this is a question with several differant answers..... depending on consuption if its going on a consuming structure co-generating or a stand alone generation station. the most cost effective would be a hybrid thermal/photovoltaic the thermal would heat a closed contained liquid and make steam to turn large turbine. $150,000US will get u quite the little generator. $1,000,000US u have a major player my general rule is $15us per sq ft of heating/cooling space. I am presently puting together the single largest solar project of its kind. entire subdivisions of low cost modular homes with the entire roof as the mini-generating station. so if u put up say 400 units. when this hole subdivision comes on line u have a major Generating Station. maitaining a plant with no moving parts to wear-out, well except to send some one to clean the panels off once every 6 months wound not be much up-keep...... the panels have 20 to 25yr warrenties and 30yr life some put up in the late 60's r still generating. JD Polk, founder&ceo
Alternative Resource Electric Corp inc
(solar,wind & tidal-flow generation one platform)
http://reitbubbleproof.blogspot.com/
904.333.9814
888.448.9188
cell 904.525.POLK
Clearly the Sun is a very large source of free energy. The costs lie in the large-scale engineering works required to put this energy into a useful form for people to use and store for heating, power generation etc. Those initial costs tend to be greater than building conventional power stations, but the energy is then free, apart form maintenance costs. You are always talking of tens of millions to build large power or energy plants.
Its a US Military secret but if you keep it secret ill tell you.
Its millions of dollars, approxamately 10000yourmother000000
Yes, wind turbines are very feasible. There are approximately 165,000 wind turbines generating electricity world-wide. The wind industry world-wide is expected to have more generating capacity in 2015 or 2016 than the nuclear industry. Wind turbines last 20-25 years, and while they have high up-front costs they typically pay for themselves in 2-4 years, generating profits for the remainder of the time. As fuel costs are zero and maintenance requirements are lower than for fossil-fuel generating plants, they can be a very profitable investment. Wind energy in the best locations is currently coming in at 5-6 cents US per kilowatt hour. In a December 2011 energy auction in Brazil -- an auction where companies bid to build generating capacity -- wind farms won just under a gigawatt of the 1.2 gigawatts requested, with 39 out of the 42 winning bids. This is particularly relevant as the Brazilian auction was a completely level playing field; wind generation receives no subsidies of any kind in Brazil.
Hydropower, when compared to other sources of alternative energy, holds many advantages. It is one of the most environmentally friendly of all electricity power sources (However, its environmental impact is considered to be more intrusive than benign). They also have the lowest operating cost of any electricity source (recommend go to wvic.com/hydrofacts). Most hydroelectric dams have very long lifetimes and permit electrical generating output to be quickly varied. Nevertheless, as a disadvantage, they require large capital investments and a time scale of years to build.
Electricity
Because the power plant is the source of electricity
because they use the energy to build things
The US DOES use wind energy- but it is not free. Wind generators cost money to build and to maintain. The wind does not always blow, and winds may blow in an area that does not need electricity. there is a cost to moving electricity from one area to another.
It just means generating trust. I.e. trying to build trust, maintain trust in someone etc.
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) was established on May 1, 1969 by the promulgation of the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand Act B.E. 2511 which merged assets and operations of the three previous state enterprises, namely Yanhee Electricity Authority, Lignite Authority and the Northeast Electricity Authority. It presently is the state enterprise under the Ministry of Energy. EGAT presently builds, owns and operates several types and sizes of power plants across the country with a combined installed capacity of 15,035.80 MW, accounting for about 59 percent of the country's 25,646.99 MW generating capacity. EGAT also purchases electric power from private power companies and neighboring countries. Thailand currently relies on natural gas for about two-thirds of its electricity production, with the remainder coming from coal and hydropower. Electricity demand currently exceeds generating capacity, forcing Thailand to import electricity from neighbouring Laos and Malaysia. Plans have recently been announced for nuclear build, but this is at a very early stage, start of build scheduled 2015.
The Tennessee Valley Authority Act created a public corporation that was authorized to build dams and electrical generating-plants.
electricity is build in a company
positive energy!!! static electricity
generating electricity without using fossil fuels or nuclear energy The uses of hydroelectricity are the same as any other form of electricity--your device can't tell the difference between hydroelectricity, coal electricity, natural gas electricity or nuclear electricity.
No. Wind farms are very unreliable as a constant source of energy. They are also expensive to build and maintain.
Because hydroelectric plants are important because they provide a low poultion and cheap energy. The plants are expensive to build.
They build dams in rivers because they can get electricity from the energy of water without pollution and it is safe.
it gives u power.
The Tennessee Valley Authority created this public corporation.