the Senate* and the House of Commons for a constitutional amendment. The amendment would also need to be supported by resolutions passed by al…l ten of the provincial legislatures. (*Should the House of Commons and the ten provinces agree on an amendment, the Senate has only a 180-day suspensive veto to block such a change.) There are many arguments for Canada staying a constitutional monarchy . The low costs of the constitutional monarchy are one positive aspect of such a system; Canada does not pay the day-to-day costs of Her Majesty the Queen of Canada. Rather, Canada pays the modest costs of the Governor General, and the Lieutenant Governors; and were the Crown to be changed or removed, the functions of these viceroys and vicereigns would need to be performed by some other head of State. The development of such a role, and the cost of the changes of such a system would most probably exceed the costs of the current constitutional monarchy. Also, the embedded nature of the constitutional monarchy makes the Crown very fundamental to most aspects of Canadian government. The Queen is the core of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government for Canadians; the system would need to be entirely reworked ("back to the drawing board", so to speak) to accomodate the removal of the Crown as a Canadian institution. (MORE)
Yes, absolutely. You want to give a full and complete picture of yourself. You also want to show that your not a stagnant personality, but one who continues to learn and grow, which can be of benefit to an employer.
School examinations should be abolished because: . they don't properly assess people's grasp of the subject. You can get higher/lower marks than you deserve. . It is impossible to test every aspect of a subject within the short exam time, if a student is lucky and what he studied for is tested,… he will score higher. . It is impossible to set the questions at the same difficulty every year, if it is easier, he will score higher. . It is possible to study the tested subjects for the exam then forget everything and yet score high marks. . Some cheaters go undetected and score high marks. . Huge (unnecessary) emotional burden, provides stress etc. Better alternatives include: . put more emphasis on research work . Less stress . Instead of cramming info into students' heads, encourage self-learning + make students better at research skills, these abilities are useful forever and best learnt when young. School examinations should not be abolished because: . Exams make people better at the subject . content tested in exams are random, so people study everything . since it affects grades, people study harder . there is competition, people study harder . They cause stress, allowing people to better deal with challenges (an extremely useful ability). (MORE)
Different people have different opinions. I personally think that they should. They focus on looks instead of personality, I mean what if a girl looked beautiful but had a rubbish personality?
we shouldn't abolish the Olympics because people have been working very hard and it won't be fair for the athletes
it has in most contries but there is probably still a few in which it happens. those contries should also stop it however they often need the children to go out to work to have enough money to survive. There are laws about in every region of the world, however, it still happens- ALLOT.
Gibbeting, where executed corpses were displayed publicly in cages was abolished in 1843. Public executions stopped in 1868 and the hanging, beheading and quartering of traitors ended in 1870.
well depends on your point of view. If you work for the government that almost powers most of there jobs along with tax money so yah it all depends
If you are charged with a crime that could result in loss of liberty, you are entitled to a public defender if you can't afford to hire a criminal defense lawyer. You can ask for a Public Defender the first time you appear in court, which is usually at your arraignment (the hearing shortly after you…r arrest, when the court informs you of the charges against you). Details are in the first related source below. I found at the second related source, where you can find more links to information about Minnesota courts and criminal procedure. (MORE)
Test examination is a work given to a scholar in the class for which he is assigned marks, while assignment is a work given to the scholar to do at home and show it on the class specified.
When writing an essay about why exams should not be abolished, itis important to write an introduction paragraph that captures thereader's attention and end with a strong thesis statement. Use thesecond paragraph to briefly state why they should be abolished. Usethe next three paragraphs to explain …your support for your thesisstatement before writing conclusion. (MORE)
i would just try to stick to it -that also happens to me at times :/ try to not get behind with thw work you are doing right now and also, progressionally, try to get caught upwith your work. take a few days and saty up a little to get it done- i find it a lot better to just get a piece of work… done with instead of leaving it for the next day and putting it off. also, if your having a problem not being able to understand something the best thing to do would probably ask a friend that's doing the same thing as you. if you really needed to, you can even ask your teacher for an explanation for something that yu really don't get. -just don't put the work off for too long, or evntually you wont feel like doing it at all (if you might already be here, then i would just start finding some time and get to doing it :P) -that's about all i can think of at the moment... (MORE)
This question will be debated forever. I'm not sure if there is a right or wrong but only individual opinions. My personal opinion is that there are some crimes so horrible and cruel that only the death penalty seems just. I think Ted Bundy deserved death but that is just my opinion. There are mil…lions of people that want to see it abolished and that's right for them. So it all comes down to what is right for you. I try to imagine what I would feel like if someone I loved was murdered, and I think I would feel that the murderer lost the privilege to life. So the bottom line is pick the side that's right for you. (MORE)
no - WikiAnswers is not going to write a speech for you to copy.Cheating is wrong.
i really hate exams but i see no reason for it to be abolished. it's the ONLY way to test if the students really understand the lesson. it's kinda like a big help to us since we're benefiting from it. but, of course, if you're motivationally deficient, then tests don't really matter at all. XD
No, exams sudn't b abolished. If der r no exams most ppl won't study or wud b 2 lazy 2 study and those who wud study won't b able 2 analyise themselves.
Actually, it shouldn't be because when charities need food, canned foods dont get spoiled unless opened. Without canned foods, countries all around the world would be starving.
Whether or not public examinations should be abolished depends onpersonal opinion. Some people do not believe these exams properlyreflect the student's knowledge.
No because if that happens than the teacher will not know if you can do the work alone or not
Exam should not be abolish because alots of studnt spend much money during exam tym,spend time 2 read,ame have h6pe dat exam wil be good
Because they are an indication of how much the of the material being taught, that the pupil has absorbed and been able to recall.
You should not generally abolish grades K to 12 schooling because it will severally limit the education of young people. Even if education is more limited, it will still provide the building block for the future.
Of course not. Projects often constitute an important part of education. Most intelligent and educated people would say they should not be abolished If they are abolished then it would be as well to abolish all other aspects of education. For some at least. Students asking such questions, and… being unable to answer them with a rational argument, either for or against, have missed the entire point of any schooling received. (MORE)
Yes they should. All the IMF and WB do is cause poverty around the world, and ruin countries. A simple solution to world poverty is simple: abolish the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.. William R.. NCFCA debtor peoples:).
There are many public banks in Malaysia for one to chose from. Popular ones include Affin Bank Berhad, Aliance Bank, AmBank Berhad, CIMB Bank Berhad, and Hong Leong Bank Berhad.
because it makes a never ending cycle of abuse and causes people to do bad things